Digital Commons Network^™

Environmental Law (Symposium: The Supreme Court And Local Government Law: The 1989-90 Term), Leon D. Lazer

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, George Pratt, Leon Friedman

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

From Widmar To Mergens: The Winding Road Of First Amendment Analysis, Rosemary C. Salomone

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

In 1981, the Supreme Court decided Widmar v. Vincent, holding that a state university that created a "limited open forum" by opening its facilities to student organizations must grant equal access to religiously affiliated groups. The university's failure to do so constituted content-based discrimination that violated the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court rejected the university's argument that its policy to disallow religious meetings on campus was implemented to avoid contravening establishment clause principles. The Court's opinion was inconclusive as to whether the Widmar rationale would apply to secondary schools.

During the same period, Congress …

Rent Appropriation And The Labor Law Doctrine Of Successorship, Keith N. Hylton

Faculty Scholarship

When there is a change of corporate control in a business enterprise a question arises as to whether the new employer should be bound by the predecessor's collective bargaining relationship with the union representing the predecessor's employees. This is known as the successorship problem in labor law.' Successorship doctrine is complex and controversial. Several commentators have attempted to reconcile Supreme Court decisions and to ascertain the assumptions underlying the Court's opinions in this area.2 This Article does not attempt to do this, although paradoxically, the arguments presented may lead to reconciliation of many of the Supreme Court's decisions relating to …

Rethinking "Original Intent", David B. Lyons

Faculty Scholarship

Although Dred Scott v. Sandford is one of the Supreme Court's most controversial decisions, it is not often taught or read. But its approach to constitutional interpretation is by no means outdated, and its historical importance has not diminished. So it seems a good example to consider.

Waiver Of Constitutional Issues In Criminal Cases: Confusion In The Illinois Supreme Court, Timothy P. O'Neill

Northern Illinois University Law Review

For years, a serious problem has faced an Illinois criminal defendant who challenged the constitutionality of the statute supporting his conviction for the first time on appeal. Two contradictory lines of Illinois Supreme Court authority came to opposite conclusions on whether the issue had been waived. This article examines the failure of the Illinois Supreme Court squarely to confront this issue.

Administrative Failure And Local Democracy: The Politics Of Deshaney, Jack M. Beermann

Faculty Scholarship

This Essay is an effort to construct a normative basis for a constitutional theory to resist the Supreme Court's recent decision in DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services.¹ In DeShaney, the Court decided that a local social service worker's failure to prevent child abuse did not violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment even though the social worker "had reason to believe" the abuse was occurring. ² Chief Justice Rehnquist's opinion for the Court held that government inaction cannot violate due process unless the state has custody of the victim, ³ thus settling a controversial …

A Course On The Constitution, Thomas E. Baker, James E. Viator

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

The Solicitor General And The Evolution Of Activism, James L. Cooper

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

In Search Of A Fourth Amendment For The Twenty-First Century, Lewis R. Katz

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Resolving Retroactivity After: Teague V. Lane, Ellen E. Boshkoff

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Substantive Due Process Analysis And The Lockean Liberal Tradition: Rethinking The Modern Privacy Cases, Jeffrey S. Koehlinger

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Arbitration Of Securities Disputes: Rodriguez And New Arbitration Rules Leave Investors Holding A Mixed Bag, William C. Hermann

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Cultures: The Mentality And Consequences Of Judicial Review, Leonard P. Strickman

Northern Illinois University Law Review

In this book review, Professor Strickman concludes that, overall, Robert Nagel has produced a thought-provoking book that endorses judicial self-restraint by the United States Supreme Court. Although this review challenges some of Nagel's assertions, Strickman maintains this book should be a valuable addition to the libraries of constitutional law scholars.

In Lieu Of Preclusion: Reconciling Administrative Decisionmaking And Federal Civil Rights Claims, Marjorie A. Silver

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Religious Free Speech Rights Of Students In Public Schools: The Educator's Dilemma, Rosalie Levinson

Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Book Review: The Limits Of Judicial Power: The Supreme Court In American Politics, David S. Bogen

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Supreme Court And The First Amendment: The 1989-90 Term, Elliot M. Mincberg

NYLS Journal of Human Rights

No abstract provided.

Federal Jurisdiction, Ronald J. Mann

Faculty Scholarship

One important task of the federal judiciary is to resolve cases presenting tensions between national and state governments. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit justly is renowned for its work in this area. One major, if not sensational, arena in which these tensions surface is in cases presenting issues of federal jurisdiction, pursuant to which federal courts allocate power between the national and state judicial systems.

During the survey period the Fifth Circuit published almost one hundred opinions dealing with substantive issues of federal jurisdiction. Like others before me, I have not undertaken in this essay …

First Amendment And Land Use, In Recent Developments In Land Use, Planning, And Zoning, Alan C. Weinstein

Law Faculty Articles and Essays

Once again in the past year, the U.S. Supreme Court has entered an opinion involving the first amendment that has significant ramifications for local zoning and planning. This marks the third time since 1986 that the Court has handed down a decision in this field. The most important development in this area of the law since last year's committee report is the Supreme Court's decision in FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas, which addressed the validity of a comprehensive adult entertainment zoning and licensing ordinance enacted by Dallas in 1986. FW/PBS was followed with great interest because it marked the …

Liberalism Republicanism And The Abortion Controversy, Gary C. Leedes

Law Faculty Publications

This article considers the abortion controversy in the context of intellectual history and political theory. It does not analyze the Supreme Court's recent abortion cases, rely upon formal legal reasoning, or predict how the Court will decide any cases currently pending on its docket. Instead, it examines the Court's current options in light of the intersecting and pliable traditions of liberalism and republicanism. ...

The Future Of Minority Set-Aside Programs After City Of Richmond, Judy Kerczewski Kranjc

Cleveland State Law Review

One type of controversial affirmative action plan is the minority set-aside program. This Note will focus on the future of these plans in the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision, City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. First, an examination of the background of affirmative action leading up to set-asides is in order. Second, this Note will analyze City of Richmond and the constitutional and social issues at stake, balancing whether minority set-asides are needed with the recognition that discrimination and lack of economic opportunity for minorities still exists in our society. Finally, the Note will examine several lower …

Abortion Rights (Symposium: The Supreme Court And Local Government Law; The 1989-90 Term), Eileen Kaufman

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

Affirmative Action Doctrine And The Conflicting Messages Of Croson, Doug D. Scherer

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

Using The Constitution: Separation Of Powers And Damages For Constitutional Violations, James A. Thomson

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Organizational Standing In Environmental Litigation, Jeanne A. Compitello

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Slaying The Dragon Of Politics With The Sword Of Law: Bork's Tempting Of America, Gerard V. Bradley

Journal Articles

The Tempting of America by Robert Bork book review.

The Tempting Of America, Gerard V. Bradley

Journal Articles

THE TEMPTING OF AMERICA by Robert Bork. New York: The Free Press/Macmillan, 1990. Hdbd: pp. xiv-432.

In the concluding third of The Tempting of America Robert Bork recounts his unsuccessful fight to gain Senate confirmation to the Supreme Court.

Bork relates his war story to the rest of the book. In the first two-thirds of Tempting, he takes us on a grand tour of the Constitution's career, starting in the courts with Chief Justice John Marshall, on through the Civil War, Reconstruction, and New Deal eras. He finishes with a detailed examination of the Warren, Burger and Rehnquist Courts. …

Supreme Court, Plain Meaning, And The Changed Rules Of Evidence, Randolph N. Jonakait

Articles & Chapters

No abstract provided.

Harmless Error And The Valid Rule Requirement, Henry Paul Monaghan

Faculty Scholarship

Nearly a decade ago in the pages of this journal, in discussing the nature of overbreadth challenges, I drew attention to what may be characterized as the "valid rule requirement." A defendant in a coercive action always has standing to challenge the rule actually applied to him. This means that he can resist sanctions unless they are imposed in accordance with a constitutionally valid rule, whether or not his own conduct is constitutionally privileged. The valid rule requirement focuses upon the rule as applied to the defendant by the jury instructions. In Pope v. Illinois the Court held that harmless …