Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Finance and Financial Management Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (15)
- Economics (13)
- Accounting (12)
- Business Administration, Management, and Operations (12)
- Corporate Finance (11)
-
- Insurance (10)
- Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods (9)
- Portfolio and Security Analysis (3)
- Agribusiness (2)
- Agricultural Economics (2)
- Agricultural Science (2)
- Agriculture (2)
- Agronomy and Crop Sciences (2)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (2)
- Environmental Sciences (2)
- Finance (2)
- Life Sciences (2)
- Organizational Behavior and Theory (2)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (2)
- Plant Sciences (2)
- Agricultural Education (1)
- Alternative and Complementary Medicine (1)
- Asian Studies (1)
- Economic Theory (1)
- Education (1)
- Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment (1)
- Environmental Monitoring (1)
- Government Contracts (1)
- Institution
-
- Brigham Young University (15)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (9)
- Southern University and A&M College (7)
- Air Force Institute of Technology (4)
- Singapore Management University (4)
-
- Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (3)
- Rollins College (3)
- Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia (2)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (1)
- DePaul University (1)
- Edith Cowan University (1)
- Fordham University (1)
- Indiana State University (1)
- Kennesaw State University (1)
- Louisiana Tech University (1)
- Marquette University (1)
- Morehead State University (1)
- Old Dominion University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Southern Adventist University (1)
- University of South Carolina (1)
- Utah State University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Campus budget (7)
- Operating budget (7)
- Finance (4)
- Johnson & Johnson (3)
- Pfizer (3)
-
- AT&T (2)
- American Express (2)
- Anheuser-Busch (2)
- Bristol-Myers (2)
- Citigroup (2)
- Delta (2)
- Farming (2)
- GTE (2)
- General Electric (2)
- Glaxo Wellcome (2)
- Intel (2)
- MCI WorldCom (2)
- Microsoft (2)
- Risk (2)
- Safeway (2)
- Securities (2)
- Sprint (2)
- Warner Lambert (2)
- Western Australia (2)
- ADC Telecommunications (1)
- Abbott (1)
- Abercrombie & Fitch (1)
- Acxiom (1)
- Affiliated Computer (1)
- Ahold (1)
- Publication
-
- Journal of Microfinance / ESR Review (11)
- Journal of Actuarial Practice (1993–2006) (9)
- All Southern University System Budgets (7)
- Faculty Publications (6)
- Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business (4)
-
- Crummer Truist Portfolios (3)
- IIMB Management Review (3)
- Theses and Dissertations (3)
- All Current Publications (1)
- Bulletins 4000 - (1)
- CRIF Working Paper series (1)
- Capstone Research Projects (1)
- College of Business Faculty and Staff Works (1)
- Doctoral Dissertations (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Working Papers and Articles (1)
- Farm Systems and Economics published reports (1)
- Finance Faculty Research and Publications (1)
- Financial Reports (1)
- Morehead State University Financial Summaries Archive (1)
- Publications and Research (1)
- Theses and Dissertations in Business Administration (1)
- Theses: Doctorates and Masters (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 61 of 61
Full-Text Articles in Finance and Financial Management
The Delisting Bias In Crsp’S Nasdaq Data And Its Implications For The Size Effect, Tyler Shumway, Vincent A. Warther
The Delisting Bias In Crsp’S Nasdaq Data And Its Implications For The Size Effect, Tyler Shumway, Vincent A. Warther
Faculty Publications
We investigate the bias in CRSP's Nasdaq data due to missing returns for delisted stocks. We find that the missing returns are large and negative on average, and that delisted stocks experience a substantial decrease in liquidity. We estimate that using a corrected return of −55 percent for missing performance-related delisting returns corrects the bias. We revisit previous work which finds a size effect among Nasdaq stocks. After correcting for the delisting bias, there is no evidence that there ever was a size effect on Nasdaq. Our results are inconsistent with most risk-based explanations of the size effect.