Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (11)
- Virginia (10)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (8)
- Civil (8)
- Damages (6)
-
- Evidence (6)
- Nonsuit (6)
- Standing (6)
- Statute (6)
- Jurisdiction (5)
- Jury (5)
- Res judicata (5)
- Index (4)
- Judgment (4)
- Liability (4)
- Relief (4)
- Tort (4)
- Trial (4)
- ABA (3)
- Action (3)
- Appeal (3)
- Bulala v. Boyd (3)
- Defendant (3)
- Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins (3)
- Expert (3)
- Expert testimony (3)
- Foreign (3)
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. York (3)
- Plaintiff (3)
- Procedure (3)
Articles 31 - 60 of 126
Full-Text Articles in Law
Election Of Remedies In The Twenty-First Century: Centra Health, Inc. V. Mullins, L. Steven Emmert
Election Of Remedies In The Twenty-First Century: Centra Health, Inc. V. Mullins, L. Steven Emmert
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Practice And Procedure, Hon. Jane Marum Roush
Civil Practice And Procedure, Hon. Jane Marum Roush
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Superpoked And Served: Service Of Process Via Social Networking Sites, Andriana L. Shultz
Superpoked And Served: Service Of Process Via Social Networking Sites, Andriana L. Shultz
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Independent Of The Constitution?--Issues Raised By An Independent Federal Legislative Ethics Commission With Independent Enforcement Authority, Paul Taylor
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pro Se Litigation: Best Practices From A Judge's Perspective, Hon. Beverly W. Snukals, Glen H. Sturtevant Jr.
Pro Se Litigation: Best Practices From A Judge's Perspective, Hon. Beverly W. Snukals, Glen H. Sturtevant Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Practice And Procedure, John C. Lynch, Jon S. Hubbard, M. Elizabeth Woodard
Civil Practice And Procedure, John C. Lynch, Jon S. Hubbard, M. Elizabeth Woodard
University of Richmond Law Review
This article summarizes the major developments in Virginia civil practice and procedure over the past two years, specifically covering significant decisions by the Supreme Court of Virginiaand changes to the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia dating from April 22, 2005, to April 20, 2007. The article also addresses legislative enactments by the General Assembly in its 2005 and 2006 sessions.
The History And Scope Of The Virginia Declaratory Judgments Act, Seth M. Land
The History And Scope Of The Virginia Declaratory Judgments Act, Seth M. Land
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Safe Harbor Of 35 U.S.C. § 271(E)(1): The End Of Enforceable Biotechnology Patents In Drug Discovery?, Paul T. Nyffeler
The Safe Harbor Of 35 U.S.C. § 271(E)(1): The End Of Enforceable Biotechnology Patents In Drug Discovery?, Paul T. Nyffeler
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proving Lost Profits Under Daubert: Five Questions Every Court Should Ask Before Admitting Expert Testimony, Robert M. Lloyd
Proving Lost Profits Under Daubert: Five Questions Every Court Should Ask Before Admitting Expert Testimony, Robert M. Lloyd
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Medical Malpractice Law, Kathleen M. Mccauley, Dana A. Dews
Medical Malpractice Law, Kathleen M. Mccauley, Dana A. Dews
University of Richmond Law Review
With President George W. Bush's promise to continue working toward tort reform, medical malpractice issues are once again garnering media and voter attention. This article examines recent judicial decisions and statutory amendments affecting patients and health care providers in the commonwealth in the context of medical malpractice law.
The Merger Of Common-Law And Equity Pleading In Virginia, W. Hamilton Bryson
The Merger Of Common-Law And Equity Pleading In Virginia, W. Hamilton Bryson
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reassessing Charitable Immunity In Virginia, Carl Tobias
Reassessing Charitable Immunity In Virginia, Carl Tobias
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Practice And Procedure, John R. Walk, Michael R. Spitzer Ii
Civil Practice And Procedure, John R. Walk, Michael R. Spitzer Ii
University of Richmond Law Review
This article will summarize recent developments of interest to practitioners handling civil cases in the courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Specifically included are relevant decisions of the Supreme Court of Virginia dating from opinions announced on June 10, 2004 to those announced on April 22, 2005; changes to the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia announced during the same time period; and legislation enacted by the Virginia General Assembly at its 2005 Session, effective July 1, 2005.
Civil Practice And Procedure, John R. Walk
Civil Practice And Procedure, John R. Walk
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Procedure By Contract: A Convoluted Confluence Of Private Contract And Public Procedure In Need Of Congressional Control, David H. Taylor, Sara M. Cliffe
Civil Procedure By Contract: A Convoluted Confluence Of Private Contract And Public Procedure In Need Of Congressional Control, David H. Taylor, Sara M. Cliffe
University of Richmond Law Review
There is great appeal to the notion that parties to a contract may provide in their agreement for how certain aspects of any dispute that may subsequently arise will be resolved. The appeal is so great, in fact, that both parties and courts have embraced the use and enforcement of pre-litigation agreements ("PLAs"). These agreements take a variety of forms. Parties may agree to the forum in which their dispute will be resolved. They may designate the law that will be applied to the resolution of the dispute. Parties may designate what evidence may or may not be presented as …
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Practice And Procedure, John L. Marshall Jr.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Practice And Procedure, John L. Marshall Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
This article focuses on some of the recent developments in civil litigation from June 1, 1998 to May 30, 1999, that have been effected by the Virginia General Assembly and the Supreme Court of Virginia. Each numbered discussion section is organized by topic in alphabetical order. This article highlights legislation of general interest to civil practitioners and does not purport to be all inclusive. This article does not address criminal procedure.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Casting The Net: Another Confusing Analysis Of Personal Jurisdiction And Internet Contacts In Telco Communications V. An Apple A Day, Donnie L. Kidd Jr.
Casting The Net: Another Confusing Analysis Of Personal Jurisdiction And Internet Contacts In Telco Communications V. An Apple A Day, Donnie L. Kidd Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
The fascination of the Internet and "cyberspace" is its sense of boundlessness. A user seemingly can go anywhere, be anyone, and do anything in a virtual world of information and interactivity. Actions on-line, however, often may have real world ramifications. The demarcation line between the physical and cyberspace "worlds" is not so pronounced that actions occurring in one have no effect in the other.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Practice And Procedure, George J. Dancigers, Patrick M. Mayette
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Practice And Procedure, George J. Dancigers, Patrick M. Mayette
University of Richmond Law Review
This article reviews some of the recent developments and changes effected by the Supreme Court of Virginia and the Virginia General Assembly which affect and involve civil litigation. The scope of this paper does not extend to criminal procedure. This paper is not intended to be an all inclusive compilation, but rather a sampling of case law and legislative enactments of interest to the civil litigation attorney.
The Innocent Owner Defense To Civil Forfeiture Proceedings, Peter David Houtz
The Innocent Owner Defense To Civil Forfeiture Proceedings, Peter David Houtz
University of Richmond Law Review
The Constitution of the United States prohibits the deprivation of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." The Constitution also expressly states that private property may not be "taken" by the government without "just compensation." Seizures and forfeitures of personal and real property without notification or hearing and without compensation have, however, become a powerful tool used by the government to deter crime.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Practice And Procedure, David D. Hopper
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Practice And Procedure, David D. Hopper
University of Richmond Law Review
Virginia courts and the General Assembly have effected several changes in civil practice and procedure during the past year. This article focuses on some significant developments and interests to the general litigation attorney.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Practice And Procedure, David D. Hopper
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Practice And Procedure, David D. Hopper
University of Richmond Law Review
Virginia courts and the General Assembly have effected a number of changes in civil practice and procedure during the past year. This article focuses on some significant developments of interest to the general litigation attorney. Matters affecting real property and juvenile and domestic relations are treated elsewhere in this volume.
Clinging To History: The Supreme Court (Mis)Interprets Federal Rule Of Evidence 801(D)(1)(B) As Containing A Temporal Requirement, Christopher A. Jones
Clinging To History: The Supreme Court (Mis)Interprets Federal Rule Of Evidence 801(D)(1)(B) As Containing A Temporal Requirement, Christopher A. Jones
University of Richmond Law Review
The adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence (the Rules) resulted in a more liberal standard for the admission and use of various forms of evidence. For example, the Rules altered the definition of "relevant evidence" increasing the scope of evidence that can be presented to a jury. Also, the Rules per- mit prior inconsistent statements to be admitted as substantive evidence rather than for impeachment purposes only. The Advisory Committee enunciated these changes, and other changes resulting from the adoption of the Rules, in their notes accompanying the Rules.
Lesnick V. Hollingsworth & Vose Co. - The Pure Stream Of Commerce No Longer Flows Through The Fourth Circuit, Lori Elizabeth Jones
Lesnick V. Hollingsworth & Vose Co. - The Pure Stream Of Commerce No Longer Flows Through The Fourth Circuit, Lori Elizabeth Jones
University of Richmond Law Review
Personal jurisdiction over nonresidents in a forum state has been problematic in our federal system for quite some time. Today, in order to establish personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant, the nonresident must have minimum contacts with the forum state. While the test may be stated succinctly, determining whether a person or corporation has minimum contacts with the forum state is an extremely complex process, as seen in the line of personal jurisdiction cases following International Shoe Co. v. Washington.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Practice And Procedure, Donald P. Boyle Jr.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Practice And Procedure, Donald P. Boyle Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
In Burroughs v. Palumbo, defendant was served with process through the Secretary of the Commonwealth. The grounds of defense was due to be filed on September 22, 1994. On September 29, 1994, defendant filed the notice of removal in federal court. On September 30, 1994, the state court entered default judgment against defendant. Later that same day, defendant filed the notice of removal with the state court. Between the time that defendant filed the notice of removal in federal court and the time that he filed it with the state court, both courts had jurisdiction over the case; therefore the …