Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (3072)
- Constitutional Law (1500)
- Supreme Court of the United States (970)
- Courts (689)
- Judges (412)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (305)
- Jurisprudence (262)
- First Amendment (250)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (249)
- State and Local Government Law (244)
- Criminal Law (222)
- Criminal Procedure (201)
- Legal History (190)
- Fourteenth Amendment (175)
- Law and Politics (159)
- Law and Society (141)
- Legislation (140)
- Law and Philosophy (135)
- Political Science (124)
- Fourth Amendment (117)
- Litigation (107)
- Administrative Law (106)
- Law and Race (106)
- Election Law (96)
- Civil Procedure (90)
- Intellectual Property Law (85)
- Jurisdiction (82)
- Law and Gender (77)
- Environmental Law (73)
- Health Law and Policy (71)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (583)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (184)
- University of Richmond (127)
- Duquesne University (120)
- Georgetown University Law Center (117)
-
- Columbia Law School (97)
- New York Law School (84)
- St. Mary's University (74)
- Fordham Law School (67)
- University of Georgia School of Law (65)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (63)
- St. John's University School of Law (62)
- Boston University School of Law (61)
- Duke Law (61)
- Emory University School of Law (57)
- Pepperdine University (57)
- American University Washington College of Law (55)
- Notre Dame Law School (54)
- University of Baltimore Law (54)
- The University of Akron (52)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (49)
- University of Miami Law School (42)
- University of Colorado Law School (39)
- Cleveland State University (38)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (37)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (35)
- University of Kentucky (31)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (29)
- Washington University in St. Louis (28)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (27)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (471)
- Faculty Scholarship (285)
- Indiana Law Journal (161)
- Scholarly Works (131)
- Hallowed Secularism (116)
-
- Faculty Articles (107)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (96)
- Law Faculty Publications (74)
- Faculty Publications (72)
- All Faculty Scholarship (64)
- Journal Articles (55)
- Pepperdine Law Review (54)
- University of Richmond Law Review (53)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (50)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Equality (41)
- NYLS Law Review (37)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (34)
- Fordham Law Review (30)
- Articles & Chapters (27)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (27)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (27)
- Articles (24)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (24)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (24)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (21)
- University of Miami Law Review (20)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (19)
- Nevada Law Journal (19)
- Saint Louis University Law Journal (19)
- American University Law Review (18)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2581 - 2610 of 3272
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Court And The Changing Constitution: A Discussion, Carl Sividorski, James Gardner, Barry Latzer, Peter Galie
The Court And The Changing Constitution: A Discussion, Carl Sividorski, James Gardner, Barry Latzer, Peter Galie
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rights And Freedoms Under The State Constitution: A New Deal For Welfare Rights, Sandra M. Stevenson, Eve Cary, Mary Falk, Helen Hershkoff, Robert A. Heverly
Rights And Freedoms Under The State Constitution: A New Deal For Welfare Rights, Sandra M. Stevenson, Eve Cary, Mary Falk, Helen Hershkoff, Robert A. Heverly
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1983 Litigation, Martin A. Schwartz
Tragic Irony Of American Federalism: National Sovereignty Versus State Sovereignty In Slavery And In Freedom, The Federalism In The 21st Century: Historical Perspectives, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Tragic Irony Of American Federalism: National Sovereignty Versus State Sovereignty In Slavery And In Freedom, The Federalism In The 21st Century: Historical Perspectives, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
A plurality on the Supreme Court seeks to establish a state-sovereignty based theory of federalism that imposes sharp limitations on Congress's legislative powers. Using history as authority, they admonish a return to the constitutional "first principles" of the Founders. These "first principles," in their view, attribute all governmental authority to "the consent of the people of each individual state, not the consent of the undifferentiated people of the Nation as a whole." Because the people of each state are the source of all governmental power, they maintain, "where the Constitution is silent about the exercise of a particular power-that is, …
Politics And The Rehnquist Court, James F. Simon
Politics And The Rehnquist Court, James F. Simon
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Text, Texts, Or Ad Hoc Determinations: Interpretation Of The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Randolph N. Jonakait
Text, Texts, Or Ad Hoc Determinations: Interpretation Of The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Randolph N. Jonakait
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court In United States History: A New Appreciation, Michael Allan Wolf
The Supreme Court In United States History: A New Appreciation, Michael Allan Wolf
Law Faculty Publications
From a perspective long removed in terms of time and experience, I can still recall my first encounter with Charles Warren's Pulitzer Prize winner that still serves as the standard institutional history of the Court. My undergraduate constitutional history professor and I were engaged in a lively discussion concerning the nature of sovereignty and states' rights in the wake of the Union victory in the Civil War.He pulled from an office shelf a well-worn volume from his set of Warren's time-honored narrative. ...
The New Activist Court, Donald H. Zeigler
Introduction: Dialogue On The Solomon Lecture: Politics And The Rehnquist Court, Nadine Strossen
Introduction: Dialogue On The Solomon Lecture: Politics And The Rehnquist Court, Nadine Strossen
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Noam Chomsky And Judicial Review, James G. Wilson
Noam Chomsky And Judicial Review, James G. Wilson
Cleveland State Law Review
This Commentary will consider four authorities who are hardly considered standard-bearers of the Left: Aristotle, Edmund Burke, James Madison, and Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. Insights from Aristotle, Burke, Madison, Holmes, and Chomsky will be combined into following set of propositions: (1) the Supreme Court has a constitutional and historical obligation to resist tyranny and other forms of constitutional perversion and factionalism; (2) the Supreme Court has a unique duty and capacity to combat abuses of private power; (3) private corporations and the well-to-do have gained so much power that they have become a dangerous faction that is turning our government …
Social Engineers With Jds, Gerard V. Bradley
Social Engineers With Jds, Gerard V. Bradley
Journal Articles
Stephen B. Presser: Recapturing the Constitution: Race, Religion, and Abortion Reconsidered. (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 1994. Pp. xiv, 398. $24.95.)
With Recapturing the Constitution Steven Presser has launched a heat-seeking missile. It is, he confesses without contrition, "politically incorrect," "the same sort of exercise Allan Bloom was attempting in Closing of the American Mind" (pp. 12, 11). Presser aims to diagnose what ails our constitutional law as Bloom did our universities and culture. Presser argues that constitutional law is very sick indeed, and that it threatens to kill our body politic.
Original Intent And Article Iii, Michael L. Wells, Edward J. Larson
Original Intent And Article Iii, Michael L. Wells, Edward J. Larson
Scholarly Works
Article III of the United States Constitution sets limits on the ability of the legislature to expand or contract the jurisdiction of the federal courts. The Supreme Court has generally held that Article III's restraints on the power of the legislature to restrict the jurisdiction of the federal courts are few and extremely permissive. Many scholars, however, argue that Article III imposes some strong limitations on the legislature's ability to define federal jurisdiction. Strangely, both sides of the debate rely on originalist arguments. This Article argues that reliance on the Framers' intent to resolve issues of federal courts law is …
Abdication Can Be Fun, Join The Orgy, Everyone: A Simpleton’S Perspective On Abdication Of Federal Land Management Responsibilities, George Cameron Coggins
Abdication Can Be Fun, Join The Orgy, Everyone: A Simpleton’S Perspective On Abdication Of Federal Land Management Responsibilities, George Cameron Coggins
Challenging Federal Ownership and Management: Public Lands and Public Benefits (October 11-13)
14 pages.
The Capital Jury Project: Rationale, Design, And Preview Of Early Findings, William J. Bowers
The Capital Jury Project: Rationale, Design, And Preview Of Early Findings, William J. Bowers
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Violence, Representation, And Responsibility In Capital Trials: The View From The Jury, Austin Sarat
Violence, Representation, And Responsibility In Capital Trials: The View From The Jury, Austin Sarat
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Cross-Overs-Capital Jurors Who Change Their Minds About The Punishment: A Litmus Test For Sentencing Guidelines, Marla Sandys
Cross-Overs-Capital Jurors Who Change Their Minds About The Punishment: A Litmus Test For Sentencing Guidelines, Marla Sandys
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Should Juries And The Death Penalty Mix?: A Prediction About The Supreme Court's Answer, Christopher Slobogin
Should Juries And The Death Penalty Mix?: A Prediction About The Supreme Court's Answer, Christopher Slobogin
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Where's The Buck?: Juror Misperception Of Sentencing Responsibility In Death Penalty Cases, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Where's The Buck?: Juror Misperception Of Sentencing Responsibility In Death Penalty Cases, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Corporation Of The Presiding Bishop V. Amos, Matthew David Dimick
Corporation Of The Presiding Bishop V. Amos, Matthew David Dimick
Brigham Young University Prelaw Review
The Supreme Court has long sought for a consistent principle in constitutional theory that will "be a master principle that can guide the interpretation of both religion clauses" (Tushnet, 1691). Indeed, at times both the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause seem to contradict. Such an instance arose in Corporation of the Presiding Bishop v. Amos. In this case the Court applied the religious accommodation principle to allow a religious group the right to remain an autonomous entity thereby maintaining protection guaranteed under the Free Exercise Clause, also recognizing "that the government may (and sometimes must) accommodate religious practices …