Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Agency (1)
- Ambiguity (1)
- Augustana College (1)
- Autonomy (1)
- Clear and distinct ideas (1)
-
- Consciousness (1)
- Consequences (1)
- Conservatives (1)
- Deconstruction (1)
- Deleuze (1)
- Derrida (1)
- Desecrates (1)
- Différance. (1)
- Emotion (1)
- Good judgement (1)
- Gregg Caruso (1)
- Higher order principles (1)
- Human characteristics (1)
- Human dignity (1)
- Love (1)
- Meaning (1)
- Moral judgements (1)
- Morality (1)
- Morals (1)
- Neuroexistentialism (1)
- Neuroscience (1)
- Nozick (1)
- OEUR (1)
- Order effects undermine reliability (1)
- Owen Flanagan (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in History of Philosophy
A Deleuzean Poststructural Deconstruction, Adam Nadir Mohamed
A Deleuzean Poststructural Deconstruction, Adam Nadir Mohamed
Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository
This project seeks to reconceive a poststructural form of deconstructive criticism as a Deleuzean deconstructive commentary. I first explore the way Derrida’s concept of différance is confined to a deconstructive criticism which solely traces it in order to critique metaphysical concepts. As an alternative to the confined use of différance in deconstructive criticism, I develop a deconstructive commentary which deconstructs the primacy of a commentated text. Instead of using différance solely to trace the limitations of philosophical concepts (Hegelian in particular), it can serve as a plane of immanence that track a multitude of differently configured philosophical concepts in their …
The Reliable Revisionist, Caitlyn Schaffer
The Reliable Revisionist, Caitlyn Schaffer
Philosophy: Student Scholarship & Creative Works
The present text explores how the topic of head and heart is much more complicated than one would expect, according to Paul Henne and Walter Sinnot-Armstrong, contributors of Neuroexistentialism. “Does Neuroscience Undermine Morality” aims at figuring out the problem of which moral judgments we can trust, judgments from one’s head (revisionism) or judgments from one’s heart (conservatism). My hypothesis suggests the opposite of the authors, I believe that if you are a revisionist, your first order intuitions are reliable. After setting the framework, I make three main arguments. (A.) If you are able to self-correct then you can identify errors …