Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Applied Ethics (1)
- Classical Literature and Philology (1)
- Classics (1)
- Cognitive Psychology (1)
- Community Psychology (1)
-
- Counseling Psychology (1)
- English Language and Literature (1)
- Environmental Studies (1)
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (1)
- Health Psychology (1)
- History (1)
- Human Ecology (1)
- Law (1)
- Law and Philosophy (1)
- Literature in English, North America, Ethnic and Cultural Minority (1)
- Medieval History (1)
- Metaphysics (1)
- Other Classics (1)
- Other Law (1)
- Other Philosophy (1)
- Philosophy of Mind (1)
- Philosophy of Science (1)
- Place and Environment (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Sociology (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in History of Philosophy
Medieval Thinking In The 21st Century: Crystal Balls, Black Swans, And Darwin's Finches In The Time Of Corona, George Conesa
Medieval Thinking In The 21st Century: Crystal Balls, Black Swans, And Darwin's Finches In The Time Of Corona, George Conesa
The International Journal of Ecopsychology (IJE)
Twenty years into the 21st Century, a sizable swath of the world populace thinks, makes decisions, and defines itself in a conflicted and contradictory chimera. Millions of individuals make use of cutting-edge technologies while simultaneously throwing salt over their shoulders and consulting with the local ‘healer’ about any number of illnesses--to caricaturize, a sort of medieval-thinker-tech-savvy orientation. It is here affirmed that the practical consequences of this agentic amalgamation, modes of thinking, and “being in the world” are counterproductive at best and self-defeating at worst, resulting in much uncertainty and leading to, for example, mixed messages in public health …
The Reliable Revisionist, Caitlyn Schaffer
The Reliable Revisionist, Caitlyn Schaffer
Philosophy: Student Scholarship & Creative Works
The present text explores how the topic of head and heart is much more complicated than one would expect, according to Paul Henne and Walter Sinnot-Armstrong, contributors of Neuroexistentialism. “Does Neuroscience Undermine Morality” aims at figuring out the problem of which moral judgments we can trust, judgments from one’s head (revisionism) or judgments from one’s heart (conservatism). My hypothesis suggests the opposite of the authors, I believe that if you are a revisionist, your first order intuitions are reliable. After setting the framework, I make three main arguments. (A.) If you are able to self-correct then you can identify errors …