Digital Commons Network^™

Mark F. Leppert V. Catherine L. Leppert : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

Appeal from Judgment of the Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, State of Utah, the Honorable L. A. Dever, Presiding

State Of Utah V. Andrew Brink : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

Appeal from a conviction for aggravated robbery, a first degree felony, in the Third Judicial District Court of Utah, Salt Lake County, the Honorable Sheila K. McCleve presiding.

State Of Utah V. Jeffrey K. Johnson : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

Appeal From Interlocutory Orders Denying Defendant's Motion to Quash and Motion in Limine, Entered by the Honorable Stephen L. Henriod, Judge, Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, Utah

State Of Utah V. Wanda Eileen Barzee : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

BRIEF OF APPELLANT

INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL FROM DISTRICT COURT'S RULING GRANTING THE STATE'S MOTION TO COMPEL MEDICATION, IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH, THE HONORABLE JUDITH S. ATHERTON PRESIDING. APPELLANT IS CURRENTLY BEING HELD IN THE FORENSIC UNIT OF THE UTAH STATE HOSPITAL, PROVO.

Loren E. Pearce V. Oksana Zapassoff : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

Appeal from an Order in the Second Judicial District Court In and For Weber Countty, State of Utah, The Honorable Pamela Heffernan Presiding

Robert Matthew Mulder V. Tamara Rowley Mulder Aka Tamara Caputo : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

Brief of Appellant

On Appeal from the Fourth District Court - Utah County, Provo Division Judge Gary D. Stott District Court Case No. 054401811

Blauer V. Department Of Workforce Services : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

LORIN BLAUER, Petitioner, vs. UTAH DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES, an agency of the State of Utah, and UTAH CAREER SERVICE REVIEW BOARD, Respondents. No. 20061177 Agency Decision No. 28 CSRB/ H.O. 408 Priority No. 14

State Of Utah V. Jimmie And Anita Mae Butler : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

BRIEF OF APPELLEE APPEAL FROM A CONVICTION ON ONE COUNT EACH OF THEFT, A SECOND DEGREE FELONY, IN VIOLATION OF UTAH CODE ANN. § 76-6-404 (WEST 2004), AND FORGERY, A THIRD DEGREE FELONY, IN VIOLATION OF UTAH CODE ANN. § 7 6-6-501 (WEST 2004), IN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR IRON COUNTY, THE HONORABLE J. PHILIP EVES, PRESIDING

The Value Of Plea Bargaining, Scott W. Howe

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

Toward A Balanced Equation: Advocating Consistency In The Sentencing Of Serial Killers, Talitha Ebrite

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

State Of Utah V. Corey Evan Vonberg : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

Reply of Appellant Vonberg

Appellant Vonberg Replies to Appellee's brief regarding an appeal from a the Fifth Judicial Court, Iron County, State of Utah, the Honorable G. Michael Westfall presiding.

Eastern Utah Broadcasting, Workers' Compensation Fund, And Employers' Reinsurance Fund V. Labor Commission Of Utah : Brief Of Respondent, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

Petition for Review of Labor Commission Order

Steven Crawley V. : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

THE UTAH SUPREME COURT IN THE MATTER OF THE DISCIPLINE OF: STEVEN CRAWLEY, #0750, Respondent. BRIEF OF THE RESPONDENT SUPREME COURT NO. 20060451

State Of Utah V. Andrew Brink : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

Appeal from a final judgment of conviction for Aggravated Robbery, a first degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-302 (2003), entered by the Honorable Sheila K. McCleve, Third District Court, Salt Lake County, Utah. Appellant is incarcerated.

Kae Jensen V. David Leon Jensen : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

Appeal from the Sixth District Court, Sevier County, Utah Judge David L. Mower Presiding

State Of Utah V. Moses Shepherd : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

APPEAL FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT UTAH COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH, FROM A CONVICTION OF AGGRAVATED BURGLARY, A FIRST DEGREE FELONY, BEFORE THE HONORABLE LYNN W. DAVIS

Lorin Blauer V. Utah Department Of Workforce Services, An Angency Of The State Of Utah, And Utah Career Service Review Board : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

No. 20060702-CA Agency Decision No. 9CSRB83 Priority No. 14 REPLY BRIEF Petition for review of final agency decisions by the Career Service Review Board dated June 28,2006 and July 27,2006 in Agency Proceeding No. 9CSRB83

Lorin Blauer V. Department Of Workforce Services, An Agency Of The State Of Utah, And Utah Career Service Review Board : Brief Of Petitioner, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

Petition for review of final agency decisions by the Career Service Review Board dated June 28,2006 and July 27,2006 in Agency Proceeding No. 9CSRB83

Lorin Blauer V. Utah Department Of Workforce Services, An Agency Of The State Of Utah, And Utah Career Service Review Board: Brief Of Respondent, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

Brief of Department of Workforce Services Petition for Judicial Review of Decision and Final Agency Action of the Utah Career Service Review Board

The State Of Utah V. Edgar Jose Montero : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

BRIEF OF APPELLANT Appeal from a judgment of convictions for murder, a first degree felony offense under Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-203 (2003); aggravated assault, a third degree felony offense under Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-103(l)(b) (2003); and possession/purchase of a dangerous weapon, a third degree felony offense under Utah Code Ann. § 76-10- 503(3)(a) (2003), entered in the Third Judicial District Court, in and for Salt Lake County, State of Utah, the Honorable Stephen L. Henriod, presiding.

State Of Utah V. Nathaniel Thomas Yount : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

Brief of Appellee Appeal from a conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol and/or a controlled substance, a third degree felony, in the Fifth Judicial District Court of Utah, Beaver County, the Honorable G. Michael Westf all presiding
Case No. 20060901-CA

Miguel David Gedo V. Shacke' Rose : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006)

BRIEF OF APPELLANT. ON APPEAL FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT.

The Need To Revisit The Neil V. Biggers Factors: Suppressing Unreliable Eyewitness Identification, Suzannah B. Gambell

Wyoming Law Review

No abstract provided.

Cultural Sensitivity Beyond Ethnicity: A Universal Precautions Model, Deborah Dysart Gale

Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice

Cross-cultural healthcare research has grown exponentially in recent years, focusing primarily on the healthcare-related needs of ethnic and linguistic minorities. However, by approaching cultural sensitivity from an ethnic/linguistic perspective, the practitioner runs the risk of relying on essentialized or stereotyped accounts of cultural groups, as well as overlooking the needs of other groups (e.g., gays, elderly, physically challenged) that may validly be viewed as cultures and profitably studied with the tools of cross-cultural scholarship. This essay argues that Hofstede’s paradigm of cultural dimensions can serve as a useful foundation for providing culturally sensitive care following the model of Universal Precautions …

Illegal Peace?: An Inquiry Into The Legality Of Power-Sharing With Warlords And Rebels In Africa, Jeremy I. Levitt

Journal Publications

When warlords use violence to coerce democratically constituted governments to share power, does power-sharing simply become a euphemism for "guns for jobs"? Which legal rules, if any, govern peace agreements in internal conflicts? Specifically, which rules regulate power-sharing? Are the aims of peace, justice, and adherence to the rule of law attainable, let alone compatible, with coerced political transitions where warlords force democratically constituted or legitimate governments to share power?

This Article represents the first conscientious attempt to address these questions, present a conceptual framework for examining the legal and political efficacy of coercing democratically constituted governments into sharing power, …

Are We Responsible For Our Emotions And Moods?, Michael Schleifer, Miriam S. Mccormick

Philosophy Faculty Publications

The short answer to the question in the title of this paper is "yes." Our thesis is that we are indeed responsible for our emotions and moods. We want to help children understand that just as they are responsible for what they do and say, or omit to do or say (along with the consequences of these acts), so are they responsible for much of their affective life. What remains is to explain what we mean by "responsibility," "emotions," and "moods."

The Cult Of Love, Michal Paul

All Volumes (2001-2008)

There can be no doubt that romantic love is, at a minimum, a cultural preoccupation; arguably, it closer resembles a frenzied obsession. Love is the subject of song lyrics, television shows, films, books, watercooler conversation, gossip, scandal, historic tragedy, and uncountable daydreams and fantasies. Type “romantic love” into a Google search and you will retrieve over 4,570,000 hits for websites featuring the topic. We even recognize a national holiday in its honor. Certainly one could say that love is an ultimate concern in American culture. Just how deep, though, is our devotion to its tenets? I argue that people live …

Sacred Heart University Magazine, Winter 2006, Sacred Heart University

Sacred Heart University Magazine

No abstract provided.

Jury Instructions, Not Problematic Expert Testimony, In Child Sexual Assault Cases, Marina Moriarty

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Confronting Conventional Thinking: The Heuristics Problem In Feminist Legal Theory, Nancy Levit

Faculty Works

The thesis of The Heuristics Problem is that the societal problems about which identity theorists are most concerned often spring from and are reinforced by thinking riddled with heuristic errors. This article first investigates the ways heuristic errors influence popular perceptions of feminist issues. Feminists and critical race theorists have explored the cognitive bias of stereotyping, but have not examined the ways probabilistic errors can have gendered consequences. Second, The Heuristics Problem traces some of the ways cognitive errors have influenced the development of laws relating to gender issues. It explores instances in judicial decisions in which courts commit heuristic …