Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (468)
- Criminal Law (234)
- Criminal Procedure (132)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (83)
- Constitutional Law (82)
-
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (57)
- Legal Studies (45)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (44)
- Courts (37)
- Supreme Court of the United States (35)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (33)
- Law and Race (30)
- Law and Society (27)
- Sociology (25)
- Human Rights Law (23)
- Legal History (19)
- State and Local Government Law (19)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (18)
- Arts and Humanities (17)
- Judges (16)
- Jurisprudence (15)
- Criminology (14)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (14)
- Political Science (13)
- Law and Gender (12)
- Fourteenth Amendment (10)
- Health Law and Policy (10)
- International Law (9)
- Law and Politics (9)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (8)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (51)
- Cornell University Law School (37)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (34)
- Columbia Law School (28)
- Duke Law (28)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (18)
- Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University (16)
- Santa Clara Law (16)
- Cleveland State University (14)
- University of Baltimore Law (13)
- University of Miami Law School (12)
- University of Colorado Law School (11)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (10)
- St. Mary's University (10)
- Notre Dame Law School (9)
- Pepperdine University (9)
- The University of Akron (9)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (9)
- Florida State University College of Law (8)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
- University of Kentucky (7)
- University of Richmond (7)
- University of South Florida (6)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (5)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- UIdaho Law (5)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (5)
- Western New England University (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (46)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (27)
- Articles (22)
- Michigan Law Review (19)
- Capital Defense Journal (17)
-
- Hofstra Law Review (15)
- All Faculty Scholarship (14)
- Santa Clara Law Review (14)
- Law and Contemporary Problems (12)
- Indiana Law Journal (11)
- Cleveland State Law Review (8)
- Pepperdine Law Review (8)
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (7)
- Publications (7)
- Scholarly Publications (7)
- Scholarly Works (7)
- Touro Law Review (7)
- Faculty Articles (6)
- USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations (6)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (6)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (5)
- Case Western Reserve Law Review (5)
- Electronic Theses and Dissertations (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Journal Articles (5)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (5)
- University of Miami Law Review (5)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (5)
- Washington and Lee Law Review Online (5)
- Akron Law Review (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 391 - 420 of 544
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
When Balance And Fairness Collide: An Argument For Execution Impact Evidence In Capital Trials, Wayne A. Logan
When Balance And Fairness Collide: An Argument For Execution Impact Evidence In Capital Trials, Wayne A. Logan
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
A central precept of death penalty jurisprudence is that only the "death worthy" should be condemned, based on a "reasoned moral response" by the sentencing authority. Over the past decade, however, the Supreme Court has distanced itself from its painstaking efforts in the 1970s to calibrate death decision making in the name of fairness. Compelling proof of this shift is manifest in the Court's decisions to permit victim impact evidence in capital trials, and to allow jurors to be instructed that sympathy for capital defendants is not to influence capital decisions. This Article examines a novel strategy now being employed …
When Balance And Fairness Collide: An Argument For Execution Impact Evidence In Capital Trials, Wayne A. Logan
When Balance And Fairness Collide: An Argument For Execution Impact Evidence In Capital Trials, Wayne A. Logan
Scholarly Publications
A central precept of death penalty jurisprudence is that only the "death worthy" should be condemned, based on a "reasoned moral response" by the sentencing authority. Over the past decade, however, the Supreme Court has distanced itself from its painstaking efforts in the 1970s to calibrate death decision making in the name of fairness. Compelling proof of this shift is manifest in the Court's decisions to permit victim impact evidence in capital trials, and to allow jurors to be instructed that sympathy for capital defendants is not to influence capital decisions. This Article examines a novel strategy now being employed …
Agentic And Conscientic Decisions In Law: Death And Other Cases, Laura S. Underkuffler
Agentic And Conscientic Decisions In Law: Death And Other Cases, Laura S. Underkuffler
Notre Dame Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Abolition Of The Death Penalty: Does "Abolition" Really Mean What You Think It Means?, Christy A. Short
The Abolition Of The Death Penalty: Does "Abolition" Really Mean What You Think It Means?, Christy A. Short
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
No abstract provided.
Mass Media And The Death Penalty: Social Construction Of Three Nebraska Executions, Jeremy Harris Lipschultz, Michael L. Hilt
Mass Media And The Death Penalty: Social Construction Of Three Nebraska Executions, Jeremy Harris Lipschultz, Michael L. Hilt
Communication Faculty Publications
This research analyzes local TV news coverage of three Nebraska executions in the 1990s, the first in the state since 1959. The three Nebraska executions allow us to see mass media coverage of the death penalty from four perspectives: 1) media organization routines, journalistic beliefs, and how source selection affected the content; 2) justice was portrayed through a consonant set of social symbols; 3) the public support for the death penalty in this country may have led journalists to avoid tough questioning of public officials; 4) the resulting coverage was a social construction of reality that might influence future public …
Judicial Politics, Death Penalty Appeals, And Case Selection: An Empirical Study, John H. Blume, Theodore Eisenberg
Judicial Politics, Death Penalty Appeals, And Case Selection: An Empirical Study, John H. Blume, Theodore Eisenberg
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Several studies try to explain case outcomes based on the politics of judicial selection methods. Scholars usually hypothesize that judges selected by partisan popular elections are subject to greater political pressure in deciding cases than are other judges. No class of cases seems more amenable to such analysis than death penalty cases. No study, however, accounts both for judicial politics and case selection, the process through which cases are selected for death penalty litigation. Yet, the case selection process cannot be ignored because it yields a set of cases for adjudication that is far from a random selection of cases. …
Is Capital Punishment A Deterrent To Crime?, Greg Warren Colyer
Is Capital Punishment A Deterrent To Crime?, Greg Warren Colyer
Theses Digitization Project
No abstract provided.
Through The Past Darkly: A Survey Of The Uses And Abuses Of Victim Impact Evidence In Capital Trials, Wayne A. Logan
Through The Past Darkly: A Survey Of The Uses And Abuses Of Victim Impact Evidence In Capital Trials, Wayne A. Logan
Scholarly Publications
This Article examines the recent history of victim impact evidence in capital sentencing, as permitted by the United States Supreme Court's landmark 1991 decision in Payne v. Tennessee, which overruled two other recent holdings of the Court squarely prohibiting such evidence.
Life, Death And The Law - And Why Capital Punishment Is Legally Insupportable , Peter Fitzpatrick
Life, Death And The Law - And Why Capital Punishment Is Legally Insupportable , Peter Fitzpatrick
Cleveland State Law Review
Given that law has an integral commitment to life, in this lecture I want to show how the law should manifest something of a fundamental dissonance, even a terminal incoherence, when law is called upon to deal death. That is what happens in the judicial discourse on the death penalty in the United States. I will approach this demonstration in a way that may at first seem paradoxical, in a way that will bring out the deep affinity between law and death. That affinity is one in which death is, in a sense, the limit of law; a limit that …
The Imposition Of The Death Penalty In The United States Of America: Does It Comply With International Norms?, Beverly Mcqueary Smith
The Imposition Of The Death Penalty In The United States Of America: Does It Comply With International Norms?, Beverly Mcqueary Smith
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Another Look At Evolving Standards: Will Decency Prevail Against Executing The Mentally Retarded?, Bryan Lester Dupler
Another Look At Evolving Standards: Will Decency Prevail Against Executing The Mentally Retarded?, Bryan Lester Dupler
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Living With The Death Penalty, Samuel R. Gross
Living With The Death Penalty, Samuel R. Gross
Articles
The debate over the death penalty in the United States - such as it is - is framed in terms of criminal justice policy. The issues are the same ones we consider when the question is the length of prison sentence for a drug crime: Does the defendant deserve the penalty? Is it cost effective by comparison to other available sanctions? Will it deter others from committing the crimes for which he was convicted? Can we impose this punishment fairly? Can we make sure that innocent people are not condemned?
Human Rights And Human Wrongs: Is The United States Death Penalty System Inconsistent With International Human Rights Law, Warren Allmand, Stephen B. Bright, Rubin "Hurricane" Carter, Dorean Marguerite Koenig, William A. Schabas, W. L. Seriti
Human Rights And Human Wrongs: Is The United States Death Penalty System Inconsistent With International Human Rights Law, Warren Allmand, Stephen B. Bright, Rubin "Hurricane" Carter, Dorean Marguerite Koenig, William A. Schabas, W. L. Seriti
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Getting Out Of This Mess: Steps Toward Addressing And Avoiding Inordinate Delay In Capital Cases, Dwight Aarons
Getting Out Of This Mess: Steps Toward Addressing And Avoiding Inordinate Delay In Capital Cases, Dwight Aarons
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Lost Lives: Miscarriages Of Justice In Capital Cases, Samuel R. Gross
Lost Lives: Miscarriages Of Justice In Capital Cases, Samuel R. Gross
Law and Contemporary Problems
Gross discusses the incidence of erroneous convictions for capital murder, which are systematic consequences of the natuere of homicide prosection in general and capital prosecution in particular.
Recapturing The Spirit Of Furman: The American Bar Association And The New Abolitionist Politics, Austin Sarat
Recapturing The Spirit Of Furman: The American Bar Association And The New Abolitionist Politics, Austin Sarat
Law and Contemporary Problems
Sarat locates the American Bar Association's call for a moratorium on executions in the context of modern abolitionist politics. New abolitionism links anti-death penalty work with a broader civil rights agenda.
Racial Disparity And The Death Penalty, John C. Mcadams
Racial Disparity And The Death Penalty, John C. Mcadams
Law and Contemporary Problems
McAdams examines the rhetoric and data supporting the "mass market" version of the racial disparity thesis. The system is racist in that it punishes those who kill whites more severely than those who kill blacks.
Justice Blackmun, Franz Kafka, And Capital Punishment, Martha Dragich
Justice Blackmun, Franz Kafka, And Capital Punishment, Martha Dragich
Faculty Publications
The Article discusses the problem of judging death penalty cases, comparing Justice Blackmun's death penalty jurisprudence to the struggle of a character in Kafka's story. It focuses on three critical moments in the decisional process--hesitation, decision, and escape--and assesses Justice Blackmun's performance at each step. It concludes that although Justice Blackmun's views remained consistent throughout his judicial career, his death penalty legacy is equivocal, and in some important respects, unsatisfying.
Moratorium On The Death Penalty For Juveniles, Victor L. Streib
Moratorium On The Death Penalty For Juveniles, Victor L. Streib
Law and Contemporary Problems
Streib offers a sketch of the sentences and actual executions in the juvenile death penalty system for the past quarter-century. The ABA's moratorium calls for the complete prevention of the execution of offenders under age 18 at the time of their crimes.
The Execution Of The Innocent, Michael L. Radelet, Hugo Adam Bedau
The Execution Of The Innocent, Michael L. Radelet, Hugo Adam Bedau
Law and Contemporary Problems
Radelet and Bedau discuss the continuing and regular incidence of American trial courts sentencing innocent defendants to death, which was one of the problems that gave rise to the ABA's moratorium on capital punishment.
The American Bar Association And Federal Habeas Corpus, Larry W. Yackle
The American Bar Association And Federal Habeas Corpus, Larry W. Yackle
Law and Contemporary Problems
Yackle evaluates the ABA's claims touching federal habeas corpus in death penalty cases. Neither the Supreme Court nor the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 embrace the ABA's policy for habeas corpus.
The Quality Of Justice In Capital Cases: Illinois As A Case Study, Leigh B. Bienen
The Quality Of Justice In Capital Cases: Illinois As A Case Study, Leigh B. Bienen
Law and Contemporary Problems
Bienen uses Illinois as a case study of injustice in capital cases. The quality of justice in the trial and appeal of capital cases in Illinois is of a very low standard.
Fact Or Fiction? The Use Of Eighteenth-Century Criminal Biographies In Historical Studies, Steven M. Wakefield
Fact Or Fiction? The Use Of Eighteenth-Century Criminal Biographies In Historical Studies, Steven M. Wakefield
History Theses & Dissertations
Marxist studies concerning crime and criminality in eighteenth-century England, and especially London, have explained the problem strictly in terms of a class based struggle between the elites and the working poor. Marxists further contend that the majority of criminals hanged for capital offenses during the eighteenth-century also came Rom the working poor. Using an analysis of criminal biographies written between 1723 and 1783, this study questions the Marxist paradigm by suggesting that eighteenth-century crime and criminality were not inter-class conflicts but more intra-class struggles, and hangings reflected this.
Update: American Public Opinion On The Death Penalty-It’S Getting Personal , Samuel R. Gross
Update: American Public Opinion On The Death Penalty-It’S Getting Personal , Samuel R. Gross
Cornell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Racial Discrimination And The Death Penalty In The Post-Furman Era: An Empirical And Legal Overview With Recent Findings From Philadelphia , David C. Baldus, George Woodworth, David Zuckerman, Neil Alan Weiner
Racial Discrimination And The Death Penalty In The Post-Furman Era: An Empirical And Legal Overview With Recent Findings From Philadelphia , David C. Baldus, George Woodworth, David Zuckerman, Neil Alan Weiner
Cornell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Virginia's "21 Day Rule" And Illinois' Death Row Debacle: A Comparative Study In Capital Justice And The Relevance Of Innocence, Anne E. Duprey
Virginia's "21 Day Rule" And Illinois' Death Row Debacle: A Comparative Study In Capital Justice And The Relevance Of Innocence, Anne E. Duprey
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Can Inordinate Delay Between A Death Sentence And Execution Constitute Cruel And Unusual Punishment?, Dwight Aarons
Can Inordinate Delay Between A Death Sentence And Execution Constitute Cruel And Unusual Punishment?, Dwight Aarons
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Feminism And Defending Men On Death Row, Phyllis L. Crocker
Feminism And Defending Men On Death Row, Phyllis L. Crocker
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
In this Essay I explore the relationship between being a feminist and representing men on death row. It is appropriate to engage in this inquiry in considering how the law has developed in the twenty-five years since Furman v. Georgia. During that time both Furman and the advent of feminist legal theory have required a restructuring in the way we think about two fundamental legal questions: for death penalty jurisprudence, how and why we sentence an individual to death; and for feminist jurisprudence, how the law views crimes of violence against women. The relationship between these two developments becomes apparent …
Harnessing Payne: Controlling The Admission Of Victim Impact Statements To Safeguard Capital Sentencing Hearings From Passion And Prejudice, Beth E. Sullivan
Harnessing Payne: Controlling The Admission Of Victim Impact Statements To Safeguard Capital Sentencing Hearings From Passion And Prejudice, Beth E. Sullivan
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article begins by tracing the historical development of victim impact evidence through Supreme Court jurisprudence and state legislation and analyzes their use in the sentencing of phase capital punishment trials. It argues that the Supreme Court's decision in Payne V Tennessee allowing a jury to consider victim impact evidence in capital punishment sentencing is troublesome in light of a capital punishment defendant's constitutional rights, the history of the death penalty and traditional sentencing procedures. It concludes with a proposal for guidelines to regulates the use of such evidence in capital punishment sentencing,
Lost Lives: Miscarriages Of Justice In Capital Cases, Samuel R. Gross
Lost Lives: Miscarriages Of Justice In Capital Cases, Samuel R. Gross
Articles
One of the longstanding complaints against the death penalty is that it "distort[s] the course of the criminal law."' Capital prosecutions are expensive and complicated; they draw sensational attention from the press; they are litigated-before, during, and after trial-at greater length and depth than other felonies; they generate more intense emotions, for and against; they last longer and live in memory. There is no dispute about these effects, only about their significance. To opponents of the death penalty, they range from minor to severe faults; to proponents, from tolerable costs to major virtues. ntil recently, however, the conviction of innocent …