Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- United States (5)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Item Veto (2)
- Judicial Process (2)
- Legislative Power (2)
-
- Legislative Process (2)
- Parliamentary Procedure (2)
- Appeals (1)
- Appellate Courts (1)
- Certiorari (1)
- Confirmation Hearings (1)
- Constitutional Interpretation (1)
- Federal Court Judges (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial Power (1)
- Judicial Selection (1)
- Legal Interpretation (1)
- Legal Theory (1)
- Original Intent (1)
- Rescission (1)
- Retroactive Judicial Decisions (1)
- Separation of Powers (1)
- Trade Act of 2002 (1)
- Treaty-Making Power (1)
- United States Constitution (1)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (1)
- Vacatur (1)
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Law
Using Statutes To Set Legislative Rules: Entrenchment, Separation Of Powers, And The Rules Of Proceedings Clause, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Using Statutes To Set Legislative Rules: Entrenchment, Separation Of Powers, And The Rules Of Proceedings Clause, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
No abstract provided.
The New Line Item Veto Proposal: This Time It’S Constitutional (Mostly), Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
The New Line Item Veto Proposal: This Time It’S Constitutional (Mostly), Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court’S Controversial Gvrs – And An Alternative, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
The Supreme Court’S Controversial Gvrs – And An Alternative, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
This Article addresses a relatively neglected portion of the Supreme Court's docket: the "GVR"-that is, the Court's procedure for summarily granting certiorari, vacating the decision below without finding error, and remanding the case for further consideration by the lower court. The purpose of the GVR device is to give the lower court the initial opportunity to consider the possible impact of a new development (such as a recently issued Supreme Court decision) and, if necessary, to revise its ruling in light of the changed circumstances. The Court may issue scores or even hundreds of these orders every year
This Article …
Statutory Interpretation And The Rest Of The Iceberg: Divergences Between The Lower Federal Courts And The Supreme Court, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Statutory Interpretation And The Rest Of The Iceberg: Divergences Between The Lower Federal Courts And The Supreme Court, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
This Article examines the methods of statutory interpretation used by the lower federal courts, especially the federal district courts, and compares those methods to the practices of the U.S. Supreme Court. This novel research reveals both similarities across courts and some striking differences. The research shows that some interpretive tools are highly overrepresented in the Supreme Court’s decisions, while other tools are much more prevalent in the lower courts. Differences in prevalence persist even after accounting for the selection effect that stems from the Supreme Court’s discretionary docket. Another finding—based on a study of 40 years of cases from all …
Rationing The Constitution: Beyond And Below, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Rationing The Constitution: Beyond And Below, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
No abstract provided.
Return Of The Line Item Veto? Legalities, Practicalities, And Some Puzzles, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Return Of The Line Item Veto? Legalities, Practicalities, And Some Puzzles, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
No abstract provided.
If The Judicial Confirmation Process Is Broken, Can A Statute Fix It?, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
If The Judicial Confirmation Process Is Broken, Can A Statute Fix It?, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
No abstract provided.
Poll/Contest: What Shape Is The Constitution?, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Poll/Contest: What Shape Is The Constitution?, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
No abstract provided.
How Should Elected Judges Interpret Statutes?, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
How Should Elected Judges Interpret Statutes?, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
No abstract provided.
Courtside, Paul M. Smith, Katherine A. Fallow, Daniel Mach, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Courtside, Paul M. Smith, Katherine A. Fallow, Daniel Mach, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
No abstract provided.
Against Mix-And-Match Lawmaking, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Against Mix-And-Match Lawmaking, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
No abstract provided.
Burying The “Continuing Body” Theory Of The Senate, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Burying The “Continuing Body” Theory Of The Senate, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
In the U.S. Senate, only one-third of the members stand for election every two years; the rest carry over from one congressional term to the next. In this regard the Senate differs from the House of Representatives, where all members stand for election every two-year cycle. That much is familiar, but what legal consequences flow from this structural difference? According to some legislators, courts, and commentators, this difference is very important in that it makes the Senate, but not the House, a "continuing body." The continuing-body idea is invoked to defend highly controversial aspects of Senate practice. By far the …