Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (79)
- Selected Works (19)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (18)
- University of Richmond (13)
- Georgetown University Law Center (11)
-
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (7)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (7)
- SelectedWorks (6)
- University of Baltimore Law (6)
- University of Georgia School of Law (6)
- Seattle University School of Law (5)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- St. Mary's University (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- The University of Akron (3)
- University of Miami Law School (3)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Pace University (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (69)
- Indiana Law Journal (17)
- Scholarly Works (14)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (11)
- University of Richmond Law Review (10)
-
- Richard Daniel Klein (9)
- All Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (7)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (7)
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Articles (5)
- Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Pepperdine Law Review (4)
- Akron Law Review (3)
- Cleveland State Law Review (3)
- Martin A. Schwartz (3)
- NYLS Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Publications (3)
- Seattle University Law Review (3)
- University of Miami Law Review (3)
- American Indian Law Journal (2)
- Erwin Chemerinsky (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (2)
- Northwestern University Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- American University Criminal Law Brief (1)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Andrea D. Lyon (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 211 - 240 of 245
Full-Text Articles in Law
Modern Confession Law After Duckworth V. Eagan: What's The Use Of Explaining?, Julia C. Weissman
Modern Confession Law After Duckworth V. Eagan: What's The Use Of Explaining?, Julia C. Weissman
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Pattern Of Racketeering Element Of Rico Liability, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
The Pattern Of Racketeering Element Of Rico Liability, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Where To Draw The Guideline: Factoring The Fruits Of Illegal Searches Into Sentencing Guidelines Calculations, Cheryl G. Bader, David S. Douglas
Where To Draw The Guideline: Factoring The Fruits Of Illegal Searches Into Sentencing Guidelines Calculations, Cheryl G. Bader, David S. Douglas
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Doctrine Of Inevitable Discovery: A Plea For Reasonable Limitations, Steven P. Grossman
The Doctrine Of Inevitable Discovery: A Plea For Reasonable Limitations, Steven P. Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
In reinstating the Iowa murder conviction of Robert Williams, the Supreme Court accepted explicitly for the first time the doctrine of inevitable discovery. Applied for some time by state and federal courts, the doctrine of inevitable discovery is a means by which evidence obtained illegally can still be admitted against defendants in criminal cases. Unfortunately, the Court chose to adopt the doctrine without any of the safeguards necessary to insure that the deterrent impact of the exclusionary rule would be preserved, and in a form that is subject to and almost invites abuse.
This article warns of the danger to …
Does Plight Make Right: The Battered Woman Syndrome, Expert Testimony And The Law Of Self-Defense, Mira Mihajlovich
Does Plight Make Right: The Battered Woman Syndrome, Expert Testimony And The Law Of Self-Defense, Mira Mihajlovich
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Whatever Happened To The "Right To Know?": The Right Of Access To Government-Controlled Information Since Richmond Newspapers On Those Who Don't, Michael Hayes
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure In The Rehnquist Court: Has The Rehnquisition Begun?, Craig M. Bradley
Criminal Procedure In The Rehnquist Court: Has The Rehnquisition Begun?, Craig M. Bradley
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Preliminary Screening Of Prosecutorial Access To Death Qualified Juries: A Missing Constitutional Link, F. Thomas Schornhorst
Preliminary Screening Of Prosecutorial Access To Death Qualified Juries: A Missing Constitutional Link, F. Thomas Schornhorst
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Citizen's Arrests And The Fourth Amendment--A Fresh Perspective, Howard E. Wallin
Citizen's Arrests And The Fourth Amendment--A Fresh Perspective, Howard E. Wallin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Filling In The Gap Left By Congress: What Is The Statute Of Limitations For Private Rico Claims?, Barbara Black
Filling In The Gap Left By Congress: What Is The Statute Of Limitations For Private Rico Claims?, Barbara Black
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
In increasing number, victims of business fraud are bringing lawsuits under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Since the statute does not set out a time limit for bringing suit, the courts must determine the appropriate statute of limitations. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. v. Crown Life Insurance Co. illustrates the difficulties Congress creates for the courts when it fails to provide a limitations period. RICO makes it illegal to engage in a "pattern of racketeering activity" for certain illegal purposes. A "pattern of racketeering activity" consists of at least two acts of "racketeering activity" within a ten-year period. …
The "Good Faith Exception" Cases: Reasonable Exercises In Futility, Craig M. Bradley
The "Good Faith Exception" Cases: Reasonable Exercises In Futility, Craig M. Bradley
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Death Penalty Cases: Shaping Substantive Criminal Law, David R. Schieferstein
The Death Penalty Cases: Shaping Substantive Criminal Law, David R. Schieferstein
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Testimonial Immunity And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: A Study In Isomorphism, Peter Lushing
Testimonial Immunity And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: A Study In Isomorphism, Peter Lushing
Articles
This Article accepts and will develop the Court's isomorphic theory of immunity and privilege, and will show why Portash is nonetheless correct in result. A case for a broadened view of the privilege, partially because of the availability of testimonial immunity, will be made. Apftlbaum will be shown to be incorrect in result. This Article will also analyze the problem of immunized testimony and perjury by inconsistent statement, a problem faced once by the Court but left unresolved. Finally, this Article will discuss the constitutional requirements of an immunity statute, and consider an immunity case presently pending before the Supreme …
Perils Of The Rulemaking Process: The Development, Application, And Unconstitutionality Of Rule 804(B)(3)'S Penal Interest Exception, Peter W. Tague
Perils Of The Rulemaking Process: The Development, Application, And Unconstitutionality Of Rule 804(B)(3)'S Penal Interest Exception, Peter W. Tague
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
As the culmination of a decade of rulemaking, in 1975 Congress enacted the Federal Rules of Evidence, which include in rule 804(b)(3) an exception to the hearsay rule that allows federal courts to admit statements against penal interest. Having reviewed previously unpublished memoranda and nonpublic tape recordings of the deliberations of the Advisory and Standing Committees to the Judicial Conference and the Special Subcommittee on Reform of Federal Criminal Laws of the House Judiciary Committee, Professor Tague explores the development of rule 804(b)(3), one of the more controversial rules that emerged from that rulemaking process. After analyzing rule 804(b)(3) and …
Faces Without Features: The Surface Validity Of Criminal Inferences, Peter Lushing
Faces Without Features: The Surface Validity Of Criminal Inferences, Peter Lushing
Articles
This article will offer nonempirical grounds to show that instructed inferences operate as the dissenters believe, at least when the instruction does not explicitly refer to the evidence at trial, but to occurrences in general.
Federal Habeas Corpus And Ineffective Representation Of Counsel: The Supreme Court Has Work To Do, Peter W. Tague
Federal Habeas Corpus And Ineffective Representation Of Counsel: The Supreme Court Has Work To Do, Peter W. Tague
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The availability of federal habeas corpus relief for state criminal defendants has always borne a complex relationship to state rules barring defendants from litigating constitutional claims in state court because of procedural defaults in raising those claims. The Warren Court's landmark attempt to resolve this relationship was the 1963 decision in Fay v. Noia, which asserted that a state procedural forfeiture rule could not bar federal habeas review of a constitutional claim unless the defendant had "deliberately bypassed" the procedural opportunity to raise the claim; the Court defined "deliberate bypass" in terms of a defendant's intentional and voluntary relinquishment of …
Presuming Lawyers Competent To Protect Fundamental Rights: Is It An Affordable Fiction?, Robert G. Lawson
Presuming Lawyers Competent To Protect Fundamental Rights: Is It An Affordable Fiction?, Robert G. Lawson
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This article explores the ramifications of Wainwright v. Sykes, a case decided before the Supreme Court of the United States in 1977. The broad question before the Court in Sykes concerned the extent to which state prisoners should have access to federal court by use of the writ of habeas corpus. The narrow issue before the Court concerned the impact on a prisoner's claim for habeas relief of procedural defaults (such as a failure to object to evidence, a failure to perfect an appeal, etc.) that occur in the state proceeding under attack. In considering these important issues Justice …