Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (3474)
- SelectedWorks (1175)
- Latin American and Caribbean Law and Economics Association (23)
- Liberty University (20)
- Widener Law (15)
-
- The University of Akron (13)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (13)
- Duquesne University School of Law (10)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (10)
- Florida Coastal School of Law (9)
- Cleveland State University (7)
- Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law (5)
- Widener University Delaware Law School (4)
- University of South Dakota (3)
- Arizona Summit Law School (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Lincoln Memorial University - Duncan School of Law (2)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- California Western School of Law (1)
- DePaul University (1)
- Nova Southeastern University (1)
- Oklahoma City University School of Law (1)
- School of Education and Human Development at the University of Colorado Denver (1)
- The University of San Francisco (1)
- USC Gould School of Law (1)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (1264)
- Constitutional law (365)
- Constitutional History (284)
- First Amendment (225)
- Constitution (185)
-
- Law and Society (185)
- Supreme Court (164)
- Jurisprudence (158)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (151)
- Legal History (144)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (138)
- Courts (117)
- Civil Rights (114)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (110)
- Politics (108)
- Religion (106)
- Fourteenth Amendment (102)
- Federalism (91)
- Human Rights Law (80)
- Legislation (80)
- Judges (75)
- International Law (74)
- Criminal Law (71)
- Constitutional Law, Generally (69)
- Law and Economics (68)
- Selected Professional Activities (67)
- Due process (62)
- Equal protection (62)
- First amendment (59)
- Free speech (57)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Peter J. Aschenbrenner (274)
- Charles H. Baron (137)
- Paulo Ferreira da Cunha (116)
- Alan E Garfield (94)
- Kent Greenfield (90)
-
- Neal E. Devins (75)
- Erwin Chemerinsky (53)
- Michael C. Dorf (51)
- Adam Lamparello (50)
- Michael A. Scaperlanda (46)
- Robert M. Bloom (40)
- Mark Graber (38)
- Martin A. Schwartz (38)
- Horacio M. LYNCH (36)
- David B Kopel (34)
- Robert Bloom (34)
- Shubhankar Dam (34)
- Beau James Brock (33)
- Michael A Helfand (33)
- Nicos Trimikliniotis (33)
- Richard Adelstein (29)
- Hou Meng (28)
- Robert G. Natelson (27)
- Sergio Verdugo R. (27)
- Rod Smolla (26)
- Stephen M. Feldman (26)
- Daniel Soria Luján (25)
- Lawrence Rosenthal (25)
- Stephen E Henderson (24)
- C. Peter Erlinder (22)
Articles 271 - 300 of 4800
Full-Text Articles in Law
Who Should Make Choices On Abortion?, Alan E. Garfield
Who Should Make Choices On Abortion?, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
Embracing Race-Conscious College Admissions Programs: How Fisher V. University Of Texas At Austin Redefines "Affirmative Action" As A Holistic Approach To Admissions That Ensures Equal, Not Preferential, Treatment, Nancy L. Zisk
Nancy L. Zisk
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-established Supreme Court doctrine that race may be considered when a college or university decides whom to admit and whom to reject, as long as the consideration of race is part of a narrowly tailored holistic consideration of an applicant's many distinguishing features. The Court's latest decision heralds a new way of thinking about holistic race-conscious admissions programs. Rather than considering them as "affirmative action" plans that prefer any one applicant to the disadvantage of another, they should be viewed as the Court has described …
What's A Judge To Do? Remedying The Remedy In Institutional Reform Litigation, Susan Poser
What's A Judge To Do? Remedying The Remedy In Institutional Reform Litigation, Susan Poser
Susan Poser
Democracy by Decree is the latest contribution to a scholarly literature, now nearly thirty-years old, which questions whether judges have the legitimacy and the capacity to oversee the remedial phase of institutional reform litigation. Previous contributors to this literature have come out on one side or the other of the legitimacy and capacity debate. Abram Chayes, Owen Fiss, and more recently, Malcolm Feeley and Edward Rubin, have all argued that the proper role of judges is to remedy rights violations and that judges possess the legitimate institutional authority to order structural injunctions. Lon Fuller, Donald Horowitz, William Fletcher, and Gerald …
Lopez And The Federalization Of Criminal Law, Russell L. Weaver
Lopez And The Federalization Of Criminal Law, Russell L. Weaver
Russell L. Weaver
No abstract provided.
Fisher’S Forewarning: Using Data To Normalize College Admissions, Shakira D. Pleasant
Fisher’S Forewarning: Using Data To Normalize College Admissions, Shakira D. Pleasant
Shakira D. Pleasant
This Article presents a nuanced view of Fisher v. University of Texas that has largely been ignored in mainstream discourse in the case. In Fisher, Justice Anthony Kennedy cast the deciding vote to uphold the University of Texas (“UT”) race-conscious admissions policy. This was the first time that Justice Kennedy voted to uphold a race-conscious policy, and many commentators have focused on this aspect of his Fisher majority opinion. However, Justice Kennedy also gave a stern forewarning to UT and other universities: in the future, they better have strong data to show that they need to use race-conscious admissions. …
Active Judicial Governance, James A. Gardner
Active Judicial Governance, James A. Gardner
James Gardner
Evidence marshaled in a new article by Jonathan Marshfield suggests strongly that unlike judges of U.S. federal courts, judges of American state supreme courts both recognize and embrace their role as active participants in the process of indirect popular self-rule. Consequently, they much more willingly serve as active and self-conscious vectors of governance. This is not to say that state judges lack appropriate judicial humility; it is to say merely that they possess a different and more nuanced understanding of the role of courts in American government than some of their federal counterparts.
The Emerging Use Of A Balancing Approach In Casey'S Undue Burden Analysis, Karen A. Jordan
The Emerging Use Of A Balancing Approach In Casey'S Undue Burden Analysis, Karen A. Jordan
Karen A. Jordan
No abstract provided.
Hush Don't Say A Word: Safeguarding Student's Freedom Of Expression In The Trump Era, Laura R. Mcneal
Hush Don't Say A Word: Safeguarding Student's Freedom Of Expression In The Trump Era, Laura R. Mcneal
Laura R. McNeal
The controversy surrounding NFL player Colin Kaepernick’s act of kneeling during the national anthem in protest of police brutality against people of color continues to permeate public discourse. In March 2017, President Trump referenced Colin Kaepernick’s symbolic act during a rally in Louisville, Kentucky, in an effort to illustrate his strong opposition to anyone kneeling during the national anthem. In this speech, President Trump stated that although many NFL franchise owners were interested in signing Colin Kaepernick, many were afraid of receiving a nasty tweet from him. Likewise, in another speech, President Trump stated, “I think it’s a great lack …
Racial Indirection, Yuvraj Joshi
Racial Indirection, Yuvraj Joshi
Yuvraj Joshi
The "Guarantee" Clause, Ryan C. Williams
The "Guarantee" Clause, Ryan C. Williams
Ryan Williams
Article IV’s command that “the United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government” stands as one of the few remaining lacunae in the judicially enforced Constitution. For well over a century, federal courts have viewed the provision — traditionally known as the Guarantee Clause but now referred to by some as the “Republican Form of Government” Clause — as a paradigmatic example of a nonjusticiable political question. In recent years, however, both the Supreme Court and lower federal courts have signaled a new willingness to reconsider this much-criticized jurisdictional barrier in an appropriate …
Forensic Constitutional Interpretation, Brian F. Havel
Forensic Constitutional Interpretation, Brian F. Havel
Brian Havel
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Association And Ngo Law: The Constitutionality Of The 2009 Zambian Ngo Law, Muna Ndulo
Freedom Of Association And Ngo Law: The Constitutionality Of The 2009 Zambian Ngo Law, Muna Ndulo
Muna B Ndulo
Freedom of Association is entrenched in the Zambian Constitution and in several International Law instruments to which Zambia is a party. By hindering the independent and effective operations of NGOs, the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) Act of 2009 unjustifiably curtails this freedom. This paper examines the NGO Act and documents the various instances in which it imposes an unconstitutional, unjustifiable and disproportionate hindrance on the ability of NGOs to operate effectively. It argues that the Act threatens to roll back the enormous gains that NGOs have made and continue to make in fermenting accountable, democratic and effective governance in Zambia.
Law Association Of Zambia V. The Attorney General (Appeal No. 8/2014) [2016] Zmsc 243, Muna B. Ndulo, Samuel Ndungu
Law Association Of Zambia V. The Attorney General (Appeal No. 8/2014) [2016] Zmsc 243, Muna B. Ndulo, Samuel Ndungu
Muna B Ndulo
No abstract provided.
Attorney General V Mutuna And Others (Appeal No. 088/2012) [2013] Zmsc 38, Muna B. Ndulo
Attorney General V Mutuna And Others (Appeal No. 088/2012) [2013] Zmsc 38, Muna B. Ndulo
Muna B Ndulo
No abstract provided.
Hichilema And Another V Lungu And Another (2016/Cc/0031) [2016] Zmcc 4 (5 September 2016), Majority Judgment, Muna Ndulo
Hichilema And Another V Lungu And Another (2016/Cc/0031) [2016] Zmcc 4 (5 September 2016), Majority Judgment, Muna Ndulo
Muna B Ndulo
No abstract provided.
Constitution Making: The Role Of External Actors, Muna B. Ndulo
Constitution Making: The Role Of External Actors, Muna B. Ndulo
Muna B Ndulo
In the past three decades new constitutions have been developed in many parts of the world, often in the aftermath of conflicts, but also in response to demands for more democratic political systems or for the resolution of institutional crises. In these processes, the international community often plays an important role. This article considers the role that external actors play in the elaboration and development of new constitutions in post-conflict societies. It identifies both the negative and the positive roles external intervention can play and suggests approaches that could be adopted by external actors to maximize their impact while avoiding …
Habeas Corpus In The Age Of Guantánamo, Cary Federman
Habeas Corpus In The Age Of Guantánamo, Cary Federman
Cary Federman
The purpose of the article is to examine the meaning of habeas corpus in the age of the war on terror and the detention camps at Guantanamo Bay. Since the war on terror was declared in 2001, the writ has been invoked from quarters not normally considered within the federal courts’ domain. In this article, I set out to do two things: first, I provide an overview of the writ’s history in the United States and explain its connection to federalism and unlawful executive detention. I then set out to bridge the two meanings of habeas corpus. Second, then, I …
Brief For Professor Kent Greenfield As Amicus Curiae In Support Of Respondents, State Of Washington Vs. Arlene's Flowers And Ingersoll Vs. Arlene's Flowers, Kent Greenfield
Kent Greenfield
This amicus curiae brief addresses a fundamental state-law premise of Appellants’ constitutional claims that has gone largely unexplored in the prior briefing: whether Arlene’s Flowers, a Washington for-profit corporation, may obtain an exemption from generally applicable laws based on the religious beliefs of a shareholder, Mrs. Stutzman. Citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores and Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Appellants assert that “Arlene’s free-exercise rights are synonymous with Mrs. Stutzman’s.” Those two cases, however, had nothing to do with Washington corporate law and took no stance on the authority of …
The Constitution As Poetry, Samuel J. Levine
The Constitution As Poetry, Samuel J. Levine
Samuel J. Levine
Building upon a body of scholarship that compares constitutional interpretation to biblical and literary interpretation, and relying on an insight from a prominent nineteenth century rabbinic scholar, this Article briefly explores similarities in the interpretation of the Torah—the text of the Five Books of Moses—and the United States Constitution. Specifically, this Article draws upon Rabbi Naftali Zvi Yehudah Berlin’s (“Netziv”) intriguing suggestion that the interpretation of the text of the Torah parallels the interpretation of poetry. According to Netziv, this parallel accounts for the practice of interpreting the Torah expansively in ways that derive substantive legal rules and principles far …
Youth And Punishment At The Roberts Court, Sara Mayeux
Youth And Punishment At The Roberts Court, Sara Mayeux
Sara Mayeux
No abstract provided.
The Authors' Reply To Commentaries On, And Criticisms Of The Militia And The Right To Arms, Or, How The Second Amendment Fell Silent, H. Richard Uviller, William G. Merkel
The Authors' Reply To Commentaries On, And Criticisms Of The Militia And The Right To Arms, Or, How The Second Amendment Fell Silent, H. Richard Uviller, William G. Merkel
William G. Merkel
No abstract provided.
The Paradox Of Christian-Based Political Advocacy: A Reply To Professor Calhoun, Wayne R. Barnes
The Paradox Of Christian-Based Political Advocacy: A Reply To Professor Calhoun, Wayne R. Barnes
Wayne R. Barnes
Professor Calhoun, in his Article around which this symposium is based, has asserted that it is permissible for citizens to publicly argue for laws or public policy solutions based on explicitly religious reasons. Calhoun candidly admits that he has “long grappled” with this question (as have I, though he for longer), and, in probably the biggest understatement in this entire symposium, notes that Professor Kent Greenawalt identified this as “a particularly significant, debatable, and highly complex problem.” Is it ever. I have a position that I will advance in this article, but I wish to acknowledge at the outset that …
Property-As-Society, Timothy M. Mulvaney
Property-As-Society, Timothy M. Mulvaney
Timothy M. Mulvaney
Modern regulatory takings disputes present a key battleground for competing conceptions of property. This Article offers the following account of the three leading theories: a libertarian view sees property as creating a sphere of individual freedom and control (property-as-liberty); a pecuniary view sees property as a tool of economic investment (property-as-investment); and a progressive view sees property as serving a wide range of evolving communal values that include, but are not limited to, those advanced under both the libertarian and pecuniary conceptions (property-as-society). Against this backdrop, the Article offers two contentions. First, on normative grounds, it asserts that the conception …
Something To [Lex Loci] Celebrationis: Federal Marriage Benefits Following United States V. Windsor, Meg Penrose
Something To [Lex Loci] Celebrationis: Federal Marriage Benefits Following United States V. Windsor, Meg Penrose
Meg Penrose
The new question relating to same sex marriage is not "who decides," but who is married. The federal government and many states have historically relied on the place-of-celebration rule, or lex loci celebrationis, to determine who is married. This ensures that married couples do not lose their marital status simply because they travel across state borders or relocate to a new home. Under lex loci celebrationis, if the marriage is legally valid where it was celebrated, then the marriage is legally valid everywhere else.
This article address the most pressing unresolved question of United States v. Windsor: Will the federal …
A Critical Reexamination Of The Takings Jurisprudence, Glynn S. Lunney Jr
A Critical Reexamination Of The Takings Jurisprudence, Glynn S. Lunney Jr
Glynn Lunney
To provide some insight into the nature of these disagreements, and to suggest a possible solution to the compensation issue, this article undertakes a critical reexamination of the takings jurisprudence. It focuses on the two bases which the modem Court has articulated as support for its resolution of the compensation issue: (1) the articulated purpose of using the just compensation requirement "to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens"; and (2) the early case law. Beginning with the Court's first struggles with the compensation issue in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, this article traces …
Takings, Efficiency, And Distributive Justice: A Response To Professor Dagan, Glynn S. Lunney Jr.
Takings, Efficiency, And Distributive Justice: A Response To Professor Dagan, Glynn S. Lunney Jr.
Glynn Lunney
In A Critical Reexamination of the Takings Jurisprudence, I addressed an efficiency problem that arises when the government attempts to change property rights in a manner that burdens a very few for the benefit of the very many. Specifically, in the absence of compensation, the collective action advantage of the few in organizing to oppose the proposed measure will often give them a decided edge against the many. As a result of that advantage, the few will too often be able to persuade the legislature not to act, even when an objective evaluation of the proposal's costs and benefits would …
The U.S. Supreme Court's Failure To Fix Plea Bargaining: The Impact Of Lafler And Frye, Cynthia Alkon
The U.S. Supreme Court's Failure To Fix Plea Bargaining: The Impact Of Lafler And Frye, Cynthia Alkon
Cynthia Alkon
Virtually every criminal conviction in the United States is the result of a guilty plea, not a jury trial. Yet it was not until 2012, in the companion cases of Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye, that the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a defendant's constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining. Legal commentators suggested that these cases were "the single greatest revolution in the criminal justice process since Gideon v. Wainwright." But will things really improve for defendants in the wake of Lafler and Frye? The simple answer is: "No." Lafler and Frye will not bring …
The Future Of The Foreign Commerce Clause, Scott Sullivan
The Future Of The Foreign Commerce Clause, Scott Sullivan
Scott Sullivan
The Foreign Commerce Clause has been lost, subsumed by its interstate cousin, and overshadowed in foreign relations by the treaty power. Consistent with its original purpose and the implied, but unrefined view asserted by the judiciary, this Article articulates a broader and deeper Foreign Commerce power than is popularly understood. It reframes doctrinal considerations for a reinvigorated Foreign Commerce Clause— both as an independent power and in alliance with other coordinate foreign affairs powers—and demonstrates that increasing global complexity and interdependence makes broad and deep federal authority under this power crucial to effective and efficient action in matters of national …
Why The Late Justice Scalia Was Wrong: The Fallacies Of Constitutional Textualism, Ken Levy
Why The Late Justice Scalia Was Wrong: The Fallacies Of Constitutional Textualism, Ken Levy
Ken Levy
No abstract provided.
Is Placing A Cross On Public Property Constitutional?, Alan E. Garfield
Is Placing A Cross On Public Property Constitutional?, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.