Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (23)
- Organizational Behavior and Theory (14)
- Labor Relations (12)
- Psychology (12)
- Industrial and Organizational Psychology (8)
-
- Social Psychology (6)
- Collective Bargaining (5)
- Unions (5)
- Human Resources Management (3)
- Law (3)
- Sociology (3)
- Work, Economy and Organizations (3)
- Arts and Humanities (2)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (2)
- History (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- Organization Development (2)
- Business Administration, Management, and Operations (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
- Child Psychology (1)
- Cognitive Psychology (1)
- Economics (1)
- International and Comparative Labor Relations (1)
- Labor Economics (1)
- Labor History (1)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (1)
- Operations and Supply Chain Management (1)
- Other History (1)
- Public Health (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 31 - 35 of 35
Full-Text Articles in Business
Sugar ‘N’ Spice And All Things Nice: Gender And Strategy Choices In Negotiation, Mara Olekalns, Carol Kulik
Sugar ‘N’ Spice And All Things Nice: Gender And Strategy Choices In Negotiation, Mara Olekalns, Carol Kulik
Mara Olekalns
In this chapter we examine how social stereotypes affect the perception of women who strive to improve their economic outcomes through negotiation. We discuss how gender affects negotiation process and outcomes by: (a) describing how men and women differ in their approach to negotiation (b) highlighting the social consequences for women who adopt a more competitive negotiation style; and (c) articulating the process by which counter-normative behaviour influences negotiation outcomes. Throughout this chapter, we describe the strategies that enable women to preserve ongoing organisational relationships and simultaneously improve their economic outcomes.
Competent And Likeable? Protecting And Promoting Women’S Likeability In Employment Negotiations, Mara Olekalns, Carol Kulik
Competent And Likeable? Protecting And Promoting Women’S Likeability In Employment Negotiations, Mara Olekalns, Carol Kulik
Mara Olekalns
Professional women earn less than their male counterparts and this salary gap largely results from the ways men and women negotiate employment terms. We integrate the Stereotype Content Model and Expectancy Violation Theory to explain why traditional “best practice” negotiation behaviors benefit male negotiators but backfire for female negotiators. Gender counter-normative behaviors create negative expectancy violations for women, generating cognitive and emotional backlash from their negotiation partners. We use this theoretical integration to identify alternative strategies that female employees and their employers can use to avoid negative expectancy violations and ensure that women are not disadvantaged in workplace negotiations.
Interest-Based Bargaining In Education, Sally Klingel
Interest-Based Bargaining In Education, Sally Klingel
Sally Klingel
[Excerpt] Despite almost 20 years of experience with a variety of alternative techniques in collective bargaining in education, there is no summary of the research on negotiation practices or survey of practice variations in use. The parties in negotiations have little to guide them in their investigation of the utility of what are commonly referred to as Interest-Based Bargaining (IBB) strategies. In order to give negotiators tools with which they can make choices appropriate to their needs based on current knowledge and practice, this report offers an informed discussion of the utility of various bargaining models. It provides: ◗ A …
Emotion In Negotiation: Introduction To Special Issue, Mara Olekalns, Dan Druckman
Emotion In Negotiation: Introduction To Special Issue, Mara Olekalns, Dan Druckman
Mara Olekalns
This paper is the introduction to a Special Issue of Group Decision and Negotiation, focusing on emotion in negotiation.
Loose With The Truth: Predicting Deception In Negotiation, Mara Olekalns, Philip Smith
Loose With The Truth: Predicting Deception In Negotiation, Mara Olekalns, Philip Smith
Mara Olekalns
Using a simulated, two-party negotiation, we examined how characteristics of the actor, target, and situation affected deception. To trigger deception, we used an issue that had no value for one of the two parties (indifference issue). We found support for an opportunistic betrayal model of deception: deception increased when the other party was perceived as benevolent, trustworthy and as having integrity. Negotiators’ goals also affected the use of deception. Individualistic, cooperative and mixed dyads responded differently to information about the other party’s trustworthiness, benevolence and integrity when deciding to either misrepresent or leverage their indifference issue. Mixed dyads displayed opportunistic …