Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Formal Systems in Polycontextural Constellations (3)
- Contextural Programming Paradigm (2)
- Logical Argument Mapping, Argument Visualization, and Argumentation Theory (2)
- Argumentation theory (1)
- Ars; lambda calculus; polycontexturality; programming; complexity (1)
-
- Claim substantiation (1)
- Darwin (1)
- Darwin and Darwinism (1)
- Diagrammatic Reasoning, Abduction, Semiotics, and Charles Peirce (1)
- Epistemology (1)
- Ethics and Conflicts (1)
- Evolution (1)
- Explanation (1)
- Fibonacci; GHC; HASKELL; SATIN; ConTeXtures; polycontexturality; interactionality; reflectionality; proemiality; polycontextural; Thomas Mahler; Rudolf Kaehr (1)
- Formalism (1)
- Gödel; Hehner; Gunther; reflectional; interactional; polylogics (1)
- Intelligent Design (1)
- Nobel prize (1)
- Paralegommena (1)
- Philosophy of social science (1)
- Rhetoric styles (1)
- Scientific development (1)
- Scientific prose (1)
- Sistemism (1)
- Sociological theory (1)
- Stan Prusiner (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Philosophy of Science
Vestiges, Mark Y. Herring
Vestiges, Mark Y. Herring
Dacus Library Faculty Publications
Can intelligent design be found?
Formalismo, Sistemismo Y Explicación, Jorge Gibert-Galassi
Formalismo, Sistemismo Y Explicación, Jorge Gibert-Galassi
jorge gibert-galassi
This essay discusses three axioms of sociopoietic theory from the point of view of philosophy of social science. The first axiom, its de-ontologised character, it is associated to theory formalism and it allows to question the validity of a factual theory that do not presuppose the reality. The second one, allow to discuss the pertinence of the social system concept adopted by the sociopoietic view. Finally, argue that a theory about something it is not possible without having an explanation about this "something", and it is asked how an epistemology of the event can acquired content excluding the radical determinism …
"I Knew There Was Something Wrong With That Paper": Scientific Rhetorical Styles And Scientific Misunderstandings, Carol Reeves
"I Knew There Was Something Wrong With That Paper": Scientific Rhetorical Styles And Scientific Misunderstandings, Carol Reeves
Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS
This selection unpacks scientific prose and claim substantiation for Nobel Prize winner, Stan Prusiner, in the transmissible spongiform encephlopathies field (i.e., mad cow disease). Applying linguistic strategies such as M. A. K. Halliday's "favorite clause type," the author examines argumentative strategies in dense scientific prose both in bold and cautious rhetorical styles and invented lexical changes in new scientific development.
Fibonacci In Contextures, An Application, Rudolf Kaehr
Fibonacci In Contextures, An Application, Rudolf Kaehr
Rudolf Kaehr
No abstract provided.
Contextures. Programming Dynamic Complexity, Rudolf Kaehr
Contextures. Programming Dynamic Complexity, Rudolf Kaehr
Rudolf Kaehr
No abstract provided.
Gödel Games: "Cloning Gödel's Proofs", Rudolf Kaehr
Gödel Games: "Cloning Gödel's Proofs", Rudolf Kaehr
Rudolf Kaehr
Gödel's Proofs in the context of beautifying (Hehner) and re-beautifying in polycontextural logic. Deconstruction of the relevance.
Lambda Calculi In Polycontextural Situations, Rudolf Kaehr
Lambda Calculi In Polycontextural Situations, Rudolf Kaehr
Rudolf Kaehr
No abstract provided.
Polylogics. Towards A Formalization Of Polycontextural Logics, Rudolf Kaehr
Polylogics. Towards A Formalization Of Polycontextural Logics, Rudolf Kaehr
Rudolf Kaehr
No abstract provided.
Limits Of Truth: Exploring Epistemological Approaches To Argumentation, Michael H.G. Hoffmann
Limits Of Truth: Exploring Epistemological Approaches To Argumentation, Michael H.G. Hoffmann
Michael H.G. Hoffmann
Some proponents of epistemological approaches to argumentation (Biro, Siegel, Lumer, Goldman) assume that it should be possible to develop non-relative criteria of argument evaluation. By contrast, this paper argues that any evaluation of an argument depends (a) on the cognitive situation of the evaluator, (b) on background knowledge that is available for this evaluator in a certain situation, and (c)—in some cases—on the belief-value-system this person shares.
Logical Argument Mapping: A Method For Overcoming Cognitive Problems Of Conflict Management, Michael H.G. Hoffmann
Logical Argument Mapping: A Method For Overcoming Cognitive Problems Of Conflict Management, Michael H.G. Hoffmann
Michael H.G. Hoffmann
A crucial problem of conflict management is that whatever happens in negotiations will be interpreted and framed by stakeholders based on their different belief-value systems and world views. This problem will be discussed in the first part of this article as the main cognitive problem of conflict management. The second part develops a general semiotic solution of this problem, based on Charles Peirce's concept of "diagrammatic reasoning." The basic idea is that by representing one 's thought in diagrams, the conditions that determine interpretations can become visible, we can "experiment" with them, and we can change them eventually. The third …
What You Should Know To Survive In Knowledge Societies. On A Semiotic Understanding Of 'Knowledge', Michael H.G. Hoffmann
What You Should Know To Survive In Knowledge Societies. On A Semiotic Understanding Of 'Knowledge', Michael H.G. Hoffmann
Michael H.G. Hoffmann
Different situations - like school and workplace - demand different forms of knowledge. Even more important, in particular for lifelong learning, are forms of knowledge we need for managing movements between those situations. To develop a better understanding of how to 'navigate' knowledge boundaries, this paper analyzes, firstly, interviews with scientists interpreting familiar and unfamiliar graphs. Our goal is to identify those forms of knowledge that should receive special attention in education. Secondly, the article elaborates - based on Peirce's semiotic - an epistemologically reflected semiotic model to describe the role and conditions of knowledge.
Darwinisms’S Multiple Ontologies, David J. Depew