Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (158)
- William & Mary Law School (51)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (27)
- United Arab Emirates University (25)
- Brooklyn Law School (21)
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (19)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (19)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (18)
- Seattle University School of Law (17)
- Notre Dame Law School (16)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (16)
- The University of Akron (15)
- UC Law SF (15)
- University of Kentucky (14)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (14)
- Florida International University College of Law (13)
- Fordham Law School (13)
- University of Washington School of Law (13)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (11)
- Pepperdine University (11)
- St. Mary's University (11)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (9)
- University of Georgia School of Law (8)
- St. John's University School of Law (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (7)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (7)
- Brigham Young University Law School (6)
- Cornell University Law School (6)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (37)
- Constitutional law (36)
- Constitution (32)
- Supreme Court (29)
- First Amendment (27)
-
- Congress (12)
- Free speech (12)
- Second Amendment (12)
- Privacy (11)
- Abortion (10)
- Federalism (10)
- Qualified Immunity (10)
- Bivens (8)
- COVID-19 (8)
- Civil rights (8)
- Damages (8)
- Donald Trump (8)
- Due process (8)
- Federal Officers (8)
- Racial classifications (8)
- Separation of powers (8)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (8)
- Constitutional rights (7)
- Criminal Law (7)
- Eighth Amendment (7)
- Fifth Amendment (7)
- First Amendment; Freedom of Speech; Free speech; Constitutional Law; John Roberts; Roberts Court; Free Expression; Freedom of Expression; First Freedom; Supreme Court jurisprudence; Constitution; Constitutional Principles (7)
- Fourteenth Amendment (7)
- Guns (7)
- Human Rights (7)
- Publication
-
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (120)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (34)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (30)
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law (27)
- UAEU Law Journal (25)
-
- Touro Law Review (18)
- Arkansas Law Review (17)
- Seattle University Law Review (16)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (16)
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (15)
- Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law (14)
- Northwestern University Law Review (14)
- Notre Dame Law Review (14)
- FIU Law Review (13)
- Brooklyn Law Review (12)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (11)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (11)
- Washington Law Review (11)
- Pepperdine Law Review (10)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (10)
- ConLawNOW (9)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (9)
- William & Mary Law Review (9)
- Catholic University Law Review (8)
- Michigan Law Review (8)
- Villanova Law Review (8)
- Maryland Law Review (7)
- Akron Law Review (6)
- BYU Law Review (6)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (6)
Articles 691 - 697 of 697
Full-Text Articles in Law
Working Mothers And The Postponement Of Women's Rights From The Nineteenth Amendment To The Equal Rights Amendment, Julie C. Suk
Working Mothers And The Postponement Of Women's Rights From The Nineteenth Amendment To The Equal Rights Amendment, Julie C. Suk
University of Colorado Law Review
The Nineteenth Amendment's ratification in 1920 spawned new initiatives to advance the status of women, including the proposal of another constitutional amendment that would guarantee women equality in all legal rights, beyond the right to vote. Both the Nineteenth Amendment and the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) grew out of the long quest to enshrine women's equal status under the law as citizens, which began in the nineteenth century. Nearly a century later, the ERA remains unfinished business with an uncertain future. Suffragists advanced different visions and strategies for women's empowerment after they got the constitutional right to vote. They divided …
"Make The Map All White": The Meaning Of Maps In The Prohibition And Suffrage Campaigns, Susan Schulten
"Make The Map All White": The Meaning Of Maps In The Prohibition And Suffrage Campaigns, Susan Schulten
University of Colorado Law Review
Maps.have long been deployed as instruments of power, protest, and reform in American history. In the antebellum era, Northerners used maps to galvanize opposition to the expansion of slavery beyond the South. These dramatic and urgent anti-slavery maps served as powerful models for two of the most ambitious challenges to American law in the twentieth century: prohibition and woman's suffrage. Both movements began with regional strengths-suffrage in the West, prohibition in the South. Suffragists and prohibitionists widely circulated maps to highlight those legislative achievements and thereby generate further momentum for their respective causes. After 1913, both the suffrage and prohibition …
Swearing In The Phoenix: Toward A More Sensible System For Seating Members Of The House Of Representatives At Organization, Brian C. Kalt
Swearing In The Phoenix: Toward A More Sensible System For Seating Members Of The House Of Representatives At Organization, Brian C. Kalt
Marquette Law Review
Under U.S. House precedent, any member-elect can challenge the right of
any other member-elect to take the oath of office at the beginning of a new term.
The uncontested members-elect then swear in and decide the fate of those who
were forced to stand aside. If the House is closely divided and there are
disputed elections at the margins, a minority party could exploit this procedure
to try to seize control of the House.
The People's Court: On The Intellectual Origins Of American Judicial Power, Ian C. Bartrum
The People's Court: On The Intellectual Origins Of American Judicial Power, Ian C. Bartrum
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
This article enters into the modern debate between “consti- tutional departmentalists”—who contend that the executive and legislative branches share constitutional interpretive authority with the courts—and what are sometimes called “judicial supremacists.” After exploring the relevant history of political ideas, I join the modern minority of voices in the latter camp.
This is an intellectual history of two evolving political ideas—popular sovereignty and the separation of powers—which merged in the making of American judicial power, and I argue we can only understand the structural function of judicial review by bringing these ideas together into an integrated whole. Or, put another way, …
The Carbon Price Equivalent: A Metric For Comparing Climate Change Mitigation Efforts Across Jurisdictions, Gabriel Weil
The Carbon Price Equivalent: A Metric For Comparing Climate Change Mitigation Efforts Across Jurisdictions, Gabriel Weil
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Climate change presents a global commons problem: Emissions reductions on the scale needed to meet global targets do not pass a domestic cost-benefit test in most countries. To give national governments ample incentive to pursue deep decarbonization, mutual interstate coercion will be necessary. Many proposed tools of coercive climate diplomacy would require a onedimensional metric for comparing the stringency of climate change mitigation policy packages across jurisdictions. This article proposes and defends such a metric: the carbon price equivalent. There is substantial variation in the set of climate change mitigation policy instruments implemented by different countries. Nonetheless, the consequences of …
Don't Change The Subject: How State Election Laws Can Nullify Ballot Questions, Cole Gordner
Don't Change The Subject: How State Election Laws Can Nullify Ballot Questions, Cole Gordner
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Procedural election laws regulate the conduct of state elections and provide for greater transparency and fairness in statewide ballots. These laws ensure that the public votes separately on incongruous bills and protects the electorate from uncertainties contained in omnibus packages. As demonstrated by a slew of recent court cases, however, interest groups that are opposed to the objective of a ballot question are utilizing these election laws with greater frequency either to prevent a state electorate from voting on an initiative or to overturn a ballot question that was already decided in the initiative’s favor. This practice is subverting the …
Some Objections To Strict Liability For Constitutional Torts, Michael L. Wells
Some Objections To Strict Liability For Constitutional Torts, Michael L. Wells
Georgia Law Review
Qualified immunity protects officials from damages for
constitutional violations unless they have violated “clearly
established” rights. Local governments enjoy no immunity, but
they may not be sued on a vicarious liability theory for
constitutional violations committed by their employees. Critics
of the current regime would overturn these rules in order to
vindicate constitutional rights and deter violations. This
Article argues that across-the-board abolition of these limits on
liability would be unwise as the costs would outweigh the
benefits. In some contexts, however, exceptions may be justified.
Much of the recent controversy surrounding qualified
immunity involves suits in which police officers …