Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Civil Rights and Discrimination

1990

Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 31 - 60 of 172

Full-Text Articles in Law

Women Lawyers And The Quest For Professional Identity In Late Nineteenth-Century America, Virginia G. Drachman Aug 1990

Women Lawyers And The Quest For Professional Identity In Late Nineteenth-Century America, Virginia G. Drachman

Michigan Law Review

Whenever Lelia Robinson, a nineteenth-century woman lawyer, prepared to take a case to court, she faced a particular problem what to do about her hat. "Shall the woman attorney wear her hat when arguing a case or making a motion in court," she asked in 1888, "or shall she remove it?" Robinson's question was not a frivolous matter of fashion, but a serious concern to every woman lawyer who entered the courtroom. As a proper lady of her day, it was not only appropriate that she wear a hat in public, it was expected of her. But as a lawyer, …


Public Remedies For Private Wrongs: Rethinking The Title Vii Back Pay Remedy, Minna J. Kotkin Aug 1990

Public Remedies For Private Wrongs: Rethinking The Title Vii Back Pay Remedy, Minna J. Kotkin

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Labor Dept. Wants To Take On Job Bias In The Executivesuite, Peters T. Kilborn Jul 1990

Labor Dept. Wants To Take On Job Bias In The Executivesuite, Peters T. Kilborn

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


Why Women Aren't Getting To The Top, Jaclyn Fierman Jul 1990

Why Women Aren't Getting To The Top, Jaclyn Fierman

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


Audit Firm: Victim Or Accomplice, Alison Leigh Cowan Jul 1990

Audit Firm: Victim Or Accomplice, Alison Leigh Cowan

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No. 90-7099 Order With Note From Lawyer, United States Court Of Appeals Jul 1990

No. 90-7099 Order With Note From Lawyer, United States Court Of Appeals

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No. 90-7099 Reply In Support Of Summary Affirmance, United States Court Of Appeals Jul 1990

No. 90-7099 Reply In Support Of Summary Affirmance, United States Court Of Appeals

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


Good Huntin, Ian Williams Jul 1990

Good Huntin, Ian Williams

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No. 90-7099 Opposition To Motion For Summary Affirmance, United States Court Of Appeals Jul 1990

No. 90-7099 Opposition To Motion For Summary Affirmance, United States Court Of Appeals

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No. 90-7099 Order, United States Court Of Appeals Jul 1990

No. 90-7099 Order, United States Court Of Appeals

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No. 84-3040 Plaintiff's Proposed Decree, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Jul 1990

No. 84-3040 Plaintiff's Proposed Decree, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No. 84-3040 Plaintiff's Proposed Findings Of Fact On Relief, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Jul 1990

No. 84-3040 Plaintiff's Proposed Findings Of Fact On Relief, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No. 84-3040 Plaintiff's Proposed Findings Of Fact, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Jul 1990

No. 84-3040 Plaintiff's Proposed Findings Of Fact, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


Getting Mad, Then Getting Even, Deborah L. Jacobs Jul 1990

Getting Mad, Then Getting Even, Deborah L. Jacobs

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


Foreword: Freedom And Tenure In The Academy: The Fiftieth Anniversary Of The 1940 Statement Of Principles, William W. Van Alstyne Jul 1990

Foreword: Freedom And Tenure In The Academy: The Fiftieth Anniversary Of The 1940 Statement Of Principles, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Publications

This forward comments on the shared anniversary of the Bill of Rights and several declarations of academic freedom. Several of the preceding articles are intended to discuss academic freedom and the need for its protection in the U.S.


Academic Freedom And The First Amendment In The Supreme Court Of The United States: An Unhurried Historical Review, William W. Van Alstyne Jul 1990

Academic Freedom And The First Amendment In The Supreme Court Of The United States: An Unhurried Historical Review, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


No. 90-7099 Order 29june1990, United States Court Of Appeals Jun 1990

No. 90-7099 Order 29june1990, United States Court Of Appeals

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No. 90-7099 Reply To Opposition To Emergency Motion For Stay - Preliminary Statement, United States Court Of Appeals For The District Of Columbia Circuit Jun 1990

No. 90-7099 Reply To Opposition To Emergency Motion For Stay - Preliminary Statement, United States Court Of Appeals For The District Of Columbia Circuit

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No. 90-7099 Motion For Summary Affirmance, United States Court Of Appeals Jun 1990

No. 90-7099 Motion For Summary Affirmance, United States Court Of Appeals

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No- 90-7099 Appellee's Opposition To Emergency Motion For Stay, United States Court Of Appeals Jun 1990

No- 90-7099 Appellee's Opposition To Emergency Motion For Stay, United States Court Of Appeals

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No. 90-7099 Emergency Motion For Stay, United States Court Of Appeals Jun 1990

No. 90-7099 Emergency Motion For Stay, United States Court Of Appeals

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No. 84-3040 Order 25june1990, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Jun 1990

No. 84-3040 Order 25june1990, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No. 84-3040 Plaintiff's Opposition To Defendant's Motion For Stay Pending Appeal, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Jun 1990

No. 84-3040 Plaintiff's Opposition To Defendant's Motion For Stay Pending Appeal, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No. 84-3040 Motion For Stay Pending Appeal And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Motion For Stay, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Jun 1990

No. 84-3040 Motion For Stay Pending Appeal And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Motion For Stay, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


No. 84-3040 Notice Of Appeal, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Jun 1990

No. 84-3040 Notice Of Appeal, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


Princess Charming At Price Waterhouse, Daniel Seligman Jun 1990

Princess Charming At Price Waterhouse, Daniel Seligman

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


How About "Mea Culpa?", Sheila Anne Feeney Jun 1990

How About "Mea Culpa?", Sheila Anne Feeney

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


She Didn't Get Her Partnership, Pamela Mendels Jun 1990

She Didn't Get Her Partnership, Pamela Mendels

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


Bad Image, Like Shadow, Is Hard To Shake, Genenieve Buck Jun 1990

Bad Image, Like Shadow, Is Hard To Shake, Genenieve Buck

Ann B. Hopkins Papers

No abstract provided.


Pure Politics, Girardeau A. Spann Jun 1990

Pure Politics, Girardeau A. Spann

Michigan Law Review

Part I of this article considers the impact that judicial discretion has on the traditional model of judicial review, and that model's reliance on the Supreme Court as the primary guardian of minority interests. Part II argues that the interests of racial minorities can be better advanced through the ordinary political process than through the process of Supreme Court adjudication. Part Ill emphasizes that minority participation in Supreme Court proceedings cannot ultimately be avoided and, accordingly, suggests a political model of the Court that minorities can use in an effort to neutralize the Court's distortion of the political process. Part …