Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Federal Communications Commission (11)
- FCC (9)
- Media (8)
- Public interest (7)
- Television (7)
-
- Open government (6)
- Oral arguments (6)
- United States Supreme Court (6)
- Transparency (5)
- Access to information (4)
- Collective Action Problem (4)
- First Responders (4)
- Internet (4)
- Interoperability (4)
- Public Safety Agencies (4)
- Public Safety Communications (4)
- Book Review (3)
- Competition (3)
- Indecency (3)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Masthead (3)
- Privacy (3)
- Regulation (3)
- Telecommunications Act (3)
- Broadcasting (2)
- Complaints (2)
- DBS (2)
- Diversity (2)
- Editor's Note (2)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (2)
- Publication
-
- Federal Communications Law Journal (25)
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (15)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (6)
- BYU Law Review (4)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (2)
-
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (2)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (2)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- CommLaw Conspectus: Journal of Communications Law and Technology Policy (1993-2015) (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- The Modern American (1)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (1)
Articles 61 - 63 of 63
Full-Text Articles in Law
C-Span's Long And Winding Road To A Still Un-Televised Supreme Court, Bruce D. Collins
C-Span's Long And Winding Road To A Still Un-Televised Supreme Court, Bruce D. Collins
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
In 2005 when Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) first proposed legislation requiring the Supreme Court of the United States to televise its oral arguments, he resuscitated a twenty-plus-years long effort by several news organizations to achieve the same goal. For at least that long, C-SPAN has been ready to provide the same kind of video coverage of the federal judiciary as it has been providing of the Congress and the president. If cameras are ever permitted in the high Court’s chamber, C-SPAN will televise every minute of every oral argument, frequently on a live basis, and will do so in its …
Fencing In The Frontier: A Look Into The Limits Of Mail Fraud, Kristen Kate Orr
Fencing In The Frontier: A Look Into The Limits Of Mail Fraud, Kristen Kate Orr
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Calling All Angles: Perspectives On Regulating Internet Telephony, Melissa Winberg
Calling All Angles: Perspectives On Regulating Internet Telephony, Melissa Winberg
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
In 1996, Congress passed the Telecommunications Act, substantially revising the Communications Act of 1934 to reflect technological advances, including the Internet, and Congress's deregulatory goals. Currently, however, new technologies are challenging the viability of the statutory definitions and regulatory schemes of the statute. Internet telephony, commonly called Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), is both a replacement for traditional telephone service and a new web-based technology. Given the current competitive political climate and the magnitude of the interests involved, Congress is unlikely to succeed in altering the telecommunications regime. Thus, the Federal Communications Commission, which has the authority to regulate interstate …