Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Note And Comment, Ralph W. Aigler, Edgar N. Durfee, Werner W. Schroeder, Arthur A. Morrow, Harry B. Sutter, Russell H. Neilson
Note And Comment, Ralph W. Aigler, Edgar N. Durfee, Werner W. Schroeder, Arthur A. Morrow, Harry B. Sutter, Russell H. Neilson
Michigan Law Review
Estates in Fee Tail - Quite generally estates in fee tail under the STATUTE DE DONIS were recognized by the states as a part of the common law. Statutory provisions in the way of modification and abolishment of such estates, however, are very common. The nature and scope of the statutory provisions have varied. See the states classified according to the character of the legislation in BREWSTER, CONVEYANCING, § § 142, 143.
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
Recent Important Decisions; Book Reviews, Edwin C. Goddard, John R. Rood
Recent Important Decisions; Book Reviews, Edwin C. Goddard, John R. Rood
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions and book reviews.
Note And Comment, John B. Waite, Thomas H. Westlake, William C. Mullendore, Harry B. Sutter
Note And Comment, John B. Waite, Thomas H. Westlake, William C. Mullendore, Harry B. Sutter
Michigan Law Review
Dean Pound Harvard has honored itself in the appointment of Roscoe POUND to the deanship of its law school
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
Note And Comment, John B. Waite, Werner W. Schroeder, Russell H. Neilson, Harry L. Bell, Walter F. Whitman, C E. Eldridge
Note And Comment, John B. Waite, Werner W. Schroeder, Russell H. Neilson, Harry L. Bell, Walter F. Whitman, C E. Eldridge
Michigan Law Review
Recovery of the Purchase Price Before Title Has Passed - In an action recently instituted' by The General Electric Co. to recover on a contract to manufacture certain machinery for the defendant, which machinery the defendant had refused to accept, the trial court adopted the contract price as the measure of damages. The upper court approved this measure of damages, rejecting the argument that the measure should have been the difference between the market value and the contract price, and dismissed, as no longer appropriate to modern conditions, the decisions in Bement v. Smith, 15 Wend. (N. Y.) 493, and …
Note And Comment, John R. Rood, Henry M. Bates, Werner W. Schroeder, Robert E. Richardson, Hollace M. Reid
Note And Comment, John R. Rood, Henry M. Bates, Werner W. Schroeder, Robert E. Richardson, Hollace M. Reid
Michigan Law Review
Can a Manufacturer be Compelled to Sell? - The fight for price maintenance is not yet completely settled, despite, the decisions in Dr. Miles Medical Company v. Parks & Sois Company, and Baiter & Cie v. O'Donnell, which held invalid contracts, whether nominally of agency, or of sale, between manufacturer and wholesaler or jobber whereby the latter in purchasing agreed himself to maintain and to sell only to others who would maintain a schedule of prices established by the manufacturer. But there are more ways than one of maintaining prices. One of these is to refuse to sell to persons …