Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (145)
- University of Georgia School of Law (61)
- William & Mary Law School (54)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (36)
- Notre Dame Law School (26)
-
- UC Law SF (25)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (23)
- Pepperdine University (16)
- University of Michigan Law School (15)
- Brigham Young University Law School (10)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (10)
- University of Massachusetts School of Law (10)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (9)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (9)
- West Virginia University (9)
- Pace University (8)
- Cleveland State University (6)
- Seattle University School of Law (6)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (6)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (6)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (6)
- Florida State University College of Law (5)
- University of Kentucky (5)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (5)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- UIC School of Law (4)
- University of Tennessee, Knoxville (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- University of the Pacific (4)
- Georgia State University College of Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (43)
- Constitutional law (39)
- New York (39)
- Supreme Court (38)
- Due process (29)
-
- Touro (28)
- First Amendment (26)
- Sixth Amendment (25)
- Abortion (22)
- Constitutional Law (19)
- Fifth Amendment (19)
- Fourteenth Amendment (19)
- Roe v. Wade (19)
- Supreme court (18)
- United States (17)
- Fourth Amendment (16)
- First amendment (14)
- Fourth amendment (13)
- Law (13)
- Law review (13)
- United States Constitution (13)
- Confrontation Clause (12)
- Immigration (12)
- Juries (12)
- Right to counsel (12)
- Court of Appeals (11)
- New york (11)
- Privacy (11)
- Capital Punishment (10)
- Free speech (10)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (145)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (56)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (33)
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law (32)
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (25)
-
- Notre Dame Law Review (24)
- William & Mary Law Review (20)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (19)
- University of Massachusetts Law Review (10)
- BYU Law Review (9)
- Utah Law Review (9)
- West Virginia Law Review (9)
- Indiana Law Journal (8)
- Michigan Law Review (8)
- Pepperdine Law Review (8)
- Catholic University Law Review (7)
- Florida Law Review (6)
- Pace Law Review (6)
- Seattle University Law Review (6)
- Cleveland State Law Review (5)
- Florida State University Law Review (5)
- Georgia Law Review (5)
- Nevada Law Journal (5)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (5)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (5)
- JCL Online (4)
- Maryland Law Review (4)
- McGeorge Law Review (4)
- Oklahoma Law Review (4)
- Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy (4)
Articles 571 - 587 of 587
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Dormant Commerce Clause, The Twenty-First Amendment, And A Freer Wine Market: Why Kentucky Must Wine-Down Its Protectionist Laws Restricting The Direct Shipment Of Wine From Out-Of-State Wineries, Aubrey K. Vaughan
Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law
No abstract provided.
"Hobby-Lobby"-Ing For Religious Freedom: Crafting The Religious Employer Exemption To The Ppaca, Emily Pitt Mattingly
"Hobby-Lobby"-Ing For Religious Freedom: Crafting The Religious Employer Exemption To The Ppaca, Emily Pitt Mattingly
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Kentucky Religious Freedom Act: Neither A Savior For The Free Exercise Of Religion Nor A Monstrous Threat To Civil Rights, Jennifer A. Pekman
The Kentucky Religious Freedom Act: Neither A Savior For The Free Exercise Of Religion Nor A Monstrous Threat To Civil Rights, Jennifer A. Pekman
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Recent Development: Motor Vehicle Admin. V. Deering: A Driver Whose License Is Suspended Under The "Implied Consent, Administrative Per Se Law" Is Not Entitled To Consult With An Attorney Before Deciding Whether To Take A Breath Test, Patrick Toohey
University of Baltimore Law Forum
The Court of Appeals of Maryland held the implied consent, administrative per se law (“administrative per se law”) does not require that a suspected drunk driver be given the opportunity to consult an attorney before deciding whether to take a breath test. Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Deering, 438 Md. 611, 637, 92 A.3d 495, 511 (2014). The court found that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution does not establish a pre-test right to counsel for a suspected drunk driver in an administrative proceeding.
Solitary Confinement, Public Safety, And Recdivism, Shira E. Gordon
Solitary Confinement, Public Safety, And Recdivism, Shira E. Gordon
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
As of 2005, about 80,000 prisoners were housed in solitary confinement in jails and in state and federal prisons in the United States. Prisoners in solitary confinement are generally housed in a cell for twenty-two to twenty-four hours a day with little human contact or interaction. The number of prisoners held in solitary confinement increased 40 percent between 1995 and 2000, in comparison to the growth in the total prison population of 28 percent. Concurrently, the duration of time that prisoners spend in solitary confinement also increased: nationally, most prisoners in solitary confinement spend more than five years there. The …
Evolving Values, Animus, And Same-Sex Marriage, Daniel O. Conkle
Evolving Values, Animus, And Same-Sex Marriage, Daniel O. Conkle
Indiana Law Journal
In this Essay, I contend that a Fourteenth Amendment right to same-sex marriage will emerge, and properly so, when the Supreme Court determines that justice so requires and when, in the words of Professor Alexander Bickel, the Court’s recognition of this right will “in a rather immediate foreseeable future . . . gain general assent.” I suggest that we are fast approaching that juncture, and I go on to analyze three possible justifications for such a ruling: first, substantive due process; second, heightened scrutiny equal protection; and third, rational basis equal protection coupled with a finding of illicit “animus.” I …
Bringing In The Sheaves: Home Grown Wheat, Weed, And Limits On The Commerce Clause, M. Reed Hopper
Bringing In The Sheaves: Home Grown Wheat, Weed, And Limits On The Commerce Clause, M. Reed Hopper
Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law
No abstract provided.
Failure To Report: The Manifestly Unconstitutional Nature Of The Human Smugglers Act, Jennifer Bond
Failure To Report: The Manifestly Unconstitutional Nature Of The Human Smugglers Act, Jennifer Bond
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
This paper uses the Human Smugglers Act as a case study of what can happen when a Canadian government tables legislation that is highly controversial not only for reasons of ideology or policy, but also because it almost certainly violates the Charter. The conclusion is twofold: first, that a requirement originally meant to increase government accountability in the face of Canada’s human rights instruments is failing; and second, that this same requirement is now providing the government political cover to deflect legitimate constitutional critique while simultaneously avoiding substantive engagement. The result is an impoverished constitutional dialogue and a misled Canadian …
Values At Work: How Sex Discrimination Law Moved From Joke To Juggernaut In 50 Years, Kimberly A. Yuracko
Values At Work: How Sex Discrimination Law Moved From Joke To Juggernaut In 50 Years, Kimberly A. Yuracko
Valparaiso University Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Alvarez: Defaming The Medal Of Honor Through Lies, Deceit, And The First Amendment, Christine Mcwilliams
United States V. Alvarez: Defaming The Medal Of Honor Through Lies, Deceit, And The First Amendment, Christine Mcwilliams
Valparaiso University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Canadian Bijuralism At A Crossroad? The Impact Of Section 8.1 Of The Interpretation Act On Judicial Interpretation Of Federal Legislation, Aline Grenon
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
Section 8.1 of the Interpretation Act affirms the equal authority of the common law and civil law in the field of property and civil rights. The section states, subject to two exceptions, that federal enactments based on rules and concepts that are part of the law of property and civil rights are to be interpreted in accordance with these rules and concepts. Prior to the enactment of section 8.1 in 2001, courts had a tendency to opt for a uniform application of federal legislation based on common law concepts, with often negative results for Quebec civil law. Since then, the …
Chapter 623: Giving The Wrongfully Convicted A Better Chance At Review, Natasha Machado
Chapter 623: Giving The Wrongfully Convicted A Better Chance At Review, Natasha Machado
McGeorge Law Review
No abstract provided.
Has Society Become Tolerant Of Further Infringement On First Amendment Rights?, Nicholas Primrose
Has Society Become Tolerant Of Further Infringement On First Amendment Rights?, Nicholas Primrose
Barry Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Purpose Of The Fourth Amendment And Crafting Rules To Implement That Purpose, Thomas K. Clancy
The Purpose Of The Fourth Amendment And Crafting Rules To Implement That Purpose, Thomas K. Clancy
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Defeating A Wolf Clad As A Wolf: Formalism And Functionalism In Separation-Of-Powers Suits Against The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Lee A. Deneen
Georgia Law Review
In 2010, the Court decided Free Enterprise Fund, engaging in a substantially formalist analysis of the President's removal power. That same year, Congress authorized creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a federal agency with significant regulatory and enforcement power over the consumer finance industry. Within three years of that legislation, two lawsuits have challenged the CFPB's structure. This Note evaluates the arguments of the CFPB's opponents against the backdrop of Free Enterprise Fund and the Roberts Court's other formalist decisions. Although one might expect complaints against the CFPB to be lodged solely in formalist terms, the CFPB's opponents have …
Beyond A Reasonable Doubt: The Constitutionality Of Georgia's Burden Of Proof In Executing The Mentally Retarded, Veronica M. O'Grady
Beyond A Reasonable Doubt: The Constitutionality Of Georgia's Burden Of Proof In Executing The Mentally Retarded, Veronica M. O'Grady
Georgia Law Review
In 2002, the Supreme Court in Atkins v. Virginia announced that executing mentally retarded defendants violates the Constitution. Georgia's standard for determining whether a criminal defendant is mentally retarded-and therefore ineligible for the death penalty- is the highest in the nation, requiring defendants to prove mental retardation to a jury, during the guilt and innocence phase, beyond a reasonable doubt. As in the case of Warren Lee Hill, Jr., this high burden necessarily results in Georgia executing defendants who are almost certainly mentally retarded,arguably violating the Atkins directive. Though once the first state to create a ban on executing the …
The Collapsing Constitution, Michael D. Cicchini
The Collapsing Constitution, Michael D. Cicchini
Hofstra Law Review
No abstract provided.