Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Civil procedure (4)
- Litigation (4)
- United States Supreme Court (4)
- Alternative dispute resolution (3)
- California (3)
-
- Damages (3)
- Discovery (3)
- Punitive damages (3)
- Remedies (3)
- Sanctions (3)
- Business (2)
- Class actions (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Court congestion and delay (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Exemplary damages (2)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2)
- Federal courts (2)
- Legal ethics (2)
- Litigation costs (2)
- Negligence (2)
- Trial (2)
- Absolute immunity (1)
- Accident (1)
- Adequacy of representation (1)
- Administrative agency (1)
- Admissibility (1)
- Admissibility of evidence (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Agency theory (1)
Articles 31 - 34 of 34
Full-Text Articles in Law
Using Court-Annexed Arbitration To Reduce Litigant Costs And To Increase The Pace Of Litigation, John L. Barkai, Gene Kassebaum
Using Court-Annexed Arbitration To Reduce Litigant Costs And To Increase The Pace Of Litigation, John L. Barkai, Gene Kassebaum
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
States Escape Liability For Copyright Infringement?, Michelle V. Francis
States Escape Liability For Copyright Infringement?, Michelle V. Francis
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Restraints On The Doctrine Of Punitive Damages, Theodore B. Olson, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Constitutional Restraints On The Doctrine Of Punitive Damages, Theodore B. Olson, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Illusion Of Sacrifice: The Incompatibility Of Binding Stipulations In Cafa Cases , Ryan S. Killian
An Illusion Of Sacrifice: The Incompatibility Of Binding Stipulations In Cafa Cases , Ryan S. Killian
Pepperdine Law Review
Ever since the enactment of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), plaintiffs attorneys have sought to circumvent it. Because class certification is more difficult to obtain in federal court than it is in certain state courts, plaintiffs typically prefer to litigate in state court. One method of avoiding CAFA’s removal provision is to limit damages to less than $5 million, thus rendering the action too small to be subjected to the statute. And plaintiffs attorneys have proven willing to stipulate to such diminished damages even where the action is far more valuable. This Note examines whether such stipulations …