Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (19)
- University of Missouri School of Law (8)
- Columbia Law School (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (6)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Brooklyn Law School (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- BLR (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- UC Law SF (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (2)
- University of the Pacific (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Law and Procedure (13)
- Criminal law (8)
- Criminal procedure (8)
- Sentencing (7)
- Capital punishment (6)
-
- Crime (6)
- Criminal Law (6)
- Criminal Procedure (6)
- United States Sentencing Commission (6)
- Death penalty (5)
- Police (5)
- Sentencing commission (5)
- United States Supreme Court (5)
- Federal Sentencing Guidelines (4)
- Punishment (4)
- Sentencing guidelines (4)
- Confessions (3)
- Confrontation Clause (3)
- Courts (3)
- Crawford v. Washington (3)
- Evidence (3)
- Federal sentencing (3)
- Federal sentencing guidelines (3)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Self-incrimination (3)
- Sixth Amendment (3)
- Apprendi (2)
- Bail (2)
- Colorado (2)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (19)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (19)
- Faculty Publications (11)
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Working Paper Series (6)
-
- Articles (5)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Publications (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (3)
- Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers (3)
- Scholarly Articles (3)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (2)
- Book Chapters (2)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (2)
- Faculty Works (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- War Crimes Memoranda (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Presentations (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- Senior Thesis Projects, 2003-2006 (1)
Articles 31 - 60 of 114
Full-Text Articles in Law
Summary Of Ford V. State Of Nevada, 122 Nev. Adv. Op. 36, Denise S. Balboni
Summary Of Ford V. State Of Nevada, 122 Nev. Adv. Op. 36, Denise S. Balboni
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from jury verdict in criminal trial on grounds that prosecutors impermissibly excluded jurors based on race in violation of Batson v. Kentucky.
Beyond Absolutism: Legal Institutions In The War On Terror, Peter Margulies
Beyond Absolutism: Legal Institutions In The War On Terror, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Political Economy Of Application Fees For Indigent Criminal Defense, Wayne A. Logan, Ronald F. Wright
The Political Economy Of Application Fees For Indigent Criminal Defense, Wayne A. Logan, Ronald F. Wright
Scholarly Publications
In this article, we trace the origin and spread of state laws designed to make indigent criminal defendants pay, up-front, a portion of the costs of their state-appointed counsel. These co-pays, which can range from $10 to over $200, are part of the increasingly popular pay-as-you-go movement, requiring criminal defendants to defray the system costs of their prosecution and punishment.
On their face, such laws would appear to be a natural target of vigorous resistance by the defense bar. This turns out to be only half true, however, for it is often the leaders of public defense organizations, faced with …
An Inestimable Safeguard Gives Way To Practicality: Eliminating The Juror Who ""Refuses To Deliberate" Under Federal Rule Of Criminal Procedure 23(B)(3), Jeffrey Bellin
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Evolution And Denial: State Sentencing After Blakely And Booker, Steven L. Chanenson, Daniel F. Wilhelm
Evolution And Denial: State Sentencing After Blakely And Booker, Steven L. Chanenson, Daniel F. Wilhelm
Working Paper Series
Justice Louis Brandeis famously described the states as laboratories where individual jurisdictions can experiment with various legal strategies. In the wake of Blakley v. Washington, and United States v. Booker those laboratories have been working overtime. Since June 2004, both state legislatures and state courts have grappled with the significance of the United States Supreme Court's treatment of the Sixth Amendment in sentencing. It is unsurprising, given the extraordinary significance and potential reach of Blakely and Booker, that this Herculean task has produced divergent results.
Although there are many potential ways to sort those results, for the purposes of these …
Adult Punishment For Juvenile Offenders: Does It Reduce Crime?, Richard E. Redding
Adult Punishment For Juvenile Offenders: Does It Reduce Crime?, Richard E. Redding
Working Paper Series
This chapter discusses the research on the general and specific deterrent effects of transferring juveniles for trial in adult criminal court, identifies gaps in our knowledge base that require further research, discusses the circumstances under which effective deterrence may be achieved, and examines whether there are effective alternatives for achieving deterrence other than adult sanctions for serious juvenile offenders. As a backdrop to this analysis, the chapter first examines the role of public opinion in shaping the get tough policies, and how policy makers have misunderstood and perceived support for these policies.
Europeanizing Self-Incrimination: The Right To Remain Silent In The European Court Of Human Rights, Mark Berger
Europeanizing Self-Incrimination: The Right To Remain Silent In The European Court Of Human Rights, Mark Berger
Faculty Works
Since it came into force in September, 1953, the European Convention on Human Rights has served as a reflection of Europe's movement toward the establishment of common standards of individual human rights and freedoms. The forty-five countries that are currently signatories to the Convention are subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) which was established in 1959 as a mechanism to interpret and enforce the obligations created by the Convention. Although the Convention contains no explicit reference to a right to remain silent, and despite the differing legal systems of the contracting states, the Court …
Reflections On Standing: Challenges To Searches And Seizures In A High Technology World, José F. Anderson
Reflections On Standing: Challenges To Searches And Seizures In A High Technology World, José F. Anderson
All Faculty Scholarship
Among the profound issues that surround constitutional criminal procedure is the obscure often overlooked issue of who has standing to challenge an illegal search, seizure or confession. Privacy interests are often overlooked because without a legal status that allows a person to complain in court, there is no way to challenge whether one is constitutionally protected from personal invasions. Standing is that procedural barrier often imposed to prevent a person in a case from objecting to improper police conduct because of his or her relationship of ownership, proximity, location, or interest in an item searched or a thing seized. Although …
Standing Room Only: Why Fourth Amendment Exclusion And Standing No Longer Logically Coexist, Sherry F. Colb
Standing Room Only: Why Fourth Amendment Exclusion And Standing No Longer Logically Coexist, Sherry F. Colb
Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers
The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule provides that a criminal defendant may suppress the fruits of unreasonable searches and seizures at his prosecution. The Fourth Amendment standing requirement limits the class of criminal defendants who may invoke the exclusionary rule to those who have personally suffered a violation of their rights. This Article argues that the two doctrines are logically inconsistent with each other. The exclusionary rule rests on a foundation of deterrence that takes as its point of departure the police officer's subjective perspective of events and asks: did the information known to him justify his conduct? The standing requirement, …
Summary Of Barnhart V. State, 122 Nev. Adv. Op. 26, Robert Reid
Summary Of Barnhart V. State, 122 Nev. Adv. Op. 26, Robert Reid
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
No abstract provided.
Environmental Justice And The Role Of Criminology: An Analytical Review Of 33 Years Of Environmental Justice Research, Lisa Anne Zilney, Danielle Mcgurrin, Sammy Zahran
Environmental Justice And The Role Of Criminology: An Analytical Review Of 33 Years Of Environmental Justice Research, Lisa Anne Zilney, Danielle Mcgurrin, Sammy Zahran
Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works
An increasing number of scholars and activists have begun to tackle a variety of issues relevant to environmental justice studies. This study attempts to address the role of criminologists in this domain. The authors examine 425 environmental justice articles in 204 academic journals, representing 18 programs/departments between 1970 and 2003. First, they measure the environmental justice contributions in the literature by academic department or activist affiliation. Second, they identify the major themes in the literature as they have developed and reveal the current and future directions of environmental justice studies. Such themes include the spatial distribution of hazards, social movements, …
Multicultural Perspectives On Delinquency Etiology And Intervention, Richard E. Redding, Bruce Arrigo
Multicultural Perspectives On Delinquency Etiology And Intervention, Richard E. Redding, Bruce Arrigo
Working Paper Series
In this chapter, we consider the possible reasons for the overrepresentation of African-American youth in the juvenile and criminal justice systems. We review research on discrimination in the justice system and possible differences between African American and White youth in the key risk factors for delinquency that exist at the individual, family, and peer-group and neighborhood levels. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations for treatments and interventions aimed at preventing and reducing offending and justice system involvement among African-American youth.
Habeas Corpus And Baseball, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
Habeas Corpus And Baseball, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
Scholarly Works
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries playing baseball on Sundays was a criminal offense in many states, where police often aggressively intervened to prevent or stop baseball games from being played on the Sabbath. In 1894, “the police of the city of Brooklyn took it upon themselves to chase, club and lock up all boys and men found playing ball on Sunday,” People ex rel. Poole v. Hesterberg, 43 Misc. 510, 89 N.Y.S. 498, 499 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Kings County 1904); on two consecutive Sundays in July 1910, two professional baseball teams attempting to play in Chemung County, …
Summary Of State V. Sargent, 122 Nev. Adv. Op. 18, Michael Pandullo
Summary Of State V. Sargent, 122 Nev. Adv. Op. 18, Michael Pandullo
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court decided whether justice courts have jurisdiction to order a defendant to personally appear at a preliminary hearing when the defendant has filed a waiver of personal appearance and counsel has appeared on his behalf.
Summary Of Herman V. State, 122 Nev. Adv. Op. 17, Michael Pandullo
Summary Of Herman V. State, 122 Nev. Adv. Op. 17, Michael Pandullo
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
In this case, the Court considered two issues: (1) whether DNA evidence voluntarily submitted to a public facility to absolve a defendant of a crime may be used in an unrelated criminal prosecution, and (2) whether reading a presentence report to a jury during the sentencing phase is error when the report cannot be made part of the public record.
Summary Of Redeker V. Dist. Ct., 122 Nev. Adv. Op. 14, Brandon P. Kemble
Summary Of Redeker V. Dist. Ct., 122 Nev. Adv. Op. 14, Brandon P. Kemble
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Arie R. Redeker, facing a capital murder trial, made a petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging the alleged aggravating circumstances that he was convicted of a felony involving the use or threat of violence to the person of another.
Justice Story Cuts The Gordian Knot Of Hung Jury Instructions, George C. Thomas Iii, Mark Greenbaum
Justice Story Cuts The Gordian Knot Of Hung Jury Instructions, George C. Thomas Iii, Mark Greenbaum
Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers
Constitutional law grows more complex over time. The complexity is due, in large part, to the rule of stare decisis. When faced with precedents that it does not wish to follow, the Court usually distinguishes the case before it. Thus, the constitutional landscape is littered with cases that do not fit well together. Navigating past these shoals is often difficult for courts following the Supreme Court’s lead. One example is the law governing instructions that a trial judge can give a deadlocked jury in a criminal case. The right to a jury trial entails the right to have the jury …
Summary Of Moore V. State, 122 Nev. Adv. Op. 4, Stephanie Hamrick
Summary Of Moore V. State, 122 Nev. Adv. Op. 4, Stephanie Hamrick
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appellant Moore was convicted of fraudulent use of a credit card based on an incident that took place in a Las Vegas Wal-Mart. His suspicious behavior2 while shopping attracted the attention of a loss prevention specialist. The loss prevention specialist suspected Moore might attempt to purchase goods with a credit card, and instructed a cashier to contact management if Moore presented a credit card without proper identification. Moore brought over $300 worth of goods to the cashier’s register and presented a credit card. When Moore could not produce identification, the cashier summoned a manager who took the credit card to …
The Legality Of The Nsa Wiretapping Program, Evan Tsen Lee
The Legality Of The Nsa Wiretapping Program, Evan Tsen Lee
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
"True Threats" And The Issue Of Intent, Paul T. Crane
"True Threats" And The Issue Of Intent, Paul T. Crane
Law Faculty Publications
This Note will proceed in five Parts. Part I will serve as a short introduction to the category of true threats and its place within First Amendment jurisprudence. Part II will examine the history of true threats and intent leading up to Virginia v. Black, highlighting the foundational opinion of Watts v. United States and the various intent approaches that became available in its wake. Part III will discuss the potential interpretations of the language in Black, and Part IV will explain how lower courts have treated the Court's definition of true threats in Black. Finally, Part V will address …
Reformulating The Miranda Warnings In Light Of Contemporary Law And Understandings, Mark A. Godsey
Reformulating The Miranda Warnings In Light Of Contemporary Law And Understandings, Mark A. Godsey
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
Since Miranda v. Arizona was decided in 1966, much scholarly attention has been devoted to both the theoretical underpinnings and the real world impact of that decision. Little attention, however, has been paid to the substance or content of the warnings. The Supreme Court has often stated that the Miranda warnings requirement is a prophylactic rule that can change and evolve. However, in spite of 40 years of legal developments and practical experience, the content of these famous four warnings has never been modified or even been subjected to systematic scrutiny.
This Article proposes that the substance of the Miranda …
The Trial Of Bigger Thomas: Race, Gender, And Trespass, Bennett Capers
The Trial Of Bigger Thomas: Race, Gender, And Trespass, Bennett Capers
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Sentencing Guideline Law And Practice In A Post-Booker World: Introduction, Michael Vitiello
Sentencing Guideline Law And Practice In A Post-Booker World: Introduction, Michael Vitiello
McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles
No abstract provided.
Innocent Of A Capital Crime: Parallels Between Innocence Of A Crime And Innocence Of The Death Penalty, Linda Carter
Innocent Of A Capital Crime: Parallels Between Innocence Of A Crime And Innocence Of The Death Penalty, Linda Carter
McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles
No abstract provided.
Police Prosecution In Rhode Island: The Unauthorized Practice Of Law, Andrew Horwitz, John R. Grasso
Police Prosecution In Rhode Island: The Unauthorized Practice Of Law, Andrew Horwitz, John R. Grasso
Law Faculty Scholarship
Every day in Rhode Island, police officers are practicing law without a license in both the District Court and the Traffic Tribunal. They do so with the full stamp of approval of the judges before whom they appear, despite the fact that the unauthorized practice of law is a crime in Rhode Island, as it is in every other state in the country. While one can certainly speculate about reasons why this practice has developed, there is nothing in any published decision of the Supreme Court of Rhode Island or in any state statute that appears to permit or justify …
Multicultural Feminism: Assessing Systemic Fault In A Provocative Context, Camille Nelson
Multicultural Feminism: Assessing Systemic Fault In A Provocative Context, Camille Nelson
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
INTRODUCTION Strictly speaking, the cultural defense is really no defense at all. Instead, it is the moniker attached by defense attorneys to their advocacy which seeks to personalize the accused in one of two ways: First by injecting a reasonable doubt into the mens rea intent requirement - this would result in acquittal, or second, by contextualizing an affirmative defense, like provocation, by the provision of cultural information about the accused - this would result in mitigated sentencing. Central to defense attorneys' uses of the cultural defense is the criminal defendant's perceived "foreignness." This much has been recognized by scholars …
A Tribute To Professor Charles J. Ogletree, Jr., Roger Fairfax
A Tribute To Professor Charles J. Ogletree, Jr., Roger Fairfax
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
I recall vividly how, as a junior at Harvard College, I landed a coveted position on Professor Ogletree's office hours list. My ostensible purpose for taking an office hours slot away from a deserving law school student was to discuss the college seminar paper I was writing on the District of Columbia statehood movement. Although I did leave that meeting with several fruitful research leads, I was much more satisfied with achieving my true aim-to meet in person this man about whom I had heard so many wonderful things. The professor did not disappoint. As I sat in his office-the …
Article 85: If Someone Is Wrongfully Detained Or Convicted, What Recourse Does He Have? What Compensation Is He Entitled To? Is This Monetary, And If So, Where Does The Money Come From? What Should The Court Take Into Consideration When Deciding On Compensation?, Robert C. Bliss
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
The Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines Project: A Simplified Economic Crimes Guideline, Model Sentencing Guidelines §2b1.1, Frank O. Bowman Iii
The Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines Project: A Simplified Economic Crimes Guideline, Model Sentencing Guidelines §2b1.1, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Faculty Publications
This Article is the third of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed to illustrate the feasibility and advantages of a simplified approach to federal sentencing proposed by the Constitution Project Sentencing Initiative. The Model Sentencing Guidelines and the Constitution Project report are all to be published in Volume 18, Number 5 of the Federal Sentencing Reporter. The project is described in an essay titled 'Tis a Gift To Be Simple: A Model Reform of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, available on SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=927929.
The Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines Project: A Simplified Sentencing Grid, Model Sentencing Guidelines §1.1, Frank O. Bowman Iii
The Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines Project: A Simplified Sentencing Grid, Model Sentencing Guidelines §1.1, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Faculty Publications
This Article is the first of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed to illustrate the feasibility and advantages of a simplified approach to federal sentencing proposed by the Constitution Project Sentencing Initiative. The Model Sentencing Guidelines and the Constitution Project report are all to be published in Volume 18, Number 5 of the Federal Sentencing Reporter. The project is described in an essay titled "'Tis a Gift to be Simple: A Model Reform of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines", available on SSRN at http://ssrn.com/abstract=927929.