Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Criminal Law

1973

Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 151 - 168 of 168

Full-Text Articles in Law

British Borstal Training System, The , John Warder, Reg Wilson Jan 1973

British Borstal Training System, The , John Warder, Reg Wilson

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.


Book Reviews Jan 1973

Book Reviews

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.


Perspectives On Innovation And Reform In Criminal Justice - Forward, Marvin E. Wolfgang Jan 1973

Perspectives On Innovation And Reform In Criminal Justice - Forward, Marvin E. Wolfgang

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.


Ideology And Criminal Justice Policy: Some Current Issues, Walter B. Miller Jan 1973

Ideology And Criminal Justice Policy: Some Current Issues, Walter B. Miller

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.


The Prosecutor's Role In The Urban Court System: The Case For Management Consciousness, William A. Hamilton, Charles R. Work Jan 1973

The Prosecutor's Role In The Urban Court System: The Case For Management Consciousness, William A. Hamilton, Charles R. Work

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.


Information Overload: Peace Or War With The Computer, Leslie T. Wilkins Jan 1973

Information Overload: Peace Or War With The Computer, Leslie T. Wilkins

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.


Corrections And Simple Justice, John P. Conrad Jan 1973

Corrections And Simple Justice, John P. Conrad

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.


Argersinger V. Hamlin - Right To Counsel Expanded To Include Offenses Which May Result In Imprisonment, Oliver Claypool Jr. Jan 1973

Argersinger V. Hamlin - Right To Counsel Expanded To Include Offenses Which May Result In Imprisonment, Oliver Claypool Jr.

Cleveland State Law Review

On June 12, 1972, The United States Supreme Court held in Argersinger v. Hamlin, ... that absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person may be imprisoned for any offense, whether classified as petty, misdemeanor, or felony, unless he was represented by counsel at his trial. Although, all of the ramifications of this decision have not yet been felt, American Bar Association president, Robert W. Meserve has estimated that the decision will require the legal profession to provide representation in some additional two to four million cases per year for indigent defendants alone.


Kentucky Penal Code: The Culpable Mental States And Related Matters, Robert G. Lawson Jan 1973

Kentucky Penal Code: The Culpable Mental States And Related Matters, Robert G. Lawson

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

All efforts to improve the criminal law of this commonwealth prior to 1972 were directed toward relatively narrow problems. Legislative changes in the law had been made from time to time, almost always without conscious regard for the manner in which related principles were affected. Defects of considerable importance resulted. The criminal law became substantially disjointed and difficult of administration. Unjust and inequitable treatment of offenders was more prominent than its opposite. In some instances sanctions were clearly inadequate for the type of behavior sought to be controlled. In others they were grossly disproportionate to the social harms used to …


The Reincarnation Of The Death Penalty: Is It Possible?, Yale Kamisar Jan 1973

The Reincarnation Of The Death Penalty: Is It Possible?, Yale Kamisar

Articles

Fifty years ago Clarence Darrow, probably the greatest criminal defense lawyer in American history and a leading opponent of capital punishment, observed: The question of capital punishment has been the subject of endless discussion and will probably never be settled so long as men believe in punishment. Some states have abolished and then reinstated it; some have enjoyed capital punishment for long periods of time and finally prohibited the use of it. The reasons why it cannot be settled are plain. There is first of all no agreement as to the objects of punishment. Next there is no way to …


The Evolution Of Drug Legislation In Kentucky, Dale H. Farabee Jan 1973

The Evolution Of Drug Legislation In Kentucky, Dale H. Farabee

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Kentucky Penal Code: The Culpable Mental States And Related Matters, Robert G. Lawson Jan 1973

Kentucky Penal Code: The Culpable Mental States And Related Matters, Robert G. Lawson

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Authorized Dispositions Of Offenders Under The New Kentucky Penal Code, Gregory M. Bartlett Jan 1973

Authorized Dispositions Of Offenders Under The New Kentucky Penal Code, Gregory M. Bartlett

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Classification Of Offenses And Disposition Of Offenders, Marvin L. Coan Jan 1973

Classification Of Offenses And Disposition Of Offenders, Marvin L. Coan

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Double Jeopardy And The New Kentucky Penal Code, Neil S. Hackworth Jan 1973

Double Jeopardy And The New Kentucky Penal Code, Neil S. Hackworth

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Far Beyond Nuremberg: Steps Toward International Criminal Jurisdiction, Richard I. Miller Jan 1973

Far Beyond Nuremberg: Steps Toward International Criminal Jurisdiction, Richard I. Miller

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


The Second Circuit Review: Ix. Evidence: Introduction, Paul F. Rothstein Jan 1973

The Second Circuit Review: Ix. Evidence: Introduction, Paul F. Rothstein

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

The past year's developments in the law of evidence have been characterized by a hardening attitude toward criminal defendants. The United States Supreme Court's evidentiary rulings during the term covered by the Second Circuit Review (1971-72) manifested this trend (although not uniformly). For example, police stop-and-frisk authority was broadened (and with it the use of evidence obtained therefrom); the scope of the immunity from criminal prosecution required to be granted by a governmental body before self-incriminatory statements can be compelled from a witness was narrowed; the right to have counsel at line-ups was limited to postindictment or post-charge line-ups (with …


Comment, Presumptions And Due Process: Congress Attacks Organized Crime, Robert Power Dec 1972

Comment, Presumptions And Due Process: Congress Attacks Organized Crime, Robert Power

Robert C Power

No abstract provided.