Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Alienation (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Critique of Justice (1)
- Economics (1)
-
- Exploitation (1)
- Fairness (1)
- Freedom (1)
- G.A. Cohen (1)
- General Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Justice (1)
- Labor Theory of Property (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Marx (1)
- Negative Freedom (1)
- Norman Geras (1)
- Politics (1)
- Positive Freedom (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Real Freedom (1)
- Rights (1)
- Theft (1)
- Unfreedom (1)
- Unjustice (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Arts and Humanities
What's Wrong With Exploitation?, Justin Schwartz
What's Wrong With Exploitation?, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
Abstract: Marx thinks that capitalism is exploitative, and that is a major basis for his objections to it. But what's wrong with exploitation, as Marx sees it? (The paper is exegetical in character: my object is to understand what Marx believed,) The received view, held by Norman Geras, G.A. Cohen, and others, is that Marx thought that capitalism was unjust, because in the crudest sense, capitalists robbed labor of property that was rightfully the workers' because the workers and not the capitalists produced it. This view depends on a Labor Theory of Property (LTP), that property rights are based ultimately …
Virginia Embargoed: The Economic And Political Effects Of The 1807-1809 Embargo On Virginia, John George Kinzie
Virginia Embargoed: The Economic And Political Effects Of The 1807-1809 Embargo On Virginia, John George Kinzie
Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects
No abstract provided.
The Price Of Empire: Anglo-French Rivalry For The Great Lakes Fur Trades, 1700-1760, Matthew R. Laird
The Price Of Empire: Anglo-French Rivalry For The Great Lakes Fur Trades, 1700-1760, Matthew R. Laird
Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects
As the English and French grappled for North American hegemony in the first half of the eighteenth century, trade with the Indian groups of the Great Lakes and Ohio Valley transcended mere financial calculations and assumed a broader imperial significance. to the native peoples who exchanged their peltry for European manufactured goods, trade was the material manifestation of mutual obligation, political dialogue, and military alliance. If the contest for empire inevitably became a battle for the hearts and minds of potential Indian allies, the spoils of victory were most visibly reckoned in furs and skins.;Yet, despite the outspoken criticism of …