Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Engineering
Predictive Models For Concrete Cone Capacity Of Cast-In Headed Anchors In Geopolymer Concrete, Trijon Karmokar, Alireza Mohyeddin, Jessey Lee
Predictive Models For Concrete Cone Capacity Of Cast-In Headed Anchors In Geopolymer Concrete, Trijon Karmokar, Alireza Mohyeddin, Jessey Lee
Research outputs 2022 to 2026
The scope of current state-of-the-art prediction models for concrete cone capacity of cast-in headed anchors is limited to normal concrete. In this study, the difference in the tensile performance of cast-in headed anchors embedded in ambient-temperature cured fly ash-based geopolymer concrete and normal concrete is investigated using both experimental and numerical analysis. The concrete cone capacity obtained for anchors investigated in this study is compared with current prediction models namely: Concrete Capacity Design (CCD) model, which overestimated the results by a maximum of 41%, and Linear Fracture Mechanics (LFM), which underestimated the results by a maximum of 53%. Anchors of …
Influence Of Surface Cracking, Anchor Head Profile, And Anchor Head Size On Cast-In Headed Anchors In Geopolymer Concrete, Trijon Karmokar, Alireza Moyheddin
Influence Of Surface Cracking, Anchor Head Profile, And Anchor Head Size On Cast-In Headed Anchors In Geopolymer Concrete, Trijon Karmokar, Alireza Moyheddin
Research outputs 2022 to 2026
In this study, the concrete cone capacity, concrete cone angle, and load–displacement response of cast-in headed anchors in geopolymer concrete are explored using numerical analyses. The concrete damaged plasticity (CDP) model in ABAQUS is used to simulate the behavior of concrete substrates. The tensile behavior of anchors in geopolymer concrete is compared with that in normal concrete as well as that predicted by the linear fracture mechanics (LFM) and concrete capacity design (CCD) models. The results show that the capacity of the anchors in geopolymer concrete is 30%–40% lower than that in normal concrete. The results also indicate that the …