Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (2)
- Derivative work (1)
- Derivative works (1)
- Durham test (1)
- Dworkin (1)
-
- John Lock (1)
- Justice for Hedgehogs (1)
- Justice in acquisition (1)
- Labor theory of property (1)
- Law (1)
- Legal interpretation (1)
- Moral objectivity (1)
- Morality (1)
- Morals (1)
- Naturalism (1)
- Originality (1)
- Principles (1)
- Slavery (1)
- Sufficiency proviso (1)
- Temporal directionality (1)
- The labor theory (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Arts and Humanities
Moral Limits Of Dworkin's Theory Of Law And Legal Interpretation, David B. Lyons
Moral Limits Of Dworkin's Theory Of Law And Legal Interpretation, David B. Lyons
Faculty Scholarship
At the foundation of Justice for Hedgehogs is a commitment to moral objectivity – the doctrine that there are right answers to moral questions. This nicely complements Dworkin’s legal theory, which holds that right answers to legal questions depend on right answers to moral questions. Without the doctrine of moral objectivity, Dworkin could not reasonably maintain, as he does, that law provides determinate answers to legal questions.
Copyright's Derivative Works Doctrine And An Upside-Down Proviso, Wendy J. Gordon
Copyright's Derivative Works Doctrine And An Upside-Down Proviso, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
It is sometimes observed that questions of "justice in acquisition" do not much arise any more. However, judges face those questions on a daily basis in courtrooms adjudicating copyright and patent matters. In United States copyright law, for example, an intriguing dilemma regarding derivative works has developed that raises what appears to be a new issue regarding John Locke's sufficiency proviso.
Draft Of Copyright's Derivative Works Doctrine And An Upside-Down Proviso - 2010, Wendy J. Gordon
Draft Of Copyright's Derivative Works Doctrine And An Upside-Down Proviso - 2010, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
It is sometimes observed that questions of'justice in acquisition" do not much arise any more. However, judges face those questions on a daily basis in courtrooms adjudicating copyright and patent matters. In United States copyright law, for example, an intriguing dilemma regarding derivative works has developed that raises what appears to be a new issue regarding John Locke's sufficiency proviso.