Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (158)
- William & Mary Law School (51)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (27)
- United Arab Emirates University (25)
- Brooklyn Law School (21)
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (19)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (19)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (18)
- Seattle University School of Law (17)
- Notre Dame Law School (16)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (16)
- The University of Akron (15)
- UC Law SF (15)
- University of Kentucky (14)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (14)
- Florida International University College of Law (13)
- Fordham Law School (13)
- University of Washington School of Law (13)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (11)
- Pepperdine University (11)
- St. Mary's University (11)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (9)
- University of Georgia School of Law (8)
- St. John's University School of Law (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (7)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (7)
- Brigham Young University Law School (6)
- Cornell University Law School (6)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (37)
- Constitutional law (36)
- Constitution (32)
- Supreme Court (29)
- First Amendment (27)
-
- Congress (12)
- Free speech (12)
- Second Amendment (12)
- Privacy (11)
- Abortion (10)
- Federalism (10)
- Qualified Immunity (10)
- Bivens (8)
- COVID-19 (8)
- Civil rights (8)
- Damages (8)
- Donald Trump (8)
- Due process (8)
- Federal Officers (8)
- Racial classifications (8)
- Separation of powers (8)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (8)
- Constitutional rights (7)
- Criminal Law (7)
- Eighth Amendment (7)
- Fifth Amendment (7)
- First Amendment; Freedom of Speech; Free speech; Constitutional Law; John Roberts; Roberts Court; Free Expression; Freedom of Expression; First Freedom; Supreme Court jurisprudence; Constitution; Constitutional Principles (7)
- Fourteenth Amendment (7)
- Guns (7)
- Human Rights (7)
- Publication
-
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (120)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (34)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (30)
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law (27)
- UAEU Law Journal (25)
-
- Touro Law Review (18)
- Arkansas Law Review (17)
- Seattle University Law Review (16)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (16)
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (15)
- Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law (14)
- Northwestern University Law Review (14)
- Notre Dame Law Review (14)
- FIU Law Review (13)
- Brooklyn Law Review (12)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (11)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (11)
- Washington Law Review (11)
- Pepperdine Law Review (10)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (10)
- ConLawNOW (9)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (9)
- William & Mary Law Review (9)
- Catholic University Law Review (8)
- Michigan Law Review (8)
- Villanova Law Review (8)
- Maryland Law Review (7)
- Akron Law Review (6)
- BYU Law Review (6)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (6)
Articles 661 - 690 of 697
Full-Text Articles in Law
Constitutional Norm Entrepreneuring, Oren Tamir
Constitutional Norm Entrepreneuring, Oren Tamir
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bundle Of Joy: Why Same-Sex Married Couples Have A Constitutional Right To Enter Into Gestational Surrogacy Agreements, Benjamin H. Berman
Bundle Of Joy: Why Same-Sex Married Couples Have A Constitutional Right To Enter Into Gestational Surrogacy Agreements, Benjamin H. Berman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Debunking “De Minimis” Violations Of Prisoners’ Religious Rights: Further Problems With The Supreme Court’S “Hands Off” Approach, Samantha Sparacino
Debunking “De Minimis” Violations Of Prisoners’ Religious Rights: Further Problems With The Supreme Court’S “Hands Off” Approach, Samantha Sparacino
Touro Law Review
Circuits are split as there continues to be an inconsistent application of Supreme Court doctrine stemming from the notion of the separation of church and the state. Imprisonment does not strip a wrongdoer of his constitutionally guaranteed rights and protections. Some Circuits have held that a minor, or de minimis, interpretation of an inmate’s religious rights can constitute a substantial burden under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. In the absence of clear direction from the Supreme Court, I propose that courts should refrain from determining the value of a religious belief or practice as it relates …
Emergency Unamendability: Limitations On Constitutional Amendment In Extreme Conditions, Richard Albert, Yaniv Roznai
Emergency Unamendability: Limitations On Constitutional Amendment In Extreme Conditions, Richard Albert, Yaniv Roznai
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Makes An American Constitutional Revolution, And Are We Having One?, Carol Nackenoff
What Makes An American Constitutional Revolution, And Are We Having One?, Carol Nackenoff
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Counter-Majoritarian Constitutional Hardball, Robinson Woodward-Burns
Counter-Majoritarian Constitutional Hardball, Robinson Woodward-Burns
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Revolution" At The Capitol: How Law Hindered The Response To The Events Of January 6, 2021, Jill I. Goldenziel
"Revolution" At The Capitol: How Law Hindered The Response To The Events Of January 6, 2021, Jill I. Goldenziel
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Guilt By Association On The Docks And In The Casinos, Conor Byrnes
Guilt By Association On The Docks And In The Casinos, Conor Byrnes
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Of Arms And The Militia: Gun Regulation By Defining “Ordinary Military Equipment”, Edward J. Curtis
Of Arms And The Militia: Gun Regulation By Defining “Ordinary Military Equipment”, Edward J. Curtis
Touro Law Review
Recent mass shootings have placed pressure on Congress and state legislatures to regulate semi-automatic rifles and handguns in the interest of public safety. However, the Second Amendment provides that, “[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. There is no obvious public safety exception.
Semi-automatic rifles, handguns, and other kinds of arms can be regulated more effectively by defining the “ordinary military equipment” militia members are expected to provide. This may be accomplished using the rationale employed by the United States …
The State Of The State Action Doctrine: A Search For Accountability, Jordan Goodson
The State Of The State Action Doctrine: A Search For Accountability, Jordan Goodson
Touro Law Review
The state action doctrine is notoriously confusing and contradictory. It is also a weak mechanism for enforcing the constitutional accountability of both State and private actors. Many solutions to the doctrine's varied issues have been posed, but as of yet its problems have not been resolved. In fact, they continue to worsen, as increasing privatization combines with the doctrine's restrictions to narrow constitutional liability to the point of potential nullity. This article examines the doctrine's failures through the specific lens of accountability, demonstrating through analysis of recent caselaw how the doctrine — along with creating confusion and countless circuit splits …
My Body, My Choice: Biblical, Rabbinic, And Contemporary Halakhic Responses To Abortion, Adena Berkowitz
My Body, My Choice: Biblical, Rabbinic, And Contemporary Halakhic Responses To Abortion, Adena Berkowitz
Touro Law Review
Since the Supreme Court grounded the right to an abortion in a constitutional right to privacy, legal and societal debate has continued around the status of a fetus in utero, a woman’s countervailing claims, and the interests of states and society as a whole. As American courts have faced an issue that intertwines legal, moral, and philosophical questions, so too the halakhic process confronts analogous complexities. The main line of Jewish tradition makes a much-needed contribution to the discussion of abortion. Without sharing the view that the fetus is from conception fully a person, it stops short of a complete …
Fields V. Speaker Of Pennsylvania House Of Representatives, Heidi Moore
Fields V. Speaker Of Pennsylvania House Of Representatives, Heidi Moore
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Duress In Immigration Law, Elizabeth A. Keyes
Duress In Immigration Law, Elizabeth A. Keyes
Seattle University Law Review
The doctrine of duress is common to other bodies of law, but the application of the duress doctrine is both unclear and highly unstable in immigration law. Outside of immigration law, a person who commits a criminal act out of well-placed fear of terrible consequences is different than a person who willingly commits a crime, but American immigration law does not recognize this difference. The lack of clarity leads to certain absurd results and demands reimagining, redefinition, and an unequivocal statement of the significance of duress in ascertaining culpability. While there are inevitably some difficult lines to be drawn in …
No, It Is Not A Christian Nation, And It Never Has Been And Should Not Be One, Erwin Chemerinsky
No, It Is Not A Christian Nation, And It Never Has Been And Should Not Be One, Erwin Chemerinsky
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introductory Remarks, Michael Rogers, Hannah Hamley, Rayshaun D. Williams
Introductory Remarks, Michael Rogers, Hannah Hamley, Rayshaun D. Williams
Seattle University Law Review
Introductory Remarks.
Why Do The Poor Not Have A Constitutional Right To File Civil Claims In Court Under Their First Amendment Right To Petition The Government For A Redress Of Grievances?, Henry Rose
Seattle University Law Review
Since 1963, the United States Supreme Court has recognized a constitutional right for American groups, organizations, and persons to pursue civil litigation under the First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances. However, in three cases involving poor plaintiffs decided by the Supreme Court in the early 1970s—Boddie v. Connecticut,2 United States v. Kras,3 and Ortwein v. Schwab4—the Supreme Court rejected arguments that all persons have a constitutional right to access courts to pursue their civil legal claims.5 In the latter two cases, Kras and Ortwein, the Supreme Court concluded that poor persons were properly barred from …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents and Special Thanks.
Rock And Hard Place Arguments, Jareb Gleckel, Grace Brosofsky
Rock And Hard Place Arguments, Jareb Gleckel, Grace Brosofsky
Seattle University Law Review
This Article explores what we coin “rock and hard place” (RHP) arguments in the law, and it aims to motivate mission-driven plaintiffs to seek out such arguments in their cases. The RHP argument structure helps plaintiffs win cases even when the court views that outcome as unfavorable.
We begin by dissecting RHP dilemmas that have long existed in the American legal system. As Part I reveals, prosecutors and law enforcement officials have often taken advantage of RHP dilemmas and used them as a tool to persuade criminal defendants to forfeit their constitutional rights, confess, or give up the chance to …
The Deans' Roundtable, Dean Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Dean Danielle Conway, Dean Tamara Lawson, Dean Mario Barnes, Dean L. Song Richardson
The Deans' Roundtable, Dean Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Dean Danielle Conway, Dean Tamara Lawson, Dean Mario Barnes, Dean L. Song Richardson
Seattle University Law Review
The Deans' Roundtable.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents.
Revenge Of The Sixth: The Constitutional Reckoning Of Pandemic Justice, Brandon Marc Draper
Revenge Of The Sixth: The Constitutional Reckoning Of Pandemic Justice, Brandon Marc Draper
Marquette Law Review
The Sixth Amendment’s criminal jury right is integral to the United States
criminal justice system. While this right is also implicated by the Due Process
Clause, Equal Protection Clause, and several federal and state statutes,
criminal jury trial rates have been declining for decades, down from
approximately 20% to 2% between 1988 to 2018. This dramatic drop in the
rate of criminal jury trials is an effective measure of the decreased access to
fair and constitutional criminal jury trials.
Public Health Originalism And The First Amendment, Claudia E. Haupt, Wendy E. Parmet
Public Health Originalism And The First Amendment, Claudia E. Haupt, Wendy E. Parmet
Washington and Lee Law Review
Current First Amendment doctrine has set public health regulation and protections for commercial speech on a collision course. This Article examines the permissibility of compelled public health and safety warnings after the Supreme Court’s decision in National Institute of Family & Life Advocates v. Becerra (NIFLA) through the lens of a concurrence to the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision in American Beverage Ass’n v. City & County of San Francisco (American Beverage II) suggesting that only health and safety warnings dating back to 1791 are presumptively constitutional under the First Amendment.
Rejecting this form of “public health originalism,” this Article …
My Friend, Charles Reich, Hon. Guido Calabresi
Keeping Up: Walking With Justice Douglas, Charles A. Reich
Keeping Up: Walking With Justice Douglas, Charles A. Reich
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Charles Reich, New Dealer, John Q. Barrett
Charles Reich: Due Process In The Eye Of The Receiver, Harold Hongju Koh
Charles Reich: Due Process In The Eye Of The Receiver, Harold Hongju Koh
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Memory, Moral Reasoning, And Madison V. Alabama, Elias Feldman
Memory, Moral Reasoning, And Madison V. Alabama, Elias Feldman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Globalization And Privatization Of Federal Corporate Prosecutions: The Pressures Eroding Fifth Amendment Rights, Katarina Resar Krasulova
Globalization And Privatization Of Federal Corporate Prosecutions: The Pressures Eroding Fifth Amendment Rights, Katarina Resar Krasulova
Touro Law Review
Over the past several decades, our society has continued to become even more globalized and interconnected. The dynamic put increasing pressure on the fairness of criminal trials in domestic courts. This Article discusses two recent phenomena that illustrate this evolution and their impact on the defendants’ rights against selfincrimination: the globalization and privatization of the federal prosecutions. Globalization is understood as the United States’ Government’s increased reliance on foreign authorities in prosecution of cross-border crimes, while privatization denotes the Government’s reliance on private actors in conducting investigations. Investigations conducted by private entities and foreign governments, and the evidence those investigations …
Don't Change The Subject: How State Election Laws Can Nullify Ballot Questions, Cole Gordner
Don't Change The Subject: How State Election Laws Can Nullify Ballot Questions, Cole Gordner
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Procedural election laws regulate the conduct of state elections and provide for greater transparency and fairness in statewide ballots. These laws ensure that the public votes separately on incongruous bills and protects the electorate from uncertainties contained in omnibus packages. As demonstrated by a slew of recent court cases, however, interest groups that are opposed to the objective of a ballot question are utilizing these election laws with greater frequency either to prevent a state electorate from voting on an initiative or to overturn a ballot question that was already decided in the initiative’s favor. This practice is subverting the …
The People's Court: On The Intellectual Origins Of American Judicial Power, Ian C. Bartrum
The People's Court: On The Intellectual Origins Of American Judicial Power, Ian C. Bartrum
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
This article enters into the modern debate between “consti- tutional departmentalists”—who contend that the executive and legislative branches share constitutional interpretive authority with the courts—and what are sometimes called “judicial supremacists.” After exploring the relevant history of political ideas, I join the modern minority of voices in the latter camp.
This is an intellectual history of two evolving political ideas—popular sovereignty and the separation of powers—which merged in the making of American judicial power, and I argue we can only understand the structural function of judicial review by bringing these ideas together into an integrated whole. Or, put another way, …