Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Roger Williams University (14)
- Singapore Management University (12)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (12)
- Columbia Law School (10)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (6)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- William & Mary Law School (6)
- Duke Law (5)
- Georgetown University Law Center (5)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- University of Richmond (5)
- Fordham Law School (4)
- Pace University (4)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (4)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Florida International University College of Law (2)
- Montclair State University (2)
- Technological University Dublin (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (2)
- University of Connecticut (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (20)
- Pandemic (14)
- Supreme Court (13)
- COVID-19 (11)
- Court (9)
-
- Criminal (9)
- Judge (9)
- Public health (9)
- "Rhode Island" (8)
- Federal courts (8)
- Justice (8)
- Law (8)
- Federal Courts (7)
- Judicial (7)
- Singapore (7)
- Bowman (6)
- Constitution (6)
- Judges (6)
- Lawyers (6)
- Legal (6)
- Public (6)
- Chief (5)
- Coronavirus (5)
- District (5)
- First (5)
- Students (5)
- Supreme (5)
- United States Supreme Court (5)
- American (4)
- Board (4)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (22)
- All Faculty Scholarship (13)
- Articles (13)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (12)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (11)
-
- Scholarly Articles (8)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (5)
- Law Faculty Publications (5)
- All Faculty Publications (4)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (4)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Popular Media (3)
- Publications (3)
- Center on Children, Families, and the Law: Faculty Publications (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- College of Law - Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Honors Scholar Theses (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
Articles 151 - 154 of 154
Full-Text Articles in Law
Comments To Hud Re: Fr-6111-P-02, Hud’S Implementation Of The Fair Housing Act’S Disparate Impact Standard, Lauren E. Willis, Olatunde C.A. Johnson, Mark Niles, Rigel Christine Oliveri
Comments To Hud Re: Fr-6111-P-02, Hud’S Implementation Of The Fair Housing Act’S Disparate Impact Standard, Lauren E. Willis, Olatunde C.A. Johnson, Mark Niles, Rigel Christine Oliveri
Faculty Scholarship
In key places, HUD’s 2019 proposed "Implementation of the Fair Housing Act’s Disparate Impact Standard" is at odds with express provisions of the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and goes so far as to invent new defenses to liability for housing discrimination and to place the burden of pleading and proving the nonexistence of some of these defenses on plaintiffs. In addition, the proposed rule addresses itself to matters beyond the FHA; specifically, to evidentiary and procedural issues as they may arise in cases brought under the FHA in federal or state courts. HUD provides no reasoned justification for these changes …
"Downright Indifference": Examining Unpublished Decisions In The Federal Courts Of Appeals, Merritt E. Mcalister
"Downright Indifference": Examining Unpublished Decisions In The Federal Courts Of Appeals, Merritt E. Mcalister
UF Law Faculty Publications
Nearly 90 percent of the work of the federal courts of appeals looks nothing like the opinions law students read in casebooks. Over the last fifty years, the so-called “unpublished decision” has overtaken the federal appellate courts in response to a caseload volume “crisis.” These are often short, perfunctory decisions that make no law; they are, one federal judge said, “not safe for human consumption.” The creation of the inferior unpublished decision also has created an inferior track of appellate justice for a class of appellants: indigent litigants. The federal appellate courts routinely shunt indigent appeals to a second-tier appellate …
Mass Digitization Of Chinese Court Decisions: How To Use Text As Data In The Field Of Chinese Law, Benjamin L. Liebman, Margaret Roberts, Rachel E. Stern, Alice Z. Wang
Mass Digitization Of Chinese Court Decisions: How To Use Text As Data In The Field Of Chinese Law, Benjamin L. Liebman, Margaret Roberts, Rachel E. Stern, Alice Z. Wang
Faculty Scholarship
Since 2014, Chinese courts have placed tens of millions of court judgments online. We analyze the promise and pitfalls of using this new data source, highlighting takeaways for readers facing similar issues using other collections of legal texts. Drawing on 1,058,986 documents from Henan Province, we identify problems with missing data and call on scholars to treat variation in court disclosure rates as an urgent research question. We also outline strategies for learning from a corpus that is vast and incomplete. Using a topic model of administrative litigation in Henan, we complicate conventional wisdom that administrative lawsuits are an extension …
Pushing The Envelope: Salzberg V. Sciabacucchi And Delaware's Evolving View Of The Internal Affairs Doctrine, Mark J. Loewenstein
Pushing The Envelope: Salzberg V. Sciabacucchi And Delaware's Evolving View Of The Internal Affairs Doctrine, Mark J. Loewenstein
Publications
In January, 2020, the Delaware Supreme Court handed down its decision in Salzberg v. Sciabacucchi, upholding a provision in a certificate of incorporation that designated the federal courts as the exclusive jurisdiction for the litigation of claims under the federal Securities Act of 1933. The inclusion of these provisions in Delaware charters and bylaws – often referred to as “Federal Forum Provisions” or FFPs – raised important questions as to the reach of the internal affairs doctrine. This doctrine provides that the jurisdiction of incorporation regulates the internal affairs of its corporations: the relationship among and between the corporate …