Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Alasdair MacIntyre (1)
- Andrew Ross (1)
- Aristotle (1)
- Cold war (1)
- Continental philosophy of science (1)
-
- Fleck (1)
- Gombrich (1)
- History of the Cold War (1)
- Incommensurability (1)
- James Conant (1)
- Kuhn (1)
- Ludwik Fleck (1)
- Mannheim (1)
- McCarthyism (1)
- Patrick A. Heelan (1)
- Robert Merton (1)
- Social Studies of Science (1)
- Steven Weinberg (1)
- Style (1)
- Thomas Kuhn (1)
- Thomas Schnelle (1)
- Translation (1)
- Wilhelm Baldamus (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Philosophy
From Fleck’S Denkstil To Kuhn’S Paradigm: Conceptual Schemes And Incommensurability, Babette Babich
From Fleck’S Denkstil To Kuhn’S Paradigm: Conceptual Schemes And Incommensurability, Babette Babich
Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Collections
This article argues that the limited influence of Ludwik Fleck’s ideas on philosophy of science is due not only to their indirect dissemination by way of Thomas Kuhn, but also to an incommensurability between the standard conceptual framework of history and philosophy of science and Fleck’s own more integratedly historico-social and praxis-oriented approach to understanding the evolution of scientific discovery. What Kuhn named “paradigm” offers a periphrastic rendering or oblique translation of Fleck’s Denkstil/Denkkollektiv, a derivation that may also account for the lability of the term “paradigm”. This was due not to Kuhn’s unwillingness to credit Fleck but rather to …
Kuhn's Paradigm As A Parable For The Cold War: Incommensurability And Its Discontents From Fuller's Tale Of Harvard To Fleck's Unsung Lvov, Babette Babich
Kuhn's Paradigm As A Parable For The Cold War: Incommensurability And Its Discontents From Fuller's Tale Of Harvard To Fleck's Unsung Lvov, Babette Babich
Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Collections
In a journal issue dedicated to a discussion of Steve Fuller's Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times, I argue that Kuhn’s limited acknowledgment of Fleck’s influence on his The Structure of Scientific Revolutions was due to a foundational incommensurability between the standard conceptual framework for philosophical studies of science and Fleck’s historico-social and praxis-oriented approach to scientific progress. The incommensurability in question constituted an insurmountable tension between the kind of language and thinking manifest in Fleck’s study and the conceptual language evident in Kuhn and characteristic of one might still call the received view’ in philosophy of science. …