Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (27)
- Roger Williams University (15)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- University of Richmond (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
-
- BLR (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (27)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (12)
- Pepperdine Law Review (4)
- Law Library Newsletters/Blog (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
-
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- ExpressO (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Georgia Law Review (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Legislation and Policy Brief (1)
- Marquette Law Review (1)
- Pro Bono Collaborative Staff Publications (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 58 of 58
Full-Text Articles in Law
Cambodia At A Crossroads: How Repealing Untac Article 63, Cambodia's Current Defamation Law, Will Lead To A More Vigorous Democracy, Alicia A. Adornato
Cambodia At A Crossroads: How Repealing Untac Article 63, Cambodia's Current Defamation Law, Will Lead To A More Vigorous Democracy, Alicia A. Adornato
ExpressO
Cambodia’s current criminal defamation law is an impermissible intrusion of Cambodians’ constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of expression. The law itself is a remnant of the United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia. Moreover it is now being used as a tool to silence the government’s political opposition through a weak judiciary system, leaving in its wake a democracy afraid to exercise its constitutionally guaranteed rights. This law is an unconstitutional violation for several reasons: first, it violates the right to freedom of expression which is guaranteed in Cambodia’s Constitution. Secondly, it is incompatible with Cambodia’s human rights obligations under the …
Rule 704: Opinion On Ultimate Issue
New York's Son Of Sam Law: Alive And Well Today, Steven P. Vargas
New York's Son Of Sam Law: Alive And Well Today, Steven P. Vargas
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Brief Look At New York's Efforts To Codify Its Law Of Evidence, Barbara C. Salken
A Brief Look At New York's Efforts To Codify Its Law Of Evidence, Barbara C. Salken
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Obstacles To The Creation Of A Permanent War Crimes Tribunal, Christopher L. Blakesley
Obstacles To The Creation Of A Permanent War Crimes Tribunal, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
Individual liability for war crimes is difficult to enforce and is unlikely to be accepted uniformly by states.
Individual criminal responsibility is the cornerstone of any international war crimes tribunal. Nuremberg Principle I provides that “[a]ny person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment.” Acts by heads of state or other government officials, even if committed in an official capacity, may not constitute an immunity defense to or mitigate criminality. These officials, therefore, could also be held responsible for offenses committed pursuant to their orders. Additionally, liability for criminal …
Apostle Of Fundamental Fairness: New York Court Of Appeals Judge Stewart F. Hancock, Jr.'S State Constitutional Decision-Making, Thompson Gould Page
Apostle Of Fundamental Fairness: New York Court Of Appeals Judge Stewart F. Hancock, Jr.'S State Constitutional Decision-Making, Thompson Gould Page
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Evolution Of The Lower Court Of Nova Scotia, Sandra E. Oxner
The Evolution Of The Lower Court Of Nova Scotia, Sandra E. Oxner
Dalhousie Law Journal
The evolution of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia has been well described elsewhere.' This paper will describe the evolution during the colonial period of the main civil and criminal lower courts of Nova Scotia. Omitted are such courts as the Vice Admiralty and Probate Courts. These require separate examination. This paper traces the development of the courts of General Sessions of the Peace and the Inferior Court of Common Pleas, the main criminal and civil lower courts of the period, from the time of their inception shortly after the founding of Halifax in 1749. The examination of these courts …