Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (20)
- Intellectual Property Law (15)
- Criminal Law (10)
- International Trade Law (10)
- Constitutional Law (9)
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (8)
- First Amendment (8)
- Medical Jurisprudence (8)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (6)
- Courts (6)
- Human Rights Law (6)
- Bankruptcy Law (5)
- Civil Law (5)
- Evidence (5)
- Health Law and Policy (5)
- Property Law and Real Estate (5)
- Torts (5)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Business Organizations Law (4)
- Commercial Law (4)
- Conflict of Laws (4)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (4)
- Insurance Law (4)
- Internet Law (4)
- Legal Education (4)
- Science and Technology Law (4)
- Transnational Law (4)
- Contracts (3)
- International Humanitarian Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- International law (12)
- Medical malpractice (8)
- Copyright (6)
- World Trade Organization (5)
- Federalism (4)
-
- Intellectual property (4)
- Property rights (4)
- Arbitration (3)
- Conflict of laws (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Due process (3)
- Human rights (3)
- Insurance companies (3)
- International trade (3)
- Piracy (3)
- Privacy (3)
- Regulation (3)
- Tort law (3)
- Anchoring (2)
- Antitrust (2)
- Class actions (2)
- Corporate law (2)
- Crime (2)
- Criminal law (2)
- DNA (2)
- Decision making (2)
- Dispute resolution (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Foreign investment (2)
- Free speech (2)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 151 - 157 of 157
Full-Text Articles in Law
Patients And Biobanks, Ellen Wright Clayton
Patients And Biobanks, Ellen Wright Clayton
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The question about the privacy of medical information can be stated simply: To what extent can and should patients control what the medical record contains and who has access to it and for what purposes? Patients often have apparently conflicting views on this subject. On the one hand, we, as patients, say that we prize privacy and that we fear that information will be used to harm us. On the other hand, we value the benefits that come from improved communication among providers, such as having our visits covered by third party payers and advances in medical science, which often …
Behavioral Genetics And Crime, In Context, Owen D. Jones
Behavioral Genetics And Crime, In Context, Owen D. Jones
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This Article provides an introduction to some of the key issues at the intersection of behavioral genetics and crime.
It provides, among other things, an overview of the emerging points of consensus, scientifically, on what behavioral genetics can and cannot tell us about criminal behavior. It also discusses a variety of important implications (as well as complexities) of attempting to use insights of behavioral genetics in legal contexts.
Reconceptualizing Due Process In Juvenile Justice: Contributions From Law And Social Science, Christopher Slobogin, Mark R. Fondacaro, Tricia Cross
Reconceptualizing Due Process In Juvenile Justice: Contributions From Law And Social Science, Christopher Slobogin, Mark R. Fondacaro, Tricia Cross
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This article challenges the accepted wisdom, at least since the Supreme Court's decision in Gault, that procedures in juvenile delinquency court should mimic the adult criminal process. The legal basis for this challenge is Gault itself, as well as the other Supreme Court cases that triggered the juvenile justice revolution of the past decades, for all of these cases relied on the due process clause, not the provisions of the Constitution that form the foundation for adult criminal procedure. That means that the central goal in juvenile justice is fundamental fairness, which does not have to be congruent with the …
Reasonableness Review After Booker, Nancy J. King
Reasonableness Review After Booker, Nancy J. King
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
About a year ago, the Supreme Court in United States v. Booker declared a new standard for the appellate review of federal sentences-reasonableness. Justice Breyer, writing for the Court, asserted reassuringly that the reasonableness standard is not really new at all because judges had been applying it for years to review sentences for crimes lacking specific guidelines, sentences imposed after probation revocation, and, at least until 2003, sentences based upon departures from the recommended guideline range. Like most new legal standards that take shape case-by-case through the appellate process, reasonableness review is developing incrementally, creeping more clearly into view with …
A Cognitive Theory Of Trust, Erin O'Connor
A Cognitive Theory Of Trust, Erin O'Connor
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Interpersonal trust is currently receiving widespread attention in the academy. Many legal scholars incorrectly assume that interpersonal trust is an unmitigated good (or bad) and that legal policy should therefore be crafted to maximize (or minimize) trust. A more nuanced understanding of trust indicates instead that it should be promoted or discouraged, depending on the context. Such an understanding needs to reflect the fact that trust and distrust can, and often do, coexist. In most relationships, the parties trust one another with regard to some matters and yet distrust one another with regard to other matters. More specifically, developing a …
Skin-Tone Effects Among African Americans: Perceptions And Reality, Joni Hersch
Skin-Tone Effects Among African Americans: Perceptions And Reality, Joni Hersch
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
It is commonly assumed that lighter skinned African Americans receive preferential treatment over darker skinned counterparts. Using individual data from three sources, this paper examines the influence of skin tone on education and on wages. Lighter skin tone has a consistent positive impact on educational attainment but has a less consistent influence on wages. Possible mechanisms by which skin tone differences might influence economic outcomes are investigated, including measurement error, perceived attractiveness, access to integrated schools or work groups, perceived discrimination, and genetic differences. The perception that there is differential treatment on the basis of skin tone is more pronounced …
Honing A Blunt Instrument: Refining The Use Of Judicial Estoppel In Bankruptcy Nondisclosure Cases, Robert F. Dugas
Honing A Blunt Instrument: Refining The Use Of Judicial Estoppel In Bankruptcy Nondisclosure Cases, Robert F. Dugas
Vanderbilt Law Review
For individuals and organizations facing financial distress, modern bankruptcy law provides a statutory respite from creditors and mounting debt. When a debtor's liabilities irretrievably exceed its available assets, the law provides a forum for interested parties to efficiently assess and equitably divide or restructure a maximized pie of debtor value. What happens, however, when an individual or corporate debtor, either through fraud or mistake, "hides" a piece of the pie?