Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (15)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (9)
- University of Richmond (5)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
-
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Mercer University School of Law (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Death penalty (8)
- Capital punishment sentencing (6)
- Capital punishment (5)
- Criminal law (5)
- Habeas corpus (5)
-
- Capital punishment of offenders with mental disabilities (3)
- Criminal procedure (3)
- First Supreme Court arguments (3)
- Fourth Amendment (3)
- Supreme Court advocacy (3)
- Terrorism (3)
- ABA guidelines (2)
- Capital post-conviction proceedings (2)
- Comity (2)
- Death-sentence appeals (2)
- Double jeopardy (2)
- Dual sovereignty (2)
- Eighth amendment (2)
- Exclusionary rule (2)
- Fifth Amendment (2)
- Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases (2)
- Law enforcement (2)
- Searches (2)
- Seizure (2)
- Self-incrimination (2)
- September 11 (2)
- 9/11 (1)
- AEDPA (1)
- Abner Louima (1)
- Adjudication (1)
- Publication
-
- Capital Defense Journal (10)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (8)
- University of Richmond Law Review (5)
- Oklahoma Law Review (4)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (4)
-
- Mercer Law Review (2)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- Villanova Law Review (2)
- Washington International Law Journal (2)
- Washington Law Review (2)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (2)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- International Bulletin of Political Psychology (1)
- Journal of Law and Health (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (1)
- The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- University of Miami Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (1)
- William Mitchell Law Review (1)
Articles 31 - 57 of 57
Full-Text Articles in Law
Brown V. Lee 319 F.3d 162 (4th Cir. 2003)
Brown V. Lee 319 F.3d 162 (4th Cir. 2003)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Fields V. Oklahoma 123 S. Ct. 1208 (2003)
Fields V. Oklahoma 123 S. Ct. 1208 (2003)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Va. Code Ann. S 8.01-654.2 Va. Code Ann. S 18.2-10 Va. Code Ann. S 19.2-175 Va. Code Ann. S 19.2-264.3:1 Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-264.3:1.1 Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-264.3:1.2 Va. Code Ann. S 19.2-264.3:3 Va. Code Ann. S 19.2-264.4*
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Assassination, The War On Terrorism, And The Constitution, Rodney A. Smolla
Assassination, The War On Terrorism, And The Constitution, Rodney A. Smolla
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Epistemology Of Prediction: Future Dangerousness Testimony And Intellectual Due Process, Erica Beecher-Monas
The Epistemology Of Prediction: Future Dangerousness Testimony And Intellectual Due Process, Erica Beecher-Monas
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dusenbery V. United States: Setting The Standard For Adequate Notice, W. Alexander Burnett
Dusenbery V. United States: Setting The Standard For Adequate Notice, W. Alexander Burnett
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law—Scarlet Letters: Traffic Stops Based On “Special” License Plates Must Follow The Letter Of The Constitution—State V. Henning, Piper Kenney Webb, Bruce H. Hanley
Criminal Law—Scarlet Letters: Traffic Stops Based On “Special” License Plates Must Follow The Letter Of The Constitution—State V. Henning, Piper Kenney Webb, Bruce H. Hanley
William Mitchell Law Review
The Minnesota Supreme Court recently addressed whether a Minnesota statute authorizing law enforcement to stop motorists based solely on the presence of special license plates issued primarily to repeat drunken drivers is proper under the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. In State v. Henning, the court held the statute unconstitutional by a 4-3 decision. Finding no persuasive reason to do otherwise, the court struck down the legislature's attempt to eliminate the requirement that law enforcement have “reasonable articulable suspicion” to conduct an investigatory stop of a motor vehicle. This article provides a brief survey of similar laws in other states …
Improving The Kangaroo Courts: A Proposal For Reform In Evaluating Juveniles' Waiver Of Miranda, Kimberly Larson
Improving The Kangaroo Courts: A Proposal For Reform In Evaluating Juveniles' Waiver Of Miranda, Kimberly Larson
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Every Breath You Take, Every Move You Make, I'Ll Be Watching You: The Use Of Face Recognition Technology, Bridget Mallon
Every Breath You Take, Every Move You Make, I'Ll Be Watching You: The Use Of Face Recognition Technology, Bridget Mallon
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Criminal Law And The Crime-Fraud Exception: Disclosure Of Privileged Conversations And Documents Should Not Be Compelled Without The Government's Factual Foundation Being Tested By The Crucible Of Meaningful Adversarial Testing, Thomas M. Dibiagio
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Retribution For Rats: Cooperation, Punishment, And Atonement, Michael A. Simons
Retribution For Rats: Cooperation, Punishment, And Atonement, Michael A. Simons
Vanderbilt Law Review
To mobsters, he is a "rat"; to drug dealers, a "snitch." To school children, he is a "tattletale"; to corporate executives, a "whistle- blower." To cops, he is an "informant"; to prosecutors, a "cooperator." By whatever name he is known, the person who betrays his associates to the authorities is almost universally reviled. In movies, on television, in literature, the cooperator embodies all that society holds in contempt: he is disloyal, deceitful, greedy, selfish, and weak. The cooperator, though, has long been a mainstay of our criminal justice system. For centuries, criminal defendants have received leniency in return for testimony …
Two Sides Of A "Sargasso Sea": Successive Prosecution For The "Same Offence" In The United States And The United Kingdom, Lissa Griffin
Two Sides Of A "Sargasso Sea": Successive Prosecution For The "Same Offence" In The United States And The United Kingdom, Lissa Griffin
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments On "The Need For Comity", James P. Jones
Comments On "The Need For Comity", James P. Jones
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Blending Criminal Procedure At The Ad Hoc Tribunals, William A. Schabas
Blending Criminal Procedure At The Ad Hoc Tribunals, William A. Schabas
Michigan Journal of International Law
Review of International Criminal Evidence by Richard May & Marieke Wierda
Protection Against Unwarranted Searches And Seizures Of Corporate Premises Under Article 8 Of The European Convention On Human Rights: The Colas Est Sa V. France Approach, Marius Emberland
Michigan Journal of International Law
In this Article, the author considers the judgment delivered April 16, 2002, by the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Colas Est SA v. France. The judgment concerned the interpretation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which provides: (1) Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. (2) There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests …
Criminal Law: The Oklahoma Court Of Criminal Appeals' Procedural And Substantive Application Of Ring V. Arizona To Oklahoma's Capital Sentencing Scheme, Seth S. Branham
Criminal Law: The Oklahoma Court Of Criminal Appeals' Procedural And Substantive Application Of Ring V. Arizona To Oklahoma's Capital Sentencing Scheme, Seth S. Branham
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cultural Context Matters: Terry's "Seesaw Effect", Frank Rudy Cooper
Cultural Context Matters: Terry's "Seesaw Effect", Frank Rudy Cooper
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure: Searching High And Low For A Search In Kyllo: Justice Scalia Reaffirms Core Protections Of The Fourth Amendment, Scott Byrd
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
By Any Means Necessary: Evaluating The Effectiveness Of Texas' Dna Testing Law In The Adjudication Of Free-Standing Claims Of Actual Innocence, Daryl E. Harris
By Any Means Necessary: Evaluating The Effectiveness Of Texas' Dna Testing Law In The Adjudication Of Free-Standing Claims Of Actual Innocence, Daryl E. Harris
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
Abstract forthcoming.
Enemy Combatants, The Courts, And The Constitution, Roberto Iraola
Enemy Combatants, The Courts, And The Constitution, Roberto Iraola
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
In The Wake Of Kyllo V. United States: The Future Of Thermal Imaging Cameras, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 507 (2003), Paul Kleppetsch
In The Wake Of Kyllo V. United States: The Future Of Thermal Imaging Cameras, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 507 (2003), Paul Kleppetsch
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mandamus As A Weapon Of "Class Warfare" In Sixth Amendment Jurisprudence: A Case Comment On United States V. Santos, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 733 (2003), John F. Costello Jr.
Mandamus As A Weapon Of "Class Warfare" In Sixth Amendment Jurisprudence: A Case Comment On United States V. Santos, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 733 (2003), John F. Costello Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Death By Any Other Name: The Federal Government's Inconsistent Treatment Of Drugs Used In Lethal Injections And Physician-Assisted Suicide, Colin Miller
Journal of Law and Health
While the FDA is under no legal obligation to regulate the drugs used in executions, these recent developments certainly create a moral imperative requiring review. This paper will argue that the federal government cannot consistently refrain from regulating lethal injection drugs while arguing for prosecution of those prescribing drugs to be used by patients in assisted suicide. Part II will look at the opinions in Chaney and the factors behind the FDA's decision not to regulate the drugs used in executions. Part III will look at Oregon's Death with Dignity Act and its authorization by the Supreme Court. Parts IV-VI …
Nothing Less Than The Dignity Of Man: Evolving Standards, Botched Executions And Utah's Controversial Use Of The Firing Squad , Christopher Q. Cutler
Nothing Less Than The Dignity Of Man: Evolving Standards, Botched Executions And Utah's Controversial Use Of The Firing Squad , Christopher Q. Cutler
Cleveland State Law Review
While outrage boils to the surface when Utah uses its firing squad option, there is little substantive legal development concerning the firing squad's use. Few cases have challenged the firing squad's constitutionality. This article discusses the legal and political implications of the firing squad. Using the Supreme Court's everdeveloping Eighth Amendment jurisprudence as a guide, this article discusses whether the firing squad, both historically and in its present application, passes constitutional muster. Beyond those factors that trigger constitutional protection, this article discusses those elements of the firing squad's use which define society's humanity and demonstrate our dignity. In the end, …
The Need For Comity: A Proposal For Federal Court Review Of Suppression Issues In The Dual Sovereignty Context After The Antiterrorism And Effective Death Penalty Act Of 1996, Carrie M. Bowden
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Prostitution Of Lying In Wait, H. Mitchell Caldwell
The Prostitution Of Lying In Wait, H. Mitchell Caldwell
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Anger And Intent For Murder: The Supreme Court Decisions In R. V. Parent, Joanne Klineberg
Anger And Intent For Murder: The Supreme Court Decisions In R. V. Parent, Joanne Klineberg
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
In R v. Parent, the Supreme Court of Canada recently held that intense anger alone is not, of itself, a defence to murder, although anger does play a role in reducing murder to manslaughter in connection with the defence of provocation. The Court's brief decision ignores twenty years of contrary jurisprudence and fails to provide detailed reasons for its conclusion, resulting in uncertainty about the scope and application of the decision. In this article, the author explores the relationship between anger and intent for murder, and outlines some possible arguments the Court could have relied on that would have provided …