Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (550)
- Evidence (324)
- Criminal Law (194)
- Criminal Procedure (150)
- Constitutional Law (63)
-
- Courts (41)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (37)
- Litigation (37)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (32)
- Law and Society (29)
- Fourth Amendment (22)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (20)
- Judges (20)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (20)
- Supreme Court of the United States (20)
- Jurisprudence (19)
- Law and Race (18)
- Legal Profession (15)
- Science and Technology Law (15)
- Fourteenth Amendment (14)
- Law and Gender (14)
- Legal History (14)
- Legal Studies (14)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (13)
- Legislation (13)
- State and Local Government Law (13)
- Law and Psychology (12)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (11)
- International Law (11)
- Civil Procedure (10)
- Institution
-
- Fordham Law School (34)
- William & Mary Law School (31)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (21)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (20)
- Duke Law (19)
-
- Pepperdine University (19)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (17)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (17)
- University of Michigan Law School (17)
- BLR (16)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (15)
- American University Washington College of Law (13)
- University of Georgia School of Law (12)
- University of South Carolina (11)
- West Virginia University (11)
- Boston University School of Law (10)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (10)
- Southern Methodist University (10)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (10)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (10)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (10)
- Cornell University Law School (8)
- Georgetown University Law Center (7)
- Pace University (7)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (7)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (7)
- The University of Akron (7)
- University of Baltimore Law (7)
- University of Kentucky (7)
- University of Miami Law School (7)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Publications (43)
- Faculty Scholarship (28)
- Fordham Law Review (28)
- Articles (19)
- Pepperdine Law Review (18)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (16)
- ExpressO (15)
- Law and Contemporary Problems (12)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (11)
- South Carolina Law Review (11)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (10)
- West Virginia Law Review (10)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (9)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (8)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (8)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (8)
- Akron Law Review (7)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (7)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (7)
- Scholarly Works (7)
- Faculty Working Papers (6)
- Journal of Legal Education (6)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (6)
- Maryland Law Review (5)
- Popular Media (5)
- Touro Law Review (5)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (5)
- William & Mary Law Review (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Duke Law Journal (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 571 - 586 of 586
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Anatomy Of Proof In Civil Actions, Joe W. Sanders
The Anatomy Of Proof In Civil Actions, Joe W. Sanders
Louisiana Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Complex Of Proof, John Edgar Hoover
Whence And Whither The Mere Evidence Rule?, W. Thomas Tête
Whence And Whither The Mere Evidence Rule?, W. Thomas Tête
Louisiana Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proof By Confession, O. John Rogge
Proof By Confession, O. John Rogge
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
A Dissent From The Miranda Dissents: Some Comments On The 'New' Fifth Amendment And The Old 'Voluntariness' Test, Yale Kamisar
A Dissent From The Miranda Dissents: Some Comments On The 'New' Fifth Amendment And The Old 'Voluntariness' Test, Yale Kamisar
Articles
F the several conferences and workshops (and many lunch conversations) on police interrogation and confessions in which I have participated this past summer3 are any indication, Miranda v. Arizona' has evoked much anger and spread much sorrow among judges, lawyers and professors. In the months and years ahead, such reaction is likely to be translated into microscopic analyses and relentless, probing criticism of the majority opinion. During this period of agonizing appraisal and reappraisal, I think it important that various assumptions and assertions in the dissenting opinions do not escape attention.
Has The Court Left The Attorney General Behind? The Bazelon-Katzenbach Letters On Poverty, Equality, And The Administration Of Criminal Justice, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Distribution of the first preliminary draft of the proposed American Law Institute Model Code of Pre-Arraignment Procedure last June touched off a brisk exchange of letters between Chief Judge David Bazelon of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, who maintained that the proposed code left a good deal to be desired, and Attorney General Nicholas deB. Katzenbach, who, although he did not explicitly treat any provision of the preliminary draft, sharply challenged the conception of equality underlying Bazelon's criticism of it. By now, both the code, and the Bazelon-Katzenbach correspondence which it evoked, are …
Derivative Evidence Under Mcnabb-Mallory
Derivative Evidence Under Mcnabb-Mallory
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Dilemma Of The Directed Acquittal, Richard H. Winningham
The Dilemma Of The Directed Acquittal, Richard H. Winningham
Vanderbilt Law Review
Some of the worst abuses of state criminal due process, the author believes, result from anachronistic and artificial restraints which prevent the trial judge from directing acquittals. Therefore,he advocates for all states a uniform policy and practice recognizing and authorizing directed acquittals where the evidence is legally insufficient to support a conviction.
The Theory Of Criminal Discovery And The Practice Of Criminal Law, David W. Louisell
The Theory Of Criminal Discovery And The Practice Of Criminal Law, David W. Louisell
Vanderbilt Law Review
To crystallize in a few words the motif of a career as varied and comprehensive as that of Eddie Morgan would in any event be difficult, but it is doubly so for a life devoted, as his has been, to stuff as vital and dynamic as procedure and evidence. For me, his work most fundamentally is to be characterized as a quest for greater rationality in the adjudicative process. Whether one thinks of his analysis of the hearsay rule,' or his rationale of the admissions exception to it, or his treatment of the dead man's statute, or his study of …
Book Review, Law Review Staff
Book Review, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
The National Probation and Parole Association has been working for over 35 years to improve the administration of justice and in the publication of "Guides for Sentencing" it has provided one of its most important services to judges who are charged with the administration of criminal justice and to juvenile and domestic relations courts. The book is the first of a series of practical manuals for all of the above named courts and it is the result of the combined labors of 37 specially selected United States, state and juvenile judges for a period of about five years. Bolitha J. …
Book Reviews, Ronan E. Degnan, James J. Lenoir (Reviewer), David H. Vernon (Reviewer), David W. Louisell (Reviewer), David Maxwell (Reviewer)
Book Reviews, Ronan E. Degnan, James J. Lenoir (Reviewer), David H. Vernon (Reviewer), David W. Louisell (Reviewer), David Maxwell (Reviewer)
Vanderbilt Law Review
Book Reviews:
Cases and Materials on Evidence, Fourth Edition. By Morgan, Maguide & Weinstein Brooklyn: Foundation Press, 1957. Pp. xxiv,880. $11.00
reviewers: Ronan E. Degnan and David W. Louisell
==================================
Estate Planning and Taxation Two volumes. By William J. Bowe Buffalo: Dennis & Company, Inc., 1957. Vol. I, pp. lvi, 590; Vol. II,pp. viii, 614.
reviewer: James J. Lenoir
===================================
The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law By Glanville Williams. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1957. Pp. xi, 350. $5.00.
reviewer: David H. Vernon
===================================
Current Legal Problems Edited by G. W. Keeton & G. Schwarzenberger London: Stevens & …
Medical-Legal Relations - The Brighter Side, C. Joseph Stetler
Medical-Legal Relations - The Brighter Side, C. Joseph Stetler
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
A Commentary on Recent Case Law --By Subject:
Constitutional Law--Due Process--Use in State Prosecution of Evidence obtained by Illegal Invasion of Privacy
==============================
Constitutional Law--Unlawful Search and Seizure--Admissibility of Evidence for Impeachment Purposes
===============================
Evidence--Radar Evidence of Speed--Coincidence of Radar and Speedometer Readings as Hearsay
===============================
Federal Courts--State NonResident Motorist Statute--Waiver of Federal Venue Privilege
===============================
Federal Jurisdiction--Diversity of Citizenship--Retroactive Effect of Amendments to Perfect Jurisdiction
===============================
Income Taxation--Deductions--Periodic Alimony Payments
===============================
Labor Law--Preemptive Effect of Taft-Hartley--Scope of State Jurisdiction
===============================
Torts--Dog Bite--Owner's Scienter
===============================
Workmen's Compensation--Accident Arising out of Employment--Pre-Existing Heart Disease
Evidentiary Privileges Against The Production Of Data Within The Control Of Executive Departments, William V. Sanford
Evidentiary Privileges Against The Production Of Data Within The Control Of Executive Departments, William V. Sanford
Vanderbilt Law Review
In the conduct of their affairs the various executive departments and administrative agencies acquire much information--reports, documents, records of all kinds, and other data--which may be useful to litigants in civil and criminal actions. The public interest in a full and fair hearing of all disputes between individuals and between individuals and the state calls for the production and disclosure of all evidence relevant to the issues in dispute.' This public interest calls for the production and disclosure of relevant evidence within the control of executive departments and administrative agencies. The evidence sought, however, may be of such a nature …