Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (16)
- Selected Works (6)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (6)
- University of Richmond (5)
- Cleveland State University (3)
-
- New York Law School (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- SelectedWorks (3)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- The University of Akron (2)
- University of Maine School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Penn State Law (1)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- University of Denver (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of San Diego (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (16)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (5)
- University of Richmond Law Review (4)
- Catholic University Law Review (3)
- Cleveland State Law Review (3)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- NYLS Law Review (3)
- Oklahoma Law Review (3)
- Akron Law Review (2)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (2)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (2)
- Maine Law Review (2)
- Tonja Jacobi (2)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Geoffrey S. Corn (1)
- John F. Stinneford (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1)
- Kit Kinports (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Lawrence Rosenthal (1)
- Nevada Law Journal (1)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (1)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (1)
- Northwestern University Law Review (1)
- Powell Speeches (1)
- Richard Daniel Klein (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 61 - 79 of 79
Full-Text Articles in Law
Silence Should Be Golden: A Case Against The Use Of A Defendant's Post-Arrest, Pre-Miranda Silence As Evidence Of Guilt, Marty Skrapka
Silence Should Be Golden: A Case Against The Use Of A Defendant's Post-Arrest, Pre-Miranda Silence As Evidence Of Guilt, Marty Skrapka
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rethinking The Involuntary Confession Rule: Toward A Workable Test For Identifying Compelled Self-Incrimination, Mark A. Godsey
Rethinking The Involuntary Confession Rule: Toward A Workable Test For Identifying Compelled Self-Incrimination, Mark A. Godsey
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
For more than a century, the Supreme Court has interpreted the Bill of Rights as prohibiting the police from obtaining involuntary confessions from suspects through the use of coercion. If asked whether this involuntary confession rule is an understandable and workable doctrine, however, a noticeable percentage of judges, prosecutors, police officers, criminal defense attorneys and law professors would answer with an unequivocal no.
Basic questions concerning voluntariness and free will - whether it exists, and if so, when it exists, etc. - have puzzled philosophers for centuries and represent one of history's Gordian knots. Not surprisingly, judges have fared no …
A Jurisprudence Of Doubt: Missouri V. Seibert, United States V. Patane, And The Supreme Court's Continued Confusion About The Constitutional Status Of Miranda, Johnathan L. Rogers
A Jurisprudence Of Doubt: Missouri V. Seibert, United States V. Patane, And The Supreme Court's Continued Confusion About The Constitutional Status Of Miranda, Johnathan L. Rogers
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law, Marla Graff Decker, Stephen R. Mccullough
Criminal Law, Marla Graff Decker, Stephen R. Mccullough
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The New Frontier Of Constitutional Confession Law - The International Arena: Exploring The Admissibility Of Confessions Taken By U.S. Investigators From Non-Americans Abroad, Mark A. Godsey
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
This Article is part two in an ongoing series. Part I, published at 51 DUKE L. J. 1703 (2002), argued that Miranda warnings should not be strictly required when U.S. agents interrogate non-U.S. citizens abroad. This Article picks up where the first left off, and asks the question: "In the absence of Miranda, do any provisions in the Bill of Rights restrict the ability of U.S. agents to obtain confessions from non-Americans abroad?"
The Article begins by examining the back up or default rules to Miranda in the domestic setting. These rules are the "due process involuntary confession rule," which …
Criminal Law And Procedure, Julie E. Mcconnell, Gregory Franklin, Craig Winston Stallard
Criminal Law And Procedure, Julie E. Mcconnell, Gregory Franklin, Craig Winston Stallard
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Miranda's Final Frontier - The International Arena: A Critical Analysis Of U.S. V. Bin Laden, And A Proposal For A New Miranda Exception Abroad, Mark A. Godsey
Miranda's Final Frontier - The International Arena: A Critical Analysis Of U.S. V. Bin Laden, And A Proposal For A New Miranda Exception Abroad, Mark A. Godsey
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
In recent years, the FBI and other federal law agencies have greatly expanded their presence abroad, investigating everything from narcotics trade and internet fraud schemes to terrorism. This trend will undoubtedly continue in the aftermath of September 11th. A constitutional question that will be of increasing importance in this context is whether, or to what extent, U.S. law enforcement officials (hereinafter "FBI") must provide Miranda warnings to non-U.S. citizens interrogated abroad who will later be tried in the United States.
The article first addresses whether future modifications to the Miranda doctrine are permissible after Dickerson. The article concludes that despite …
Thinking The Unthinkable Recasting The Presumption Of Edwards V. Arizona, Eugene L. Shapiro
Thinking The Unthinkable Recasting The Presumption Of Edwards V. Arizona, Eugene L. Shapiro
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
The "Burden" Of Proof In Federal Habeas Litigation, J. Thomas Sullivan
The "Burden" Of Proof In Federal Habeas Litigation, J. Thomas Sullivan
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Calmer Seas: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Law Rulings Of The 1993-94 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Calmer Seas: The Supreme Court's Major Criminal Law Rulings Of The 1993-94 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York's Loyalty To The Spirit Of "Miranda": Simply The Best For Twenty-Five Years, Lorraine J. Adler
New York's Loyalty To The Spirit Of "Miranda": Simply The Best For Twenty-Five Years, Lorraine J. Adler
Vanderbilt Law Review
The landmark Supreme Court decision Miranda v. Arizona, recognized a defendant's right to be informed of the rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause, including the right to counsel. The Miranda Court realized that a suspect may feel compelled to waive his Fifth Amendment privilege while in official detention. The Court held that the police must read the now-familiar warnings to a subject in custodial interrogation before he can waive his rights. Therefore, the Court in Miranda chose to strike the balance between effective law enforcement and protecting a subject's constitutional rights at the point of informing the subject …
When Terry Met Miranda: Two Constitutional Doctrines Collide, Mark A. Godsey
When Terry Met Miranda: Two Constitutional Doctrines Collide, Mark A. Godsey
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure—Miranda Warnings—Waiver Of Right To Counsel At Polygraph Test, Scott J. Lancaster
Criminal Procedure—Miranda Warnings—Waiver Of Right To Counsel At Polygraph Test, Scott J. Lancaster
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Impeaching A Defendant's Testimony By Proof Of Post-Arrest Silence: Doyle V. Ohio, F. Ronald O'Keefe
Impeaching A Defendant's Testimony By Proof Of Post-Arrest Silence: Doyle V. Ohio, F. Ronald O'Keefe
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note will attempt to outline the genesis of the issue of impeachment by post-arrest silence by first discussing the various inquiries into the probative value of silence which had been undertaken by courts on the federal level before Hale (United States v. Hale, 422 U.S. 171 (1975)) . The focus will then shift to the Hale Court's treatment of this issue. The constitutional aspects of the issue will then be discussed, and the pronouncement of the Doyle Court (Doyle v. Ohio, 96 S. Ct. 2240 (1976)) will be analyzed with an emphasis on the continuity between the Hale and …
The Suspect And Society, Lewis F. Powell Jr.