Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Direct democracy (2)
- Alexander v. Sandoval (1)
- Alien Tort Claims Act (1)
- Cultural imperialism (1)
- Cultural relativism (1)
-
- Democratic virtues (1)
- Direct democratic processes (1)
- Domestic enforcement (1)
- Filartiga v. Pena-Irala (1)
- Human rights (1)
- International law (1)
- Michael Ignatieff (1)
- Plebiscites (1)
- Popular will (1)
- Populism (1)
- Public character (1)
- Referenda and initiatives (1)
- Responsibility-taking (1)
- Supremacy Clause (1)
- The Paquete Habana (1)
- U.S. v. Alvarez-Machain (1)
- Universalism (1)
- Virtue ethics (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Philosophy
Ennobling Direct Democracy, Sherman J. Clark
Ennobling Direct Democracy, Sherman J. Clark
Articles
In this essay, Professor Clark argues that we should be attentive to the effect that direct democracy might have on our public character. Building upon earlier work, Clark suggests that the initiative in particular threatens to debase us by undercutting a crucial character trait which might best be called "responsibility-taking." The bulk of this essay is devoted to explaining what this means, and why it matters. Why should we care about the effect of political processes on public character? Why is this particular trait important and worth preserving? How is it threatened by direct democracy? In conclusion, and by way …
The Mote In Thy Brother’S Eye: A Review Of Human Rights As Politics And Idolatry, William M. Carter Jr.
The Mote In Thy Brother’S Eye: A Review Of Human Rights As Politics And Idolatry, William M. Carter Jr.
Articles
Michael Ignatieffs provocatively titled collection of essays, Human Rights As Politics and Idolatry [hereinafter Human Rights], is a careful examination of the theoretical underpinnings and contradictions in the area of human rights. At bottom, both of his primary essays, Human Rights As Politics and Human Rights As Idolatry, make a claim that is perhaps contrary to the instincts of human rights thinkers and activists: namely, that international human rights can best be philosophically justified and effectively applied to the extent that they strive for minimal ism. Human rights activists generally argue for the opposite conclusion: that international human rights be …
A Populist Critique Of Direct Democracy, Sherman J. Clark
A Populist Critique Of Direct Democracy, Sherman J. Clark
Articles
It is often assumed that direct democratic processes - referenda and initiatives - offer the people a chance to speak more clearly than is possible through representative processes. Courts, commentators, and political leaders have defended or described direct democratic outcomes as the voice of the "people themselves." Because plebiscites allow the people to speak directly, without the potential distortion inherent in representation, they seem ideally responsive to popular will. Indeed, even critics of direct democracy appear to grant as much. Critics are quick to point out, of course, that actual plebiscites often fall far short of the ideal. Uneven voter …