Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (74)
- University of Georgia School of Law (16)
- University of Michigan Law School (13)
- University of Washington School of Law (8)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (7)
-
- William & Mary Law School (6)
- Mercer University School of Law (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- University of the Pacific (4)
- Georgia State University College of Law (3)
- Hamline University (3)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (3)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- DePaul University (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- New York (25)
- Touro (23)
- Sixth Amendment (17)
- Fourth Amendment (15)
- Due process (13)
-
- Constitution (11)
- Evidence (11)
- Law review (11)
- Search and seizure (11)
- Supreme Court (11)
- Confrontation Clause (10)
- Law (10)
- Murder (9)
- Right to counsel (9)
- United States (9)
- Court of Appeals (7)
- Crawford v. Washington (7)
- Criminal (7)
- Criminal procedure (7)
- Effective assistance of counsel (7)
- Fifth Amendment (7)
- New York State Constitution (7)
- Probable cause (7)
- Review (7)
- Warrant (7)
- CPL (6)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Death penalty (6)
- Drugs (6)
- Fourth amendment (6)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (74)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (15)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (6)
- Mercer Law Review (5)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (5)
-
- Washington Law Review (5)
- McGeorge Law Review (4)
- Michigan Law Review (4)
- Notre Dame Law Review (4)
- Catholic University Law Review (3)
- Florida Law Review (3)
- Georgia State University Law Review (3)
- Hamline Law Review (3)
- Nevada Law Journal (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (3)
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (2)
- Oklahoma Law Review (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- Villanova Law Review (2)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (2)
- William & Mary Law Review (2)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- DePaul Magazine (1)
- Georgia Law Review (1)
- Golden Gate University Law Review (1)
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (1)
Articles 31 - 60 of 184
Full-Text Articles in Law
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People V. Barnville, David Schoenhaar
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People V. Barnville, David Schoenhaar
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Cespedes, Kathleen Egan
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Cespedes, Kathleen Egan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People V. Butler, Courtney Weinberger
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People V. Butler, Courtney Weinberger
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Court, New York County, People V. James, Nicole Compas
Criminal Court, New York County, People V. James, Nicole Compas
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Queens County, People V. Michaelides, Christin Harris
Supreme Court, Queens County, People V. Michaelides, Christin Harris
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Kings County, People V. Miller, Courtney Weinberger
Supreme Court, Kings County, People V. Miller, Courtney Weinberger
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Kings County, People V. Chapman, Kerri Grzymala
Supreme Court, Kings County, People V. Chapman, Kerri Grzymala
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, First Department, People V. Ramirez, Nicole Compas
Appellate Division, First Department, People V. Ramirez, Nicole Compas
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Vasquez, Jessica Goodwin
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Vasquez, Jessica Goodwin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People Ex Rel. Furde V. New York City Dep't Of Correction, Adam D'Antonio
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People Ex Rel. Furde V. New York City Dep't Of Correction, Adam D'Antonio
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, Third Department, People V. Rivette, Michele Kligman
Appellate Division, Third Department, People V. Rivette, Michele Kligman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
District Court, Nassau County, People V. Yaghoubi, David Schoenhaar
District Court, Nassau County, People V. Yaghoubi, David Schoenhaar
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Principles For Establishment Of A Rule Of Law Criminal Justice System, William M. Cohen
Principles For Establishment Of A Rule Of Law Criminal Justice System, William M. Cohen
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Not So Fast: I Have Been Deprived Of My Right To Counsel, Elias Arroyo
Not So Fast: I Have Been Deprived Of My Right To Counsel, Elias Arroyo
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Putting The Cat Back In The Bag: Involuntary Confessions And Self-Incrimination, Joseph A. Iemma
Putting The Cat Back In The Bag: Involuntary Confessions And Self-Incrimination, Joseph A. Iemma
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination: Are Underlying Questions About A Pending Conviction On Appeal A Violation Of A Defendant's Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination?, Macdonald R. Drane Iv
Self-Incrimination: Are Underlying Questions About A Pending Conviction On Appeal A Violation Of A Defendant's Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination?, Macdonald R. Drane Iv
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy: A Resentencing Game, Deirdre Cicciaro
Double Jeopardy: A Resentencing Game, Deirdre Cicciaro
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justification For Police Intrusions, Corey Rashkover
Justification For Police Intrusions, Corey Rashkover
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interpreting Search Incident To Arrest In New York: Past, Present, And Future, Jacqueline Iaquinta
Interpreting Search Incident To Arrest In New York: Past, Present, And Future, Jacqueline Iaquinta
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizures: Constitutionally Protected Or Discretionary Police Work?, Jaren Fernan
Search And Seizures: Constitutionally Protected Or Discretionary Police Work?, Jaren Fernan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Seize First, Search Later: The Hunt For Digital Evidence, Paige Bartholomew
Seize First, Search Later: The Hunt For Digital Evidence, Paige Bartholomew
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Retroactive Change In The Law To Punish A Defendant, George Schoenwaelder
Retroactive Change In The Law To Punish A Defendant, George Schoenwaelder
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Extradition - International Law - The United States Night Circuit Court Of Appeals Holds Government-Sponsored Abduction Abroad Is Not A Lawful Alternative To Extradition. United States V. Verdugo-Urquidez, 939 F.2d 1341 (9th Cir. 1991), Thomas L. Horan
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Confessions And The Right To Silence In Japan, Daniel H. Foote
Confessions And The Right To Silence In Japan, Daniel H. Foote
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law And Procedure, Aaron J. Campbell
Criminal Law And Procedure, Aaron J. Campbell
University of Richmond Law Review
This article aims to provide a succinct review of noteworthy cases in the areas of criminal law and procedure that the Supreme Court of Virginia and the Court of Appeals of Virginia decided this past year. Instead of covering every ruling or procedural point in a particular case, this article focuses on the "take- away" of the holdings with the most precedential value. This article also summarizes significant changes to criminal law and procedure enacted by the 2014 Virginia General Assembly.
Virginia's Gap Between Punishment And Culpability: Re-Examining Self-Defense Law And Battered Women's Syndrome, Kendall Hamilton
Virginia's Gap Between Punishment And Culpability: Re-Examining Self-Defense Law And Battered Women's Syndrome, Kendall Hamilton
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Frame Of Reference And Other Problems, Richard D. Friedman, Jeffrey L. Fisher
The Frame Of Reference And Other Problems, Richard D. Friedman, Jeffrey L. Fisher
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
George argues that, centuries ago, jurists did not distinguish between testimonial and nontestimonial hearsay, and so the distinction cannot be a historically well-grounded basis for modern confrontation doctrine. The argument proceeds from an inaccurate frame of reference. When the confrontation right developed, principally in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and English defendants—Raleigh among them—demanded that adverse witnesses be brought face to face with them, they were making a procedural assertion as to how witnesses must give their testimony. (Giving testimony is what witnesses in litigation do.) Rarely did they phrase this claim in terms of hearsay, for the simple reason …
Come Back To The Boat, Justice Breyer!, Richard D. Friedman
Come Back To The Boat, Justice Breyer!, Richard D. Friedman
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
I want to get Justice Breyer back on the right side of Confrontation Clause issues. In 1999, in Lilly v. Virginia, he wrote a farsighted concurrence, making him one of the first members of the Supreme Court to recognize the inadequacy of the then-prevailing doctrine of the Confrontation Clause. That doctrine, first announced in Ohio v. Roberts, was dependent on hearsay law and made judicial assessments of reliability determinative. In Crawford v. Washington, the Court was presented with an alternative approach, making the key inquiry whether the statement in question was testimonial in nature. During the oral …
Speedy Trial As A Viable Challenge To Chronic Underfunding In Indigent-Defense Systems, Emily Rose
Speedy Trial As A Viable Challenge To Chronic Underfunding In Indigent-Defense Systems, Emily Rose
Michigan Law Review
Across the country, underresourced indigent-defense systems create delays in taking cases to trial at both the state and federal levels. Attempts to increase funding for indigent defense by bringing ineffective assistance of counsel claims have been thwarted by high procedural and substantive hurdles, and consequently these attempts have failed to bring significant change. This Note argues that, because ineffective assistance of counsel litigation is most likely a dead end for system-wide reform, indigent defenders should challenge the constitutionality of underfunding based on the Sixth Amendment guarantee of speedy trial. Existing speedy trial jurisprudence suggests that the overworking and furloughing of …
Ryan V. Gonzalez And The Potential Elimination Of The Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Post Conviction Failsafe, Kathleen Carlson
Ryan V. Gonzalez And The Potential Elimination Of The Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Post Conviction Failsafe, Kathleen Carlson
Florida Law Review
Recently, the United States Supreme Court addressed in Ryan v. Gonzales “whether the incompetence of a state prisoner requires suspension of the prisoner’s federal habeas corpus proceedings.” In a unanimous decision, the Court held that “the Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Sixth Circuits both erred in holding that district courts must stay federal habeas proceedings when petitioners are adjudged incompetent.” The decision leaves unanswered questions with regard to a petitioner’s ability to protect himself from ineffective or incompetent counsel both before and during the habeas proceeding.