Law Commons^™

Safety First: The Deceptive Allure Of Full Reserve Banking, Morgan Ricks

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

In Safe Banking, Professor Adam Levitin joins a venerable tradition in the money and banking literature. That tradition, called full reserve banking, has claimed a number of illustrious supporters over the years, including Professors Irving Fisher, Henry Simons, and Milton Friedman. The basic idea of full re­serve banking is seductive in its simplicity: "banks" should own nothing but physical cash. Because a full reserve bank has no in­vestments, it can suffer no investment losses. A run on such a bank would be harmless, because the bank would never fail to meet redemptions (barring any loss or theft of cash). The …

The Protection Of Deposits And Depositors: A Limited Interpretation Of 12 U.S.C. § 1833a, Alyssa King

Catholic University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Perceptions Of The Future Of Bank Merger Antitrust: Local Areas Will Remain Relevant Markets, Gregory J. Werden

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

No abstract provided.

Regulatory Theory And Deposit Insurance Reform, R. Mark Williamson

Cleveland State Law Review

The purpose of this article, however, is not to summarize the maze of federal and state banking regulation. Instead, recognizing that deposit insurance is a centerpiece of the overall regulatory scheme to which any financial institution in the United States is subject, this article is primarily concerned with subjecting this form of bank regulation to analysis based upon general principles of regulatory theory. This article is less concerned with the details of banking law than it is with using regulatory to shape policy guidelines for the coming process of deposit insurance reform.

Regulatory Theory And Deposit Insurance Reform, R. Mark Williamson

Cleveland State Law Review

The purpose of this article, however, is not to summarize the maze of federal and state banking regulation. Instead, recognizing that deposit insurance is a centerpiece of the overall regulatory scheme to which any financial institution in the United States is subject, this article is primarily concerned with subjecting this form of bank regulation to analysis based upon general principles of regulatory theory. This article is less concerned with the details of banking law than it is with using regulatory to shape policy guidelines for the coming process of deposit insurance reform.

Nondeposit Deposits And The Future Of Bank Regulation, Jonathan R. Macey, Geoffrey P. Miller

Michigan Law Review

We argue in this paper that the nation has already entered with a vengeance into the era of nondeposit deposit banking. The traditional bank deposit against which reserves must be held and deposit insurance paid is suffering encroachment from a wide variety of competitive instruments and arrangements, all of which, to one degree or another - often to a substantial degree - serve a function economically similar to that of the checking account at a depository institution.

The legal system may respond to these developments by attempting to bring nondeposit deposits under regulation, as it has done with other banking …

Rights And Duties Of A Bank In The Application Of A Deposit To The Payment Of A Depositor's Obligation, Mary Garner Borden

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Banks And Banking - Immunity Of National Banks From State Escheat Statute, Spencer E. Irons

Michigan Law Review

A Michigan statute provided that bank deposits, in the possession or control of insolvent banks, which have remained inactive for a period of seven years or more shall escheat to the state. In a suit for a declaratory judgment, filed by the Attorney General of Michigan, against the receiver of an insolvent national bank and the Comptroller of the Currency of the United States, the federal district court held that the receiver must turn over deposits coming within the terms of the statute. Held, the statute is invalid if so applied, since it would constitute an unlawful interference with …

Principal And Surety - Duty Of Obligee To Disclose To Surety - Surety's Right Of Subrogation, Julian Caplan

Michigan Law Review

Surety defended an action on the bond of the town treasurer on the ground that at the time the bond was entered into the treasurer, in violation of statute, had deposited in a local bank an amount exceeding thirty per cent of the total deposits of the bank and that the town selectmen, although well aware of the situation, failed to disclose the facts to the surety. Plaintiff contended that there was no duty to disclose these facts to the surety, especially since the treasurer's annual report showed that the amount of the deposits exceeded the legal limit. As an …