Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (312)
- University of Michigan Law School (221)
- Columbia Law School (177)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (168)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (157)
-
- Cornell University Law School (130)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (126)
- William & Mary Law School (126)
- University of Colorado Law School (118)
- American University Washington College of Law (116)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (92)
- Brooklyn Law School (89)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (69)
- UC Law SF (69)
- Boston University School of Law (62)
- Pace University (61)
- University of Richmond (57)
- Georgetown University Law Center (56)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (56)
- Southern Methodist University (54)
- Duke Law (53)
- University of Missouri School of Law (53)
- University of Miami Law School (52)
- Roger Williams University (50)
- Notre Dame Law School (41)
- Fordham Law School (40)
- New York Law School (39)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (39)
- University of Georgia School of Law (39)
- University of Baltimore Law (37)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal procedure (332)
- Criminal law (270)
- Death penalty (161)
- Criminal justice (153)
- Capital punishment (148)
-
- Criminal Procedure (146)
- Sentencing (143)
- Evidence (142)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (140)
- United States Supreme Court (138)
- Sixth Amendment (126)
- Police (114)
- Criminal Law (111)
- Fourth Amendment (98)
- Prosecutors (93)
- Due process (71)
- Fifth Amendment (70)
- Admissibility (67)
- Constitutional law (65)
- Punishment (64)
- Witnesses (59)
- Plea bargaining (58)
- Testimony (57)
- Juries (56)
- Right to counsel (56)
- Confrontation Clause (54)
- Exclusionary rule (54)
- Constitutional Law (51)
- Crime (51)
- Race (51)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (627)
- Articles (313)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (280)
- All Faculty Scholarship (267)
- Faculty Publications (203)
-
- Publications (135)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (125)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (123)
- Scholarly Articles (102)
- Supreme Court Case Files (86)
- Scholarly Works (85)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (83)
- Journal Articles (79)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (60)
- Law Faculty Publications (60)
- Faculty Works (56)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (56)
- Jesse Carter Opinions (55)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (53)
- Articles & Chapters (35)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (33)
- Book Chapters (33)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (32)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (32)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (26)
- McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles (26)
- Working Paper Series (26)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (25)
- Popular Media (25)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (25)
- File Type
Articles 3541 - 3570 of 3787
Full-Text Articles in Law
Craig V. Boren, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Brewer V. Williams, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Brewer V. Williams, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Santa Fe Industries, Inc. V. Green, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Santa Fe Industries, Inc. V. Green, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Castaneda V. Partida, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Castaneda V. Partida, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
"A Most Deplorable Paradox": Admitting Illegally Obtained Evidence In Georgia--Past, Present, And Future, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
"A Most Deplorable Paradox": Admitting Illegally Obtained Evidence In Georgia--Past, Present, And Future, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
Scholarly Works
This Article explores the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence in Georgia criminal cases prior to 1961 and during the post-Mapp era and endeavors to assess the future admissibility of illegally seized evidence in Georgia under both federal and state law.
Section 12 Of The Canada Evidence Act And The Deliberations Of Simulated Juries, Valerie P. Hans, Anthony N. Doob
Section 12 Of The Canada Evidence Act And The Deliberations Of Simulated Juries, Valerie P. Hans, Anthony N. Doob
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
In the past, there have been three major approaches to the experimental investigation of the jury. First, juror selection research involves the study of the relation between verdicts or leniency toward certain classes of defendants and the characteristics of potential jurors. The second class of research is group study, in which the amount and style of individual participation is observed within the context of simulated jury deliberations (e.g., Strodtbeck, James and Hawkins, 1957). Finally, experimental psychology has made another contribution to the study of the jury; numerous researchers have conducted experimental studies employing legal stimulus materials. Typically, in such a …
The Summary Contempt Power And The Constitution: The View From Without And Within, Robert Allen Sedler
The Summary Contempt Power And The Constitution: The View From Without And Within, Robert Allen Sedler
Law Faculty Research Publications
The "political trials" of the past decade generated a storm of legal controversy over the conduct of the defendants and their attorneys-and of the judges who presided at their trials. For some, the actions and attitudes of both lawyers and defendants courted disrespect for and presaged a breakdown in the law and its processes; for others, however, it was the response of the judges-chiefly, their heavy-handed wielding of the summary contempt power--that presented the real danger. Professor Sedler brings a unique expertise to his discussion of the use-and abuse--of summary contempt. While his approach reflects the concerns of the scholar, …
Evidence: Prior Crimes And Prior Bad Acts Evidence, Paul W. Grimm
Evidence: Prior Crimes And Prior Bad Acts Evidence, Paul W. Grimm
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Equal Protection And Criminal Sentencing: Legal And Policy Considerations, Mark Berger
Equal Protection And Criminal Sentencing: Legal And Policy Considerations, Mark Berger
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
The New Federalism In Criminal Procedure Revisited, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
The New Federalism In Criminal Procedure Revisited, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
Scholarly Works
As a result of the Burger Court's seemingly inexorable relaxation of federal protection for criminal defendants, a number of state courts have continued to expand basic rights on state law grounds, thereby utilizing the adequate state ground doctrine to avoid further review by the Burger Court. Part II of this article will examine the evasion cases decided since March 1975. The prospects for continued evasion will be accessed in Part III.
Reducing Sentencing Disparity: Structured Discretion And The Sentencing Judge, Mark Berger
Reducing Sentencing Disparity: Structured Discretion And The Sentencing Judge, Mark Berger
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Comment On Justification And Excuse, Jerome Hall
Comment On Justification And Excuse, Jerome Hall
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Pro Se Litigation -- Litigating Without Counsel: Faretta Or For Worst, Susan Herman, Ira P. Robbins
Pro Se Litigation -- Litigating Without Counsel: Faretta Or For Worst, Susan Herman, Ira P. Robbins
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Twilight Of Welfare Criminology: A Final Word, Stephen J. Morse
The Twilight Of Welfare Criminology: A Final Word, Stephen J. Morse
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Metaphysics Of Punishment–An Exercise In Futility, William K.S. Wang
The Metaphysics Of Punishment–An Exercise In Futility, William K.S. Wang
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
United States V. Maccollom, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Maccollom, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Mandujano, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Mandujano, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Jurek V. Texas, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Roberts V. Louisiana, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Roberts V. Louisiana, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Proffitt V. Florida, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Proffitt V. Florida, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Stone V. Powell, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Woodson V. North Carolina, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Woodson V. North Carolina, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Gregg V, Georgia, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Tsc Industries Inc. V. Northway, Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Tsc Industries Inc. V. Northway, Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Notice In Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Adrienne Volenik
Notice In Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Adrienne Volenik
Law Faculty Publications
Despite these suggestions, the problem of what constitutes adequate notice continues to plague juvenile courts. Furthermore, by suggesting two criminal and two civil cases as examples, the Court added the issue of whether a civil or a criminal standard for notice should be applied. Courts that have addressed this issue have reached different conclusions.
Parole Revocation And The Right To Counsel, Paul W. Grimm
Parole Revocation And The Right To Counsel, Paul W. Grimm
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Book Review, Peter D. Garlock
Book Review, Peter D. Garlock
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
The author reviews Thorns and Thistles: Juvenile Delinquents in the United States, 1825-1940.
The Street Perspective: A Conversation With The Police, Patrick Baude, James F. Gallagher
The Street Perspective: A Conversation With The Police, Patrick Baude, James F. Gallagher
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
A Reconsideration Of The Fourth Amendment's Doctrine Of Search Incident To Arrest.Pdf, David Aaronson
A Reconsideration Of The Fourth Amendment's Doctrine Of Search Incident To Arrest.Pdf, David Aaronson
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
INTRODUCTION: The doctrine of search incident to arrest provides that, as an incident to every lawful full custody arrest, law enforcement officers have an automatic right to conduct a thorough search of the arrestee and the area within his immediate control.' Although the Supreme Court has stated that the search incident to arrest exception to the fourth amendment's general requirement of a search warrant has been "settled from its first enunciation," the doctrine should be reexamined in terms of constitutional jurisprudence.
More On The New Federalism In Criminal Procedure, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
More On The New Federalism In Criminal Procedure, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
Scholarly Works
The Burger Court has continued to relax federal constitutional restraints on the power of police and prosecutorial officials to detect and convict persons suspected of crime. During the 1973 Term, the fourth amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure appears to have been the principal casualty of the Court's permissive attitude toward the exercise of governmental authority to enforce criminal laws. Although over half a dozen search and seizure cases were decided, in not a single one did the Court find that evidence had been obtained in violation of the fourth amendment. Other decisions narrowly interpreted the …