Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- & abusive acts (1)
- Anti-competitive harm (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Competition policy (1)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (1)
-
- Consumer protection (1)
- Credit cards (1)
- Debit cards (1)
- Deceptive (1)
- Diplomacy (1)
- Global institutions (1)
- Glocal (1)
- Market structure (1)
- Merchant claims (1)
- Network & bank interchange fees (1)
- Ohio v. American Express (1)
- Smart cities (1)
- State and local (1)
- Two-sided markets (1)
- UDAAP (1)
- Unfair (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Other Business
Global To Local: Creating 'Glocal' Links For Diplomacy, Rhonda S. Binda
Global To Local: Creating 'Glocal' Links For Diplomacy, Rhonda S. Binda
Open Educational Resources
Over the past few years, “smart cities” have led in leveraging technology to modernize their services and infrastructure— and have emerged on the global stage on key issues of international concern. In 2017, Hidalgo and Horacio Rodríguez Larreta, Mayor of Buenos Aires, spearheaded the Urban 20 (U20), a platform for major cities in G20 countries to bring their “urban perspective” to the G20 member states in tackling common problems, showcasing their innovative approaches leveraging emerging technologies at the local level to tackle global issues. In April 2018, mayors from 20 cities signed the U20’s first Joint Declaration; six months later, …
What’S In Your Wallet (And What Should The Law Do About It?), Natasha Sarin
What’S In Your Wallet (And What Should The Law Do About It?), Natasha Sarin
All Faculty Scholarship
In traditional markets, firms can charge prices that are significantly elevated relative to their costs only if there is a market failure. However, this is not true in a two-sided market (like Amazon, Uber, and Mastercard), where firms often subsidize one side of the market and generate revenue from the other. This means consideration of one side of the market in isolation is problematic. The Court embraced this view in Ohio v. American Express, requiring that anticompetitive harm on one side of a two-sided market be weighed against benefits on the other side.
Legal scholars denounce this decision, which, …