Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- BLR (10)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- SelectedWorks (3)
- Singapore Management University (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
-
- Selected Works (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- University of South Carolina (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (9)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (3)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (2)
- Publications (2)
- Strategies in Western Water Law and Policy: Courts, Coercion and Collaboration (Summer Conference, June 8-11) (2)
-
- William & Mary Business Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Publications (1)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles (1)
- Benjamin Miller (1)
- Brian Farkas (1)
- Charles W. Murdock (1)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Georgia State University Law Review (1)
- Hillary A Henderson (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Miguel Martínez (1)
- Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30) (1)
- William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 39 of 39
Full-Text Articles in Law
The "Duty" To Be A Rational Shareholder, David A. Hoffman
The "Duty" To Be A Rational Shareholder, David A. Hoffman
ExpressO
How and when do courts determine that corporate disclosures are actionable under the federal securities laws? The applicable standard is materiality: would a (mythical) "reasonable investor" have considered the disclosures important. As I establish through empirical and statistical testing of 500 cases analyzing the materiality standard, judicial findings of immateriality are remarkably common, and have been stable over time. Materiality's scope results in the dismissal of a large number of claims, and creates a set of cases in which courts attempt to explain and defend their vision of who is, and is not, a "reasonable investor." Thus, materiality provides an …
Valuation Averaging: A New Procedure For Resolving Valuation Disputes, Keith Sharfman
Valuation Averaging: A New Procedure For Resolving Valuation Disputes, Keith Sharfman
Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers
In this Article, Professor Sharfman addresses the problem of "discretionary valuation": that courts resolve valuation disputes arbitrarily and unpredictably, thus harming litigants and society. As a solution, he proposes the enactment of "valuation averaging," a new procedure for resolving valuation disputes modeled on the algorithmic valuation processes often agreed to by sophisticated private firms in advance of any dispute. He argues that by replacing the discretion of judges and juries with a mechanical valuation process, valuation averaging would cause litigants to introduce more plausible and conciliatory valuations into evidence and thereby reduce the cost of valuation litigation and increase the …
The Overwhelming Case For Elimination Of The Integration Doctrine Under The Securities Act Of 1933, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
The Overwhelming Case For Elimination Of The Integration Doctrine Under The Securities Act Of 1933, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
The thesis of this Article is that the Securities and Exchange Commission should entirely eliminate the integration doctrine from the Securities Act of1933. Under the integration doctrine, a single "offering" or "issue" of securities cannot be split. The doctrine is expensive for society and furthers no valid policy of the 1933 Act. More specifically, the doctrine does not promote investor protection but does retard capital formation, an outcome that is contrary to the presently articulated purposes of the 1933 Act.
Part II of this Article traces the history of the adoption of the integration doctrine both by the Commission and …
Basin-Wide Adjudications In The West: What Works, What Doesn’T?, Ramsey L. Kropf
Basin-Wide Adjudications In The West: What Works, What Doesn’T?, Ramsey L. Kropf
Strategies in Western Water Law and Policy: Courts, Coercion and Collaboration (Summer Conference, June 8-11)
18 pages.
Contains 2 pages of references.
Agenda: Strategies In Western Water Law And Policy: Courts, Coercion And Collaboration, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, University Of Colorado Boulder. Center Of The American West
Agenda: Strategies In Western Water Law And Policy: Courts, Coercion And Collaboration, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, University Of Colorado Boulder. Center Of The American West
Strategies in Western Water Law and Policy: Courts, Coercion and Collaboration (Summer Conference, June 8-11)
1 v. (various pagings) : ill., maps, charts ; 29 cm
Conference organizers, session moderators and/or speakers included University of Colorado School of Law professors Gary C. Bryner, James N. Corbridge, Jr., David H. Getches, Douglas S. Kenney, Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Kathryn M. Mutz and Charles F. Wilkinson
Includes bibliographical references
The event will examine the principal problem-solving strategies in western water law and policy: courts, coercion and collaboration. In addressing this broad range of strategies, the program will focus on national, west-wide and Colorado-specific issues.
Conference activities will commence with a free public program cosponsored by the Center of …
A Positive Analysis Of The Common Law Of Corporate Fiduciary Duties, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
A Positive Analysis Of The Common Law Of Corporate Fiduciary Duties, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
The purpose of this Article is to offer a positive analysis of the common law of corporate managers' fiduciary duties. The Article attempts to explain the present shape of these corporate fiduciary duties by reference to Pareto criteria.
A particular state of affairs ("state B") is considered to be Pareto superior to another state of affairs ("state A") if at least one person in state B is better off than he or she is in state A and no one in state B is worse off than he or she is in state A. Since in a move from state …
The Utah Wilderness Debate (Or Is That Debacle), Jeffrey W. Appel
The Utah Wilderness Debate (Or Is That Debacle), Jeffrey W. Appel
Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)
95 pages (includes illustrations and maps).
Ancillary Relief In Federal Securities Law: A Study In Federal Remedies, George W. Dent
Ancillary Relief In Federal Securities Law: A Study In Federal Remedies, George W. Dent
Faculty Publications
After describing the history and current practice of ancillary relief in federal securities law, this Article analyzes the general law of federal remedies and ancillary relief, including ancillary relief in other areas of administrative law, recent developments in federal equity, statutory interpretation, and federal common law, and implied statutory remedies. The Article then examines pertinent aspects of the federal securities laws, including their legislative history and recent judicial interpretations. On this basis the Article recommends both a general approach to ancillary relief in federal securities law and responses to problems of specific remedies. Finally, the Article discusses ancillary relief under …
Removal Of The Corporate Director During His Term Of Office, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
Removal Of The Corporate Director During His Term Of Office, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
Publications
The traditional rules governing the removal of corporate directors have evolved so as to insulate the board of directors from the shareholders who elect them. Professor Travers in his article examines initially the interests being advanced by protecting the board members from removal by their electorate. He then critically analyzes the law as it relates to these interests in order to suggest a more rational approach.