Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Kentucky (51)
- University of Michigan Law School (13)
- Brigham Young University Law School (9)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (3)
-
- University of Richmond (3)
- Florida International University College of Law (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Federal courts (5)
- United States Supreme Court (5)
- Assembly Committee on Judiciary (3)
- England (3)
- History (3)
-
- Judicial review (3)
- Authority (2)
- Bureaucracy (2)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Comity (2)
- Courts (2)
- Federal Courts (2)
- House of Lords (2)
- Juries (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Justice (2)
- Kentucky (2)
- Lawyers (2)
- Legal analysis (2)
- Legal institutions (2)
- Legal method (2)
- Trials (2)
- 28 U.S.C. 1341 (1)
- ABA (1)
- Aichner v. Aichner (1)
- Alls v. Alls (1)
- Appealability (1)
- Appellate Courts (1)
- Appellate courts (1)
- Appellate justice (1)
- Publication
-
- 1980-1989 (50)
- BYU Law Review (9)
- Michigan Law Review (7)
- Supreme Court Case Files (5)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (4)
-
- California Assembly (3)
- Articles (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Florida State University Law Review (2)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Book Reviews (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- News Articles (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Tennessee Law Review (1)
- UIC Law Review (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 91 - 109 of 109
Full-Text Articles in Law
Snepp V. United States: The Cia Secrecy Agreement And The First Amendment, Diane Orentlicher
Snepp V. United States: The Cia Secrecy Agreement And The First Amendment, Diane Orentlicher
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Review Of The Court Years, 1939-1975, David S. Cohen
Review Of The Court Years, 1939-1975, David S. Cohen
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Failing Companies And The Antitrust Laws, Janet L. Mcdavid
Failing Companies And The Antitrust Laws, Janet L. Mcdavid
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This article will examine two areas in which the courts have given financially-troubled companies special treatment under the antitrust laws. Part I discusses the acquisition of a failing company, which may constitute a judicially-created exemption from section 7 of the Clayton Act. Part II considers certain cases involving failing companies whose conduct is challenged under section 1 of the Sherman Act.
Filing For Personal Bankruptcy: Adoption Of A "Bona Fide Effort" Test Under Chapter 13, Stephan M. Vidmar
Filing For Personal Bankruptcy: Adoption Of A "Bona Fide Effort" Test Under Chapter 13, Stephan M. Vidmar
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Part I discusses the history and current application of the Chapter 13 wage earner relief provisions, focusing on the present "good faith" controversy. Part II analyzes the "bona fide effort" test and examines its current congressional status. Part III suggests that more specific statutory guidance is necessary in order to effectively apply the "bona fide effort" test and recommends specific guidelines for its use. The article concludes that by following such a set of standard guidelines when applying the "bona fide effort" test, bankruptcy courts would promote uniform treatment of debtors, enhance judicial economy, and facilitate appellate review of Chapter …
Congressional Regulation Of Federal Courts' Jurisdiction And Processes: United States V. Klein Revisited, Gordon G. Young
Congressional Regulation Of Federal Courts' Jurisdiction And Processes: United States V. Klein Revisited, Gordon G. Young
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
An Evaluation Of Limited Publication In The United States Courts Of Appeals: The Price Of Reform, William L. Reynolds, William M. Richman
An Evaluation Of Limited Publication In The United States Courts Of Appeals: The Price Of Reform, William L. Reynolds, William M. Richman
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Discovery Of Penalites, William Hamilton Bryson
Discovery Of Penalites, William Hamilton Bryson
Law Faculty Publications
The purpose of this essay is to discuss some aspects of the scope of the privilege against self-incrimination. It will consider first what can not be and then what can be discovered by the common law of England before 1776, when the first republican constitution of Virginia was promulgated. Finally, the developments in Virginia and federal practice will be dealt with.
Case Digest, Journal Staff
Case Digest, Journal Staff
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Case Digest--
Spouse of Injured Seaman May Recover Damages for Loss of Society under Maritime Common Law
Federal District Court Lacks Jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1350 over Fraud Action Brought by Alien when Claim Fails to Implicate a Treaty or Body of Rules Governing Relations between Foreign States
Jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Requires at Least a Finding of International Shoe "Minimum Contacts"
Appellate Court will not Review the Post-Settlement Appeal of a Pre-Settlement Provisional Remedy without District Court Consideration of the Intervening Events
Foreign States are Subject to Liability for Non-Commercial Torts arising from the Commercial …
Jury Trial, Progress, And Democracy, 14 J. Marshall L. Rev. 679 (1981), Richard S. Kuhlman, George C. Pontikes, William J. Stevens
Jury Trial, Progress, And Democracy, 14 J. Marshall L. Rev. 679 (1981), Richard S. Kuhlman, George C. Pontikes, William J. Stevens
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Overview Of Virginia Supreme Court Cases On Domestic Relations: 1970-1980, Peter N. Pross
Overview Of Virginia Supreme Court Cases On Domestic Relations: 1970-1980, Peter N. Pross
University of Richmond Law Review
The Supreme Court of Virginia examined a variety of domestic relations problems and issues during the last decade. Most of the court's decisions involved divorce issues such as jurisdiction, alimony or support and maintenance, and child custody or support orders. However, the court also decided cases on annulment, the enforcement of support and maintenance decrees, legitimacy and paternity, adoption, name changes and intrafamily tort immunity.
The Virginia Judicial Council's Intermediate Appellate Court Proposal, Martha B. Brissette
The Virginia Judicial Council's Intermediate Appellate Court Proposal, Martha B. Brissette
University of Richmond Law Review
The ever-expanding volume of appellate litigation in Virginia has engendered a crisis in appellate justice in this state which can be adequately addressed only by the creation of an intermediate appellate court. Not only is Virginia the most populous state without such an intermediate court, its highest court also has the largest caseload of any single state appellate court.
Precedent Times Three: Stare Decisis In The Divided Fifth Circuit, Thomas E. Baker
Precedent Times Three: Stare Decisis In The Divided Fifth Circuit, Thomas E. Baker
Faculty Publications
October 1, 1981, marked a milestone in the history of our federal courts. On that day the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Reorganization Act of 1980 (Reorganization Act) divided the" former fifth circuit" into the" new fifth circuit," composed of the District of the Canal Zone, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, and the new" eleventh circuit," composed of Alabama, Florida, and Georgia.
Griffin V. California: Still Viable After All These Years, Craig M. Bradley
Griffin V. California: Still Viable After All These Years, Craig M. Bradley
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Voir Dire In Kentucky: An Empirical Study Of Voir Dire In Kentucky Circuit Courts, William H. Fortune
Voir Dire In Kentucky: An Empirical Study Of Voir Dire In Kentucky Circuit Courts, William H. Fortune
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Voir dire is the stage of a jury trial at which prospective jurors are questioned under oath by court or counsel to determine their suitability as jurors in the case to be tried. Kentucky's high court has repeatedly recognized the importance of voir dire to the exercise of for-cause and peremptory challenges.
The trial judge's wide discretion in voir dire, however, necessarily makes a review of appellate decisions of minimal assistance in ascertaining what actually occurs during this important phase of a jury trial. Published opinions provide little guidance in this area; information about voir dire must come from a …
The Distrust Of Politics, Terrance Sandalow
The Distrust Of Politics, Terrance Sandalow
Articles
In this Article, Dean Sandalow considers the justifications advanced by those who favor the removal of certain political issues from the political process by extending the reach of judicial review. He begins by examining the distrust of politics in a different context, discussing the proposals made by the Progressives for reforming municipal government, as a vehicle to expose the assumptions underlying the current debate. His comparison of the two historical settings reveals many similarities between the Progressives' reform proposals and the contemporary justiflcations.[or the displacement of politics with constitutional law. Dean Sandalow concludes that the distrust of politics rests not …
The Role Of Comity In The Law Of Federal Courts, Michael L. Wells
The Role Of Comity In The Law Of Federal Courts, Michael L. Wells
Scholarly Works
Considerations of comity often require federal courts to defer to state courts when federal issues could be raised in state proceedings. Contexts in which such deference is required include Younger abstention, habeus corpus exhaustion and procedural default, and Pullman and Burford abstention. In this Article, Professor Wells demonstrates that the Supreme Court's opinions fail to make a distinction between cases where comity requires restraint and those where it does not. The Court's motive in invoking comity is not to decrease access to federal courts, but instead to strike a compromise between the individual's interest in a federal forum and the …
Parallel State And Federal Court Class Actions, Kevin T. Keating
Parallel State And Federal Court Class Actions, Kevin T. Keating
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Cleveland Housing Court Act: New Answer To An Old Problem, Frederic P. White
The Cleveland Housing Court Act: New Answer To An Old Problem, Frederic P. White
Cleveland State Law Review
This Article will critically examine the Housing Court's historical setting, constitutional foundation and jurisdictional powers. In addition, comparison with systems established in other states provides possible alternative suggestions for successful operation. Finally, an in-depth analysis of current problems, including inadequate funds and staff, political manipulation and protracted procedural delays, seeks to answer the question of whether the Housing Court will become a meaningful and positive force for change, or simply an "indecisive, inefficient and interminable" bureaucratic nightmare.