Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Civil Procedure

2013

Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 301 - 320 of 320

Full-Text Articles in Law

Cases On Criminal Procedure, Robert Bloom Dec 2012

Cases On Criminal Procedure, Robert Bloom

Robert M. Bloom

No abstract provided.


The American Legal Profession In Crisis: Resistance And Responses To Change, James Moliterno Dec 2012

The American Legal Profession In Crisis: Resistance And Responses To Change, James Moliterno

James E. Moliterno

Reviewed by Herbert Kritzner in Law and Politics Book Review, 227-231.


Experiencing Civil Procedure, James Moliterno Dec 2012

Experiencing Civil Procedure, James Moliterno

James E. Moliterno

No abstract provided.


Easing The Guidance Document Dilemma Agency By Agency: Immigration Law And Not Really Binding Rules, Jill Family Dec 2012

Easing The Guidance Document Dilemma Agency By Agency: Immigration Law And Not Really Binding Rules, Jill Family

Jill E. Family

Immigration law relies on rules that bind effectively, but not legally, to adjudicate millions of applications for immigration benefits every year. This article provides a blueprint for immigration law to improve its use of these practically binding rules, often called guidance documents. The agency that adjudicates immigration benefit applications, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), should develop and adopt its own Good Guidance Practices to govern how it uses guidance documents. This article recommends both a mechanism for reform, the Good Guidance Practices, and tackles many complex issues that USCIS will need to address in creating its practices. The …


Moore's Federal Practice (2013 Edition), Daniel Coquillette Dec 2012

Moore's Federal Practice (2013 Edition), Daniel Coquillette

Daniel R. Coquillette

Moore's Federal Practice is the backbone of any federal litigator's library. Comprehensive and authoritative, Moore's is written by the judges, lawyers, and professors who write and amend the Federal Rules, and is LexisNexis Matthew Bender's flagship treatise on federal civil, criminal, appellate, and admiralty procedure.

The first edition of this venerable work was written by the late Professor James William Moore, one of the original drafters of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in 1938. From its initial publication, Moore's instantly became, and remains today, the standard reference work on federal court procedure and has been cited thousands of times …


Professional Responsibility, James Moliterno Dec 2012

Professional Responsibility, James Moliterno

James E. Moliterno

No abstract provided.


Workplace Data: Law & Litigation (With 2014 Supplement), Robert Sprague Dec 2012

Workplace Data: Law & Litigation (With 2014 Supplement), Robert Sprague

Robert Sprague

Workplace Data: Law and Litigation provides an overview of legal issues associated with employment-related electronically stored information (ESI), focusing on discovery issues in particular. Written for employment and labor law practitioners, this new treatise offers a comprehensive overview of today’s discovery challenges, a detailed statute-by-statute analysis of data retention requirements in federal workplace-related laws, a summary of emerging workplace social media and other technology-related issues and a guide to data protection privacy laws in North America, Europe, Asia and Oceania.


Future Conduct And The Limits Of Class-Action Settlements, James Grimmelmann Dec 2012

Future Conduct And The Limits Of Class-Action Settlements, James Grimmelmann

James Grimmelmann

This Article identifies a new and previously unrecognized trend in class-action settlements: releases for the defendant’s future conduct. Such releases, which hold the defendant harmless for wrongs it will commit in the future, are unusually dangerous to class members and to the public. Even more than the “future claims” familiar to class-action scholars, future-conduct releases pose severe informational problems for class members and for courts. Worse, they create moral hazard for the defendant, give it concentrated power, and thrust courts into a prospective planning role they are ill-equipped to handle.

Courts should guard against the dangers of future-conduct releases with …


Superiority As Unity, Jay Tidmarsh Dec 2012

Superiority As Unity, Jay Tidmarsh

Jay Tidmarsh

One of Professor Redish’s many important contributions to legal scholarship is his recent work on class actions. Grounding his argument in the theory of democratic accountability that has been at the centerpiece of all his work, Professor Redish suggests that, in nearly all instances, class actions violate the individual autonomy of litigants and should not be used by courts. This Essay begins from the opposite premise: that class actions should be grounded in the notion of social utility rather than autonomy so that class actions should be used whenever they achieve net social gains. This idea of “superiority” presents some …


It’S All About The People: Hierarchy, Networks, And Teaching Assistants In A Civil Procedure Classroom Community, Jennifer E. Spreng Dec 2012

It’S All About The People: Hierarchy, Networks, And Teaching Assistants In A Civil Procedure Classroom Community, Jennifer E. Spreng

Jennifer E Spreng

This article provides a blueprint for a “civic community in a law school classroom” that would better prepare many students for what is likely to be their professional future based on natural social hierarchy and network dynamics. It uses experiences from the author's own teaching career to illustrate hierarchy and network dynamics and how to use them to enrich the pedagogical and social experience of a first year course. It also roots those experiences in principles from social psychology, organizational behavior, transformative leadership and all levels of education literature.

Modern law school classrooms fall into two categories: the "polar model" …


State Courts And Transitory Torts In Transnational Human Rights Cases, Chimene I. Keitner Dec 2012

State Courts And Transitory Torts In Transnational Human Rights Cases, Chimene I. Keitner

Chimene I Keitner

No abstract provided.


Evidence, Probability, And The Burden Of Proof, Ronald J. Allen, Alex Stein Dec 2012

Evidence, Probability, And The Burden Of Proof, Ronald J. Allen, Alex Stein

Alex Stein

This Article analyzes the probabilistic and epistemological underpinnings of the burden-of-proof doctrine. We show that this doctrine is best understood as instructing factfinders to determine which of the parties’ conflicting stories makes most sense in terms of coherence, consilience, causality, and evidential coverage. By applying this method, factfinders should try—and will often succeed—to establish the truth, rather than a statistical surrogate of the truth, while securing the appropriate allocation of the risk of error. Descriptively, we argue that this understanding of the doctrine—the “relative plausibility theory”—corresponds to our courts’ practice. Prescriptively, we argue that the relative-plausibility method is operationally superior …


Disaggregating, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch Dec 2012

Disaggregating, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch

Elizabeth Chamblee Burch

Commonality is a defining characteristic of mass-tort litigation. But mass-tort claimants typically do not share enough in common to warrant class certification. That is, commonality does not predominate. Yet, without class certification, judges cannot conclude these cases as a unit absent a private settlement. This paradox prompts two questions. First, what level of commonality justifies aggregating mass torts, shorn of Rule 23’s procedural protections? And, second, should the federal judicial system continue to centralize claims with nominal commonality when judges typically cannot resolve them collectively absent a private settlement? This Article’s title suggests one answer: if minimal commonality continues to …


The Reappearing Judge, Steven S. Gensler, Lee H. Rosenthal Dec 2012

The Reappearing Judge, Steven S. Gensler, Lee H. Rosenthal

Steven S. Gensler

No abstract provided.


Ed Cooper, Rule 56, And Charles E. Clark's Fountain Of Youth, Steven S. Gensler Dec 2012

Ed Cooper, Rule 56, And Charles E. Clark's Fountain Of Youth, Steven S. Gensler

Steven S. Gensler

No abstract provided.


Efectos De La Constitucionalización Del Arbitraje, Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba Dec 2012

Efectos De La Constitucionalización Del Arbitraje, Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba

Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba

Se analiza aquí cuáles son los efectos de que la Carta suprema del Ecuador haya reconocido la figura de los medios alternativos de solución de conflictos, entre los que se encuentra el arbitraje. Primero se relata la historia de esta constitucionalización (cap. I), para luego revisar cómo se acoplan estos medios al principio constitucional de unidad jurisdiccional (cap. II). En los capítulos III a VII se analiza la naturaleza de estos medios, que ha de considerarse como el núcleo esencial del derecho constitucional a usar estos medios. Los capítulos VIII y IX analizan otros efectos adicionales: la garantía de inderogabilidad …


Adequately Representing Groups, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch Dec 2012

Adequately Representing Groups, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch

Elizabeth Chamblee Burch

Adequate representation and preclusion depend on whether the courts treat a litigant as part of a group experiencing an aggregate harm or as a distinct person suffering individual injuries. And though a vast literature about adequate representation exists in the class-action context, it thins dramatically when contemplating other forms of group litigation, such as parens patriae actions and multidistrict litigation. As class actions have gradually fallen into disfavor and attorneys and commentators seek alternative means for resolving group harms, the relative clarity of Rule 23 wanes. How should courts evaluate adequate representation in parens patriae actions and in multidistrict litigation? …


Courts Should Apply A Relatively More Stringent Pleading Threshold To Class Actions, Matthew Lawrence Dec 2012

Courts Should Apply A Relatively More Stringent Pleading Threshold To Class Actions, Matthew Lawrence

Matthew B. Lawrence

Policymakers from Senator Edward Kennedy to Civil Rules Advisory Committee Reporter Edward Cooper have proposed that class actions be subject to a more stringent pleading threshold than individually-filed suits, yet the question has not been fully explored in legal scholarship. This Article addresses that gap. It shows that courts following the guidance of Bell Atlantic v. Twombly should apply a relatively more stringent pleading threshold to class actions, and a relatively less stringent threshold to individually-filed suits.

This contribution is set forth in two steps. First, this Article explains that, all else being equal, the anticipated systems’ costs and benefits …


The Use Of Tenant Screening Reports And Tenant Blacklisting—2013, Gerald Lebovits Dec 2012

The Use Of Tenant Screening Reports And Tenant Blacklisting—2013, Gerald Lebovits

Hon. Gerald Lebovits

No abstract provided.


Ethical Issues In Appellate Courts, Jack E. Morris Dec 2012

Ethical Issues In Appellate Courts, Jack E. Morris

Jack E Morris

The rules of ethics governing the work of lawyers in state and federal appellate courts in Louisiana derive from the Louisiana Rules of Professional Conduct in general, and from select articles and rules in the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure, the Louisiana Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and the U.S. Fifth Circuit Rules. This article explores some of the ethical issues implicated by the application of these rules to the handling of appeals.