Entire DC Network | Open Access Articles | Digital Commons Network™

The Shorthorn: March 31, 1981

The Shorthorn Newspaper Collection: 1980s

No abstract provided.

Go to article

The Shorthorn: January 23, 1981

The Shorthorn Newspaper Collection: 1980s

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Romance Scam Reporting And Support: Help-Seeking Timing, Trust, And Escalation, Ld Herrera

Research & Publications

Built on social engineering and identity deception, romance scams often create financial loss and distress. For victims, it can be difficult to know where to go, what information is needed, and what outcomes are realistic. This paper reports results from an anonymous survey of people who were targeted by or experienced a romance scam (completed surveys: n=386), focusing on (1) when and whether victims first reach out for help, (2) perceived difficulty and confidence in navigating support, (3) how trust relates to expectations of assistance, and (4) how loss severity relates to transfer-method complexity. When help was sought, it was …

Go to article

The Plain Solution To Federal Habeas, Charles Eric Hintz

Utah Law Review

Federal habeas is a mess. The reason is the current doctrine’s myopic proceduralism: its obsession with limiting relief through stringent and Byzantine procedural rules. This has transformed our system of federal postconviction review into an impassible thicket of procedure that forecloses merits review in even strong cases; ensnares everyone in difficult threshold questions; and delays dispositions. Habeas today is thus unfair, opaque, and inefficient, and it fails to promote its own values: fairness, judicial economy, federalism, finality, anti-gamesmanship, and non-technicality. How should we fix this problem? This Article advances a solution based on “plain error” review. Under this approach, habeas’ …

Go to article

The Shadow Of The Rules Of Evidence On Adr, Henry Zhuhao Wang

Utah Law Review

Every day, millions of disputes arise globally, yet only a small fraction escalate into legal disputes, with an even smaller proportion reaching the courtroom, where substantive law, procedural rules, and rules of evidence are applied. For the vast majority of disputes, resolved through various alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) mechanisms, formal rules of evidence such as the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”) generally do not apply. Despite this, a widely held belief persists that “rules of evidence cast a shadow on ADR,” implying that while these rules may not govern ADR processes directly, they continue to shape settlement dynamics. Legal scholars …

Go to article