Digital Commons Network^™

The Lasting Impact Of Ring V. Arizona On Capital Jury Trials, Kevin M. Morrow

Wyoming Law Review

The final decision on the imposition of the death penalty in the United States is made by either judges or juries. A wealth of empirical study has gone into comparing these two methods. Arizona, with its change to a jury-based system immediately after the landmark Supreme Court decision Ring v. Arizona, is divided into discrete eras of capital sentencing. For the first time, this article catalogs, and examines, the post-Ring capital trials that reached the question of life or death to explore systemic differences between jury and judge sentencings. The study revealed that while Arizona’s rate of death sentences increased …

Literature Review: Investing In Early Childhood Education Pays Dividends, R'Riuna Moore, Callie Poole, Heather L. Hanna

Endeavors: Mississippi State Undergraduate Research Journal

Early childhood education (ECE) programs, which include publicly sponsored pre-kindergarten, Head Start, and private child care centers, are vital to child development, family stability, and economic success. Benefits of early childhood education (ECE) include better lifetime wages, higher tax revenues, and less dependence on public assistance programs. Research has repeatedly shown that ECE offers a substantial return on investment (ROI). Federal funding for early childhood education is still scarce despite current data. This review of the literature looks at the long-term social, economic, and employment effects of ECE investments in the US, emphasizing how they can boost economic growth, increase …

How To Count To 180—It Depends: Tolling Of Time For Pretrial Detention In Massachusetts, Mitchell Fallon

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Criminal Law—What Do You “Value”? Second Circuit Broadens Federal Bank Bribery Statute To Include Intangibles—United States V. Calk, 87 F.4th 164 (2d Cir. 2023), Trevor Pilkington

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Predators With Power: Applying An Objective Standard To Address Sexual Assault And Rape Of Females In Pretrial Detention, Sara Pompeo

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Are We Safe In The Digital World? Why We Still Fall Victim To Cybercrime, Kevin Le

Honors Papers and Posters

Cybersecurity has only recently gained press coverage as millions of individuals are victimized by cyberattacks. While current cybersecurity measures offer some protection, human error has been the number one cause of cyberattacks for the past eight years (Verizon, 2024). Cybercrime continues to evolve in complexity, leveraging advanced technology and human psychology to bypass traditional security systems. This study examines why individuals still fall victim to cyberattacks. It explores the psychological and cognitive factors that make individuals vulnerable, focusing on social engineering techniques such as phishing and pretexting. This study also analyzes factors from psychological theories, including Protection Motivation Theory, Routine …

2025-2026 Graduate Catalog And Course Descriptions, Rochester Institute Of Technology

Graduate Catalog and Course Descriptions

No abstract provided.

2025-2026 Undergraduate Catalog And Course Descriptions, Rochester Institute Of Technology

Undergraduate Catalog and Course Descriptions

No abstract provided.

In Brief, Case Western Reserve University School Of Law

In Brief

Table of Contents

• Message from the Dean
• Specialty Programs Ranked Among the Best
• AI Certification Requirement
• Curricular Enhancements
• New Faculty Members
• Scholarly Impact
• Conferences and Lectures
• A New Era for Business Law at CWRU
• Meet the New Class
• News from the Kramer Law Clinic
• Impactful Student Initiatives
• Mock Trial and Moot Court Success
• Alumni Spotlight
• Society of Benchers
• Alumni Committees
• Class Notes
• In Memoriam
• Honor Roll of Donors

Informative Jury Disagreement, Roy Baharad

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

The article introduces a counterintuitive argument, contending that jury disagreement on the defendant’s guilt—a nonunanimous conviction—may well provide a more informative signal, compared to consensus. Because stronger consensus implies higher likelihood of herding, it is shown that beyond some threshold, further accumulation of votes to convict would carry negligible epistemic contribution, barely enhancing the posterior probability of guilt. On the other hand, while dissenting votes provide a direct signal of innocence, they indicate that herding has not been involved in the decision-making process, hence increase the epistemic contribution of any vote generated by said process— including votes to convict—and may …

Agonistic Federalism, Aziz Z. Huq, Zachary D. Clopton

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

It’s been called the “oldest question” of American constitutional law: How does the national government deal with its sovereign subnational states? Judges and scholars have tried to capture this dynamic via theories of “dual federalism,” “process federalism,” “cooperative federalism,” or “federalism by integration.” But all these models suddenly seem to have superseded, and even perhaps rendered obsolete, by an unexpected step-change in the intensity of federal-state conflicts. In the place of longstanding federalism models, this article demonstrates, an underappreciated form of intergovernmental relations has emerged. We call this model “agonistic federalism.” The article’s aim is to introduce and theorize this …

Tech Addiction: The Legal Limits Of A Growing Concept, Haneen Abu Ghanem

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None.

Virtual Court Proceedings And Their Effect On Criminal Defendants’ Rights, Hunter J. Phillips

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

This Comment examines whether implementing virtual evidentiary proceedings diminishes a criminal defendant’s Constitutional rights. Part One introduces the Confrontation Clause and judicial interpretations that shape its modern legal view.

Part One also introduces the importance of face-to-face testimony and how the Confrontation Clause is founded upon that principle. Part One concludes by offering psychological research that highlights the im-portance of face-to-face proceedings that allow for effective criminal proceedings. Part Two introduces legislation that hinders defendants’ Confrontation rights and critically analyzes that legislation. Part Three argues for the abandonment of virtual criminal proceedings and highlights other factors that should be considered …

Medication-Assisted Treatment Expansion For Opioid-Use Disorder In The Oregon Department Of Corrections And Post-Release From Prison, Justin Haddad

Western New England Law Review

In 2021, nearly 80,000 people died from an opioid-related overdose. This startling statistic was the impetus that led many states to try to combat opioid use disorder (OUD) over recent years. Many of these states have realized that OUD bleeds into their correctional facilities and have decided to offer Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) to incarcerated individuals. Oregon was once considered the vanguard of progressive policymaking, most recently when it enacted Measure 110 (M110), which decriminalized certain drug possession and provided treatment to people suffering from substance abuse. Oregon has recently initiated a pilot program to integrate MAT into its correctional facilities. …

The Effects Of Corporal Punishment In Childhood On Early Adulthood Cortisol And Aggression, Tyler Priest

Graduate Theses/Dissertations

The current study aimed to see if experiencing corporal punishment led to more aggressive behaviors as well as higher cortisol levels than in those who did not experience corporal punishment. The study also examined whether self-regulation moderated the relationship between corporal punishment and levels of aggression. Morning cortisol levels were collected from participants, and they completed a demographics survey, an aggression index, a corporal punishment index, and a self-regulatory inventory index. A T-test found that there was not a significant difference in morning cortisol levels between those that experienced corporal punishment and those that had not experienced corporal punishment. A …

Learned Helplessness: An Online Replication And Validation, Arshpreet (Sunny) Kandola

Graduate Theses/Dissertations

The current study entails the partial replication of a classic learned helplessness two-phase triadic design experiment within an online learning context and aimed to validate a new attributional style self-report measure designed to identify individual differences in tendencies to develop learned helplessness consistent with the original reformulation of the hypothesis. Further, recent innovations in neuroscientific technology have allowed for a deeper examination of the mechanisms at play, finding support for a major re-interpretation of the theory of learned helplessness - suggesting that helplessness is more so the default passive response, while the active ingredient that is detected or expected (i.e., …

Catalog 2025-2026, University Of North Florida

UNF Course Catalogs

No abstract provided.

Court Forms And Court Reforms: Pro Se Litigants And The Limited Success Of Standardized Family Court Forms, Caroline Rogus

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

The first step in any civil lawsuit, long before a court will contemplate awarding relief, is initiating the court matter: a plaintiff must always start by effectively pleading their case. The court system rests upon the presumption that an attorney will create and file the requisite court documents—including complaints, answers, and motions—on behalf of their client. The reality, however, is that an extraordinarily high number of litigants do not have legal representation and must therefore proceed pro se and submit these documents on their own. Most jurisdictions offer pro se litigants standardized, fillable court forms. These forms are intended to …

Apoyo En Comunidad: A Proposed Manual For Latinx And Hispanic Support Groups, Yadira Diaz Romero

Psychology Doctoral Specialization Projects

Navigating college life can be difficult; add to that the complications of navigating different cultures and it creates a chasm for young adults to overcome. This is true for many Latinx college students who often attend colleges where few resources exist to offer support in navigating these social and cultural issues in their everyday life. Additionally, while group therapy is championed as a treatment modality for many, few groups exist that target Latinx communities, especially Latinx college students. This project aims to highlight these social and cultural issues faced by Latinx individuals and provide clinicians with a treatment manual to …

A Legal Herstory Of Wwii ‘Comfort Women’— Chapters: Past, Present, And Beyond, Linny Kit Tong Ng

UC Law SF Journal on Gender and Justice

No abstract provided.

Family Court Orders Of Ostensible "Protection": Silencing Survivors And Criminalizing Conduct In Civil Courtrooms, Talia Gallo

City University of New York Law Review

Survivors of intimate partner violence should not face further abuse at the hands of the state, let alone by a tool that is meant to protect them. This Note examines how orders of protections issued by family courts during child abuse and neglect proceedings fail survivors of violence and criminalize individuals in civil courtrooms. This research examines how orders of protection do not always afford individuals due process, despite depriving many of their individual autonomy and the right to parent. Orders of protection are just one example of how family courts punitively surveil marginalized communities, creating irreparable harm under the …

The Good Friday/Belfast Agreement's Human Rights Promise—Fulfilled Or Unfulfilled?, Martin O'Brien & Maggie Beirne

Fordham International Law Journal

The recent twenty-fifth anniversary of the Good Friday (or Belfast) Agreement provided several opportunities for people in Northern Ireland to come together to reflect and comment on the successes and failures of the 1998 peace agreement. Fordham, by publishing this new collection of articles, further allows an important opportunity to share reflections on the Good Friday/Belfast Agreement, its implementation, and the current state of the peace in Northern Ireland. This Essay will provide a high-level assessment of the extent to which transition of human rights from the margins to the mainstream (as discussed in the 1999 Mageean and O’Brien article) …

The Center Cannot Hold: Icc Sanctions, Rogue Turns, And The Unmaking Of Legal Order, Devika Hovell

Fordham International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Mindfulness And Modification Therapy (Mmt) Group Feasibility And Acceptability Among Prison Residents With Dysregulated Behaviors, Leslie Unger

Theses and Dissertations

Mindfulness and Modification Therapy (MMT; Wupperman, 2019) is a transdiagnostic therapy that systematically integrates aspects of six empirically supported treatments for impulsive and dysregulated behavior. As such, MMT may offer an efficient approach to addressing a variety of dysregulated behaviors, thereby supporting increased safety within carceral settings and enhancing goals of rehabilitation. To date, MMT has demonstrated positive results in community settings when treating substance misuse and anger/aggression, but it has not yet been examined in a prison setting. The present research examines the feasibility and acceptability of using a 14-session version of group MMT as a voluntary treatment option …

The Weapon Focus Effect On Memory For Male And Female Perpetrators, Faith Christel Aasen

Theses and Dissertations

Previous research on the weapon focus effect suggests that weapon presence causes reduced memory accuracy for perpetrator details due to weapons being surprising and unexpected. The unusualness hypothesis suggests that a stronger weapon focus effect should occur when the perpetrator defies typical gender stereotypes, such as a woman holding a gun. The current study sought to examine how the weapon focus effect impacts eyewitness memory for male and female perpetrators, specifically exploring the magnitude of the effect on female perpetrators. The current study further investigated whether the own gender bias attenuates the weapon focus effect on memory for female perpetrators. …

Attributions Of Blame In Cases Of Stealthing, Shane William Knutson

Theses and Dissertations

Nonconsensual condom removal (NCCR), also known as “stealthing”, is a form of sexual abuse where an individual removes the condom without their sexual partner’s knowledge. While research regarding prevalence of NCCR has been conducted over the past decade, there are still aspects of previous research on other forms of sexual abuse that did not account for cases of NCCR. One such gap in the current literature are studies that investigate how individuals attribute blame to the victims of NCCR. Previous research has shown that there are differences in how individuals attribute blame towards victims of sexual abuse based on different …

State Of Utah, Plaintiff/Appellant, V. David Elliott, Defendant/Appellee : Brief Of Appellant

Utah Appeals Court Briefs

Appeal from denial of bindover and dismissal of all counts, in the Fifth Judicial District, Washington County, the Honorable Jay T. Winward presiding

Leading The Church Out Of White Supremacy And Toward Biblical Justice And Reconciliation: A Leadership Approach Using The Arc Model, Keenan Tyler

Doctor of Ministry Projects

Problem

Seventh-day Adventist church members need to be equipped to respond faithfully to injustice in their communities, beginning with an understanding as to how to respond to systemic racism rooted in White Supremacy.

Method

This Doctor of Ministry project implemented an adapted form of Jamar Tisby’s ARC model—Awareness, Relationships, Commitment—contextualized for a Seventh-day Adventist theological and ecclesial setting. The immediate goal was to move beyond raising awareness of racial injustice to equipping congregations to actively resist systemic racism and dismantle the lingering influence of white supremacy in church life and mission. Over six interactive sessions, 18 participants engaged in historical, …

Media Power And Racial Representation: A Critical Discourse Analysis Of Football Player, Tyreek Hill’S Police Encounter, Paulina Serwaa Gyamfi

Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports (ETD)

This thesis critically examines how mainstream media outlets construct and perpetuate racial narratives through their coverage of high-profile incidents involving Black public figures. Using the case study of NFL player Tyreek Hill’s encounter with Miami-Dade police on September 8, 2024, the research employs Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Critical Race Theory (CRT) to analyze news articles from six major outlets: The New York Times, NBC News, CBS News, ESPN, Fox News and CNN. The study explores how language choices, framing techniques, and contextual elements in media reporting influence public perceptions of race, celebrity and criminal justice. Findings reveal that while …

Stubhub For Courts? Technology, Markets, And New Solutions To Court Congestion, Ronen Avraham, William H. J. Hubbard

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

Rescheduling of court hearings is ubiquitous but virtually ignored by academic scholarship. This is so, despite its contributions to court congestion, a perennial problem for courts that has been the subject of repeated, and repeatedly unsuccessful, efforts at reform. In this Article, we aim to show that rescheduling merits scholarly attention, and by diagnosing why and how it contributes to court congestion and delay, we both explain why most efforts at reducing delay fail and identify new possibilities for speeding up dockets. We draw inspiration from online platforms such as StubHub and SpareFare, technologies that have facilitated rescheduling through easy-to-use …