Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

Employment Discrimination—Title Vii's Limited Preemptive Effect Allows State Laws Mandating Pregnancy Leave And Reinstatement, Mary L. Wiseman Oct 1986

Employment Discrimination—Title Vii's Limited Preemptive Effect Allows State Laws Mandating Pregnancy Leave And Reinstatement, Mary L. Wiseman

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Beyond Busing: Inside The Challenge To Urban Segregation, Lawrence T. Gresser Apr 1986

Beyond Busing: Inside The Challenge To Urban Segregation, Lawrence T. Gresser

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Beyond Busing: Inside the Challenge to Urban Segregation by Paul R. Dimond


The New American Dilemma: Liberal Democracy And School Desegregation, Mary Jo Newborn Apr 1986

The New American Dilemma: Liberal Democracy And School Desegregation, Mary Jo Newborn

Michigan Law Review

A Review of The New American Dilemma: Liberal Democracy and School Desegregation by Jennifer L. Hochschild


Insurance Classification: Too Important To Be Left To The Actuaries, Leah Wortham Jan 1986

Insurance Classification: Too Important To Be Left To The Actuaries, Leah Wortham

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This Article classifies most of the public debate about classification as coming from one of two perspectives labeled traditional fair discrimination and antidiscrimination. Proponents of the status quo in classification and its regulation justify that status quo as fair discrimination. They argue that fair discrimination is both desirable and a reflection of a long-standing public policy judgment embodied in state law.


An Observation About Comparable Worth, George Schatzki Jan 1986

An Observation About Comparable Worth, George Schatzki

Seattle University Law Review

The ultimate legal question is: Does Title VII incorporate the comparable worth doctrine? The courts are saying, "No." Their reasoning is, at best, unpersuasive. Indeed, often their reasoning is nothing more than mere conclusion. Given what I have described briefly as the legal arguments pro and con, one can easily understand that so long as Griggs remains a part of the Title VII scene, there is a rational but not compelling argument to incorporate comparable worth into the Act. How, then, does a court decide? The following discussion is offered not as an example of desirable or undesirable judicial analysis. …


Direct Evidence Of Discriminatory Intent And The Burden Of Proof: An Analysis And Critique , Charles A. Edwards Jan 1986

Direct Evidence Of Discriminatory Intent And The Burden Of Proof: An Analysis And Critique , Charles A. Edwards

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.