Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (3529)
- Constitutional Law (2333)
- Supreme Court of the United States (268)
- First Amendment (255)
- Courts (253)
-
- Legal History (243)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (235)
- Jurisprudence (221)
- Criminal Law (194)
- Law and Society (160)
- Judges (152)
- State and Local Government Law (146)
- International Law (139)
- Law and Politics (130)
- Criminal Procedure (124)
- Fourteenth Amendment (117)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (114)
- Administrative Law (112)
- Religion Law (97)
- Health Law and Policy (94)
- Jurisdiction (85)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (80)
- Legislation (79)
- Law and Gender (78)
- President/Executive Department (78)
- Education Law (77)
- Human Rights Law (72)
- Property Law and Real Estate (65)
- Fourth Amendment (64)
- Labor and Employment Law (61)
- Institution
-
- Duke Law (348)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (305)
- American University Washington College of Law (156)
- University of Colorado Law School (140)
- The University of Akron (131)
-
- Boston University School of Law (120)
- Notre Dame Law School (120)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (118)
- Columbia Law School (116)
- Fordham Law School (109)
- University of Georgia School of Law (100)
- Pepperdine University (94)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (92)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (82)
- West Virginia University (78)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (70)
- Georgetown University Law Center (67)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (61)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (61)
- University of South Carolina (60)
- William & Mary Law School (58)
- Western New England University (51)
- Cornell University Law School (50)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (49)
- University of Miami Law School (49)
- Cleveland State University (43)
- Association of American Law Schools (42)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (38)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (38)
- University of Maine School of Law (36)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (514)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (191)
- Publications (131)
- Scholarly Works (120)
- Fordham Law Review (87)
-
- West Virginia Law Review (77)
- Pepperdine Law Review (76)
- Law and Contemporary Problems (74)
- Notre Dame Law Review (69)
- Faculty Publications (67)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (66)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (64)
- Journal Articles (63)
- PEEL Alumni Scholarship (63)
- Akron Law Review (62)
- ConLawNOW (60)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (59)
- Touro Law Review (58)
- Maryland Law Review (53)
- South Carolina Law Review (53)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (47)
- Duke Law Journal (46)
- Western New England Law Review (46)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (44)
- St. Thomas Law Review (44)
- Journal of Legal Education (42)
- American University Law Review (38)
- Law Faculty Publications (38)
- Cornell Law Review (37)
- Faculty Working Papers (37)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 391 - 420 of 3874
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Lessons Of The Plague Years, Barry Sullivan
Lessons Of The Plague Years, Barry Sullivan
Faculty Publications & Other Works
The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged governments of every description across the globe, and it surely would have tested the mettle of any American administration. But the pandemic appeared in the United States at a particularly inopportune time. January 2020 marked the beginning of a presidential election year in a deeply polarized country. President Donald Trump was a controversial figure, beginning the fourth year of a highly idiosyncratic administration. He was both a candidate for re-election and the subject of an ongoing impeachment proceeding. In these circumstances, the pandemic quickly became politicized. President Trump's response to the COVID-19 pandemic has often …
Gouverneur Morris And The Drafting Of The Federalist Constitution, William M. Treanor
Gouverneur Morris And The Drafting Of The Federalist Constitution, William M. Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Salmon P. Chase Colloquium series has had two themes: One is great moments in constitutional law, and the other is people who have been forgotten but should not have been. This colloquium is primarily in the latter category—it is about a forgotten founder of the Constitution. But the Constitution has more than one forgotten founder. I did a Google search this afternoon for “Forgotten Founder” and there are a whole series of books on various people who are the Constitution’s Forgotten Founder. So the Chase Colloquium series has another decade of subjects: Luther Martin, George Mason, Charles Pinckney, Roger …
A State Within A State: Re-Examining The Federal Lands Question And Its Effect On State Sovereignty, David Wilde
A State Within A State: Re-Examining The Federal Lands Question And Its Effect On State Sovereignty, David Wilde
William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review
Though the path of the public lands debate is well-trodden, this Note will seek to answer the question in novel ways. First, it uses the Corpus of Founding Era American English to perform an objective linguistic analysis of the phrase “dispose of” in the Property Clause. Through this analysis, it appears that an ordinary person at the time the Constitution was adopted would most likely have read the phrase “dispose of” in the Property Clause to mean sell, give away, bestow, or put into another’s hand or power.
Next, this Note investigates the historical and philosophical understandings of state sovereignty …
Arbitrating Executive Privilege, Todd David Peterson
Arbitrating Executive Privilege, Todd David Peterson
American University Law Review
This Article addresses the dramatic collapse in effective congressional oversight that took place during the Trump Administration. For decades, persistent congressional committees had been able to pry documents and testimony from a recalcitrant executive branch despite the absence of legally enforceable remedies. The media typically regarded executive-privilege claims as attempts to cover up executive wrongdoing, which prompted voter suspicion that damaged the President’s approval ratings. Eventually, the political cost of asserting executive privilege would become so high that the Department of Justice would work out a negotiated settlement, which allowed Congress to obtain most of the documents and testimony it …
Constitutional Limits On The Imposition And Revocation Of Probation, Parole, And Supervised Release After Haymond, Nancy J. King
Constitutional Limits On The Imposition And Revocation Of Probation, Parole, And Supervised Release After Haymond, Nancy J. King
Vanderbilt Law Review
In its Apprendi line of cases, the Supreme Court has held that any fact found at sentencing (other than prior conviction) that aggravates the punishment range otherwise authorized by the conviction is an “element” that must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. Whether Apprendi controls factfinding for the imposition and revocation of probation, parole, and supervised release is critically important. Seven of ten adults under correctional control in the United States are serving terms of state probation and post-confinement supervision, and roughly half of all prison admissions result from revocations of such terms. But scholars have yet …
Search And Seizure Budgets, Kiel Brennan-Marquez, Stephen E. Henderson
Search And Seizure Budgets, Kiel Brennan-Marquez, Stephen E. Henderson
Faculty Articles
This article proposes a new means of restraining police power: quantitative limits on the number of law enforcement intrusions—searches and seizures—that may occur over a given period of time. Like monetary constraints, search and seizure budgets would aim to curb abusive policing and improve democratic oversight. But unlike their monetary counterparts, budgets would be indexed directly to the specific police activities that most enable escalation and abuse. What is more, budgets are a tool that finds support, conceptually, in the American framing experience. The Fourth Amendment has long been understood to require procedural limits, such as probable cause, on specific …
Living Traditionalism, Sherif Girgis
Living Traditionalism, Sherif Girgis
Journal Articles
From the Article
This Article offers the first comprehensive analysis of the Court’s living traditionalism, which turns out to include scores of cases spanning every subject and Justices of every stripe. Next, the Article identifies a fundamental but previously unrecognized tension in the method itself: If the Court gives living-traditionalist cases full weight as precedent, it defeats the reasons for using the method at all. Put another way, it is incoherent to treat political practices as a ratchet: capable of moving law in one direction (e.g., against a right in 2022) but not the other (in favor of the right …
Is Wide-Area Persistent Surveillance By State And Local Governments Constitutional?, Joseph Lake
Is Wide-Area Persistent Surveillance By State And Local Governments Constitutional?, Joseph Lake
CGU Theses & Dissertations
This dissertation addresses the following question: “Can wide-area persistent surveillance (WAPS) developed by the United States military and employed abroad as a tool in the Global War on Terror be employed domestically as a law enforcement tool without violating the US Constitution’s Fourth Amendment?” The most likely and controversial application of WAPS by state and local governments is for law enforcement. Aircraft will loiter over a city persistently taking high-definition photographs to capture locations of unidentified persons with the intent to identify persons and areas of interest for criminal investigations. Based on the Flyover Cases, aerial surveillance has few constitutional …
Voting Justice: Why The Attack On Voting Rights Is Best Understood As A "Justice" Issue, Yalda Nia
Voting Justice: Why The Attack On Voting Rights Is Best Understood As A "Justice" Issue, Yalda Nia
University of San Francisco Law Review
No abstract provided.
Notes On Continental Constitutional Identities, Benjamen F. Gussen
Notes On Continental Constitutional Identities, Benjamen F. Gussen
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Geo-constitutional analysis examines the reciprocal effect of geography on constitutions. Within this analysis, a continental constitutional identity focuses on the intersection between institutional geographies and institutional identities, where constitutions are understood as meta-institutions. In some constitutions, belonging to a continent is part of the national identity, while other constitutions only signal a non-geographic, usually an ethnic, identity. The US Constitution is an example of the former. The quintessential example of a non-geographic constitution is the Constitution of the Russian Federation. A similar disregard of continental identities can be found in Israel and the Arab League countries east of the Sinai …
Reevaluating Regional Law Reform Strategies After Dobbs, Jamie Abrams
Reevaluating Regional Law Reform Strategies After Dobbs, Jamie Abrams
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This article studies the triad of 2016 social media campaigns known as “#AskDr.Kasich,” “#askbevinaboutmyvag,” and “#PeriodsforPence.” While these campaigns, each located in the regional mid-South, were motivated by restrictive state abortion bills, they uniquely positioned menstruation and women’s bodies at the center of their activism—not abortion alone. They leveraged, as a political fault line, the contradiction of these states’ governors’ perceived disgust relating to basic women’s reproductive health, relative to their patriarchal assuredness in regulating and controlling women’s bodies.
In so doing, they tapped into meaningful disruptions in the geographies, religiosities, and masculinities of abortion politics. These campaigns achieved regional …
The Case Against Regional Transmission Monopolies, Kristen Van De Biezendos
The Case Against Regional Transmission Monopolies, Kristen Van De Biezendos
Faculty Scholarship
Over the next decade, the United States will need to build significant regional transmission infrastructure to achieve the country’s goal of net-zero power by 2035. However, there is a significant barrier: the transmission system is almost entirely owned by private monopolies. As a result, the grid has grown not to serve the public interest but in accordance with the economic priorities of these monopolies, which are not incentivized to innovate, find efficiencies, or lower costs. Past attempts to encourage competitive bidding for regional transmission projects have been stymied by laws intended to protect the monopolies, including the right of first …
Papers? Please.: Fourth Amendment Rights Of Pretrial Detainees’ Papers, Brendan Riley
Papers? Please.: Fourth Amendment Rights Of Pretrial Detainees’ Papers, Brendan Riley
Western New England Law Review
In 1984, the Supreme Court in Hudson v. Palmer, held that prisoners have no reasonable expectation of privacy within their jail cells and are not entitled to Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Court’s reasoning was focused on the security needs of penal institutions and ensuring they were not compromised by an inmate’s privacy rights. While this decision definitively answered the question concerning privacy rights of convicted prisoners, it left open the interpretation of the Fourth Amendment privacy rights of pretrial detainees. Since Hudson, courts across the country have varied on the constitutional guarantee of privacy rights …
Surveillance Technologies And Constitutional Law, Christopher Slobogin, Sarah Brayne
Surveillance Technologies And Constitutional Law, Christopher Slobogin, Sarah Brayne
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This review focuses on government use of technology to observe, collect, or record potential criminal activity in real-time, as contrasted with “transaction surveillance” that involves government efforts to access already-existing records and exploit Big Data, topics that have been the focus of previous reviews (Brayne 2018, Ridgeway 2018). Even so limited, surveillance technologies come in many guises, including closed-circuit television, automated license plate and facial readers, aerial cameras, and GPS tracking. Also classifiable as surveillance technology are devices such as thermal and electromagnetic imagers that can “see” through walls and clothing. Finally, surveillance includes wiretapping and other forms of communication …
Constitutional Limits On The Imposition And Revocation Of Probation, Parole, And Supervised Release After Haymond, Nancy J. King
Constitutional Limits On The Imposition And Revocation Of Probation, Parole, And Supervised Release After Haymond, Nancy J. King
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
In its Apprendi line of cases, the Supreme Court has held that any fact found at sentencing (other than prior conviction) that aggravates the punishment range otherwise authorized by the conviction is an "element" that must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. Whether Apprendi controls factfinding for the imposition and revocation of probation, parole, and supervised release is critically important. Seven of ten adults under correctional control in the United States are serving terms of state probation and post-confinement supervision, and roughly half of all prison admissions result from revocations of such terms. But scholars have yet …
Reasonable Classification Versus Equality Under The Indian Constitution, Jahnavi Sindhu, Vikram Aditya Narayan
Reasonable Classification Versus Equality Under The Indian Constitution, Jahnavi Sindhu, Vikram Aditya Narayan
National Law School Journal
This article critiques the standard of review most prominently applied in cases involving claims of violations of Article 14 of the Constitution: the reasonable classification test. We argue that this test is woefully inadequate in appreciating and protecting the wide-ranging nature of the right to equality. Through an examination of the origins of the reasonable classification test, we demonstrate the weak justifications initially advanced by the Indian judiciary to import it from dated United States (US) case law. Further, we highlight the substantial weaknesses of the test and explain how it precludes the judiciary from safeguarding the content of substantive …
Publicizing Corporate Secrets, Christopher J. Morten
Publicizing Corporate Secrets, Christopher J. Morten
Faculty Scholarship
Federal regulatory agencies in the United States hold a treasure trove of valuable information essential to a functional society. Yet little of this immense and nominally “public” resource is accessible to the public. That worrying phenomenon is particularly true for the valuable information that agencies hold on powerful private actors. Corporations regularly shield vast swaths of the information they share with federal regulatory agencies from public view, claiming that the information contains legally protected trade secrets (or other proprietary “confidential commercial information”). Federal agencies themselves have largely acceded to these claims and even fueled them, by construing restrictively various doctrines …
State Constitutional Rights And Democratic Proportionality, Jessica Bulman-Pozen, Miriam Seifter
State Constitutional Rights And Democratic Proportionality, Jessica Bulman-Pozen, Miriam Seifter
Faculty Scholarship
State constitutional law is in the spotlight. As federal courts retrench on abortion, democracy, and more, state constitutions are defining rights across the nation. Despite intermittent calls for greater attention to state constitutional theory, neither scholars nor courts have provided a comprehensive account of state constitutional rights or a coherent framework for their adjudication. Instead, many state courts import federal interpretive practices that bear little relationship to state constitutions or institutions.
This Article seeks to begin a new conversation about state constitutional adjudication. It first shows how in myriad defining ways state constitutions differ from the U.S. Constitution: They protect …
The Right To Amend State Constitutions, Jessica Bulman-Pozen, Miriam Seifter
The Right To Amend State Constitutions, Jessica Bulman-Pozen, Miriam Seifter
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay explores the people's right to amend state constitutions and threats to that right today. It explains how democratic proportionality review can help courts distinguish unconstitutional infringement of the right from legitimate regulation. More broadly, the Essay considers the distinctive state constitutional architecture that popular amendment illuminates.
The Possibility Of Modern India, Madhav Khosla
The Possibility Of Modern India, Madhav Khosla
Faculty Scholarship
The history of modern constitutionalism has immortalized several events of much moment. It has, however, cast scant attention upon a great deal other episodes that merit greater engagement. Among this latter category is the making of modern India – the crafting of the constitutional text that would create the world’s largest democracy. The Indian case invites attention not merely because of its size but rather because of its conditions. This postcolonial experiment involved the coming together of democratization and constitution-making in a setting that was poor, uneducated, and divided, and one that was stepped in centuries of tradition. Unlike in …
Constitutional Text, Founding-Era History, And The Independent-State-Legislature Theory, Dan T. Coenen
Constitutional Text, Founding-Era History, And The Independent-State-Legislature Theory, Dan T. Coenen
Scholarly Works
One question raised by proponents of the so-called independent-state-legislature theory concerns the extent to which state courts can apply state constitutional requirements to invalidate state laws that concern federal elections. According to one proposed application of the theory, state courts can never subject such laws to state-constitution-based judicial review. According to another application, federal courts can broadly, though not invariably, foreclose state courts from drawing on state constitutions to invalidate federal-election-related state legislation. This article evaluates whether either of these positions comports with the original meaning of the Constitution. Given the article’s focus on the originalist methodology, it directs attention …
National Federation Of Independent Business V. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012), Elizabeth Weeks, Mary Ann Chirba, Alice A. Noble
National Federation Of Independent Business V. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012), Elizabeth Weeks, Mary Ann Chirba, Alice A. Noble
Scholarly Works
In National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, decided in 2012, twenty-six states as well as private individuals and an organization of independent businesses challenged the constitutionality of two key components of the Affordable Care Act. The Court upheld the individual mandate but converted the Medicaid eligibility expansion from mandatory to optional for states. Elizabeth Weeks’ feminist rewrite breaks down the public law-private law distinction to get beyond the traditional view of health insurance as a commercial product providing individual financial protection against risk and instead to view it as effecting a risk pool premised on cross-subsidization of the health-care …
American Religious Liberty Without (Much) Theory: A Review Of Religion And The American Constitutional Experiment, 5th Edition, Nathan S. Chapman
American Religious Liberty Without (Much) Theory: A Review Of Religion And The American Constitutional Experiment, 5th Edition, Nathan S. Chapman
Scholarly Works
Book review of Religion and the American Constitutional Experiment, 5th ed. By John Witte Jr., Joel A. Nichols, and Richard W. Garnett. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. 464. $150.00 (cloth); $39.95 (paper); $26.99 (digital). ISBN: 9780197587614.
Brief Of Amici Curiae Administrative Law Scholars In Support Of Petitioner In Sec V. Jarkesy, Ronald M. Levin, Alan B. Morrison, Richard J. Pierce Jr
Brief Of Amici Curiae Administrative Law Scholars In Support Of Petitioner In Sec V. Jarkesy, Ronald M. Levin, Alan B. Morrison, Richard J. Pierce Jr
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
This is an amicus brief that several scholars have filed in the Supreme Court in SEC v. Jarkesy. The brief argues that (1) the double-for-cause removal requirement of Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB should not apply to ALJs at the SEC; and (2) the Seventh Amendment does not apply to administrative adjudication at the SEC.
Reconsidering The Public Square, Helen L. Norton
Originalism-By-Analogy And Second Amendment Adjudication, Joseph Blocher, Eric Ruben
Originalism-By-Analogy And Second Amendment Adjudication, Joseph Blocher, Eric Ruben
Faculty Scholarship
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, the Supreme Court held that the constitutionality of modern gun laws must be evaluated by direct analogy to history, unmediated by familiar doctrinal tests. Bruen’s novel approach to historical decision-making purported to constrain judicial discretion but instead enabled judicial subjectivity, obfuscation, and unpredictability. Those problems are painfully evident in courts’ faltering efforts to apply Bruen to laws regulating 3D-printed guns, assault weapons, large-capacity magazines, obliterated serial numbers, and the possession of guns on subways or by people subject to domestic-violence restraining orders. The Court’s recent grant of certiorari in United …
The Territories Under Text, History, And Tradition, Andrew Willinger
The Territories Under Text, History, And Tradition, Andrew Willinger
Faculty Scholarship
In two of its major decisions in the 2021–2022 Term, New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen and Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Court continued solidifying its originalist method of constitutional interpretation by looking increasingly to historical regulatory practice to construe how the Constitution protects individual rights. The Court is focused not only on the original public meaning of constitutional provisions, but also on historical practice. Historical laws and practices are now key to understanding how those who lived at the relevant time thought a constitutional provision might be applied and what regulatory approaches were consistent …
Common Good Gun Rights, Darrell A. H. Miller
Common Good Gun Rights, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Autonomy And Disciplinarity: Can Pseudoprofessional Speakers Select Their Own Constitutional Categorization?, Joseph Blocher
Autonomy And Disciplinarity: Can Pseudoprofessional Speakers Select Their Own Constitutional Categorization?, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Questions Of Intellectual Property And Fundamental Values In The Digital Age, Jessica Silbey
Questions Of Intellectual Property And Fundamental Values In The Digital Age, Jessica Silbey
Faculty Scholarship
Today's intellectual property debates, in both law and the larger society, are a bellwether of changing justice needs in the twenty-first century. As the digital age democratizes technological opportunities, it brings intellectual property law into mainstream everyday culture. This generates debates about the relationship between the constitutional interest in "the progress of science and useful arts" and other fundamental values, such as equality, privacy, and distributive justice. These values, which were not explicitly part of intellectual property regimes in prior eras, are especially challenged in today's internet world.
The article (which was presented as the annual Nies Lecture in April …