Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (11191)
- Constitutional Law (1622)
- State and Local Government Law (947)
- Torts (910)
- Courts (879)
-
- Contracts (846)
- Estates and Trusts (841)
- Supreme Court of the United States (837)
- Legislation (770)
- Property Law and Real Estate (747)
- Legal History (684)
- Legal Writing and Research (674)
- Criminal Law (636)
- Labor and Employment Law (625)
- Business Organizations Law (596)
- Evidence (542)
- Jurisdiction (541)
- Tax Law (500)
- Banking and Finance Law (475)
- Criminal Procedure (462)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (461)
- Securities Law (456)
- Litigation (446)
- Law and Society (423)
- Commercial Law (421)
- Civil Procedure (418)
- Administrative Law (404)
- Fourteenth Amendment (361)
- Common Law (358)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (353)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (404)
- Book reviews (279)
- Liability (266)
- Negligence (249)
- Michigan (245)
-
- History (241)
- Fraud (223)
- New York (205)
- Treatises (193)
- Due process (192)
- Publications (181)
- Constitution (166)
- Judicial review (157)
- Intent (149)
- Law reform (149)
- Regulation (143)
- Race and law (135)
- Fifth Amendment (133)
- Corporations (126)
- Lawyers (122)
- Law professors (120)
- State courts (120)
- Federal courts (112)
- England (109)
- Interstate commerce (108)
- University of Michigan Law School (107)
- California (96)
- Competition (96)
- Racism (96)
- Clayton Act (95)
- Publication Year
- File Type
Articles 10261 - 10290 of 12806
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Torts - Contribution Between Joint Tortfeasors - Right Of Insurer To Contribution
Torts - Contribution Between Joint Tortfeasors - Right Of Insurer To Contribution
Michigan Law Review
One C negligently drove her car into an obstruction on the highway placed there by defendant. The accident occurred at night and the defendant had failed to place a light on the obstruction to indicate its presence to motorists. At the time of the accident M was a guest in C's car and suffered injuries as a result of the collision. Plaintiff, insurance carrier for C, settled with M for the injuries sustained and obtained a release covering the liability of all parties. Plaintiff as subrogee of C's rights brought the present action to recover contribution from …
Torts-Dangerous Instrumentalities -Attractive Nuisance
Torts-Dangerous Instrumentalities -Attractive Nuisance
Michigan Law Review
Defendant society procured an exhibition of fireworks on premises which were under its control and habitually used by children as a playground. The day after the exhibition the plaintiff, playing there with other children, picked up a bomb left by the defendant, and was injured when the bomb exploded. Held, defendant had a duty to those playing on the premises to use reasonable care to have the ground clear of dangerous articles after the exhibition. Spenzierato v. Society, (N. J. 1934) 169 Atl. 831.
Torts -Temporary Insanity As A Defense
Torts -Temporary Insanity As A Defense
Michigan Law Review
While operating a bus owned by the corporate defendant the individual defendant suddenly became insane and lost control of the bus which struck a parked ice truck owned by the plaintiff McKay, and upon which the plaintiff Sforza was chopping ice. These actions were brought to recover for property damage and personal injuries thereby incurred. Held, in spite of the temporary insanity the individual defendant was legally responsible for the negligence, which is imputable also to the corporate defendant. Sforza v. Green Bus Lines, Inc., et al; McKay v. Same, (Munic. Ct. City of New York, 1934) 268 …
Constitutional Law - Power To Enact Federal Securities Act Of 1933
Constitutional Law - Power To Enact Federal Securities Act Of 1933
Michigan Law Review
The scope and implications of the Securities Act of 1933 have been set out in a recent issue of this Review. Broadly, the Act regulates the issue and sale of securities by requiring registration thereof with the Federal Trade Commission, by specifying certain data to be included in prospectuses relating to such securities, and by imposing sanctions in the form of penal and civil liabilities. The Act purports to be an exercise of the Congressional power "to regulate . . . commerce among the several states" and "to establish post offices and post roads." Various constitutional questions are involved but …
Constitutional Law-Price-Fixing - Changing Attitudes
Constitutional Law-Price-Fixing - Changing Attitudes
Michigan Law Review
The urgent need for rebuilding and readjusting our economic system has forced the various governments to devise methods by which to achieve those ends. The legislative enactments resulting from the efforts to bring about a "recovery" are destined to be challenged on the due process ground. The public is keenly concerned not alone in the practicality of the methods selected, but in their constitutionality as well. The recent case of Nebbia v. People is not only of interest to the lawyer; it was accepted as "good copy" in leading lay publications. The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of one Nebbia, …
Federal Practice- Declaratory Judgments
Federal Practice- Declaratory Judgments
Michigan Law Review
Alabama, for the purpose of invoking original jurisdiction, applied to the Supreme Court of the United States for leave to file a complaint in equity against nineteen States to have statutes regulating and prohibiting the sale of goods manufactured by convict labor declared void because in violation of the commerce clause of the federal Constitution. Later, Alabama was allowed to submit an amendment eliminating fourteen States. Held, leave to file bill as amended denied. State of Alabama v. State of Arizona, et al., (U. S. 1934) 1 U. S. LAW WEEK (Feb. 6, 1934), index p. 468.
Landlord And Tenant - Liability Of A Mortgagee In Possession Of Mortgaged Leasehold For Rent
Landlord And Tenant - Liability Of A Mortgagee In Possession Of Mortgaged Leasehold For Rent
Michigan Law Review
On default of payments under a mortgage of a leasehold, the mortgagor and mortgagee agreed that the latter was to go into possession of the premises and manage them with a view to meeting the requirements of the mortgage. The mortgagor also executed a warranty deed of the premises to the mortgagee. On default of rent payments the landlord sued the mortgagee. Held, the defendant mortgagee was in possession merely as agent of the mortgagor and as such was not liable for the rent. Cleveland v. Detroit Trust Co., 264 Mich. 253, 249 N. W. 842 (1933).
Torts-Duty To Cut Weeds Around Oil Warehouse-Injury Caused By Occurrence Other Than That For Which Duty Was Raised
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff's house was located some 400 feet northeast of a wooden warehouse used by defendant for the storage of oils and grease. South and west of the warehouse lay a peet bog, and, between the bog and the defendant's ware. house and entirely on defendant's property was a 25-foot stretch of grass which defendant had neglected to cut down. A smouldering fire in the peet bog flared up under the influence of a strong wind, swept across the land of defendant, set fire to the warehouse and, eventually, crossed a full-width paved street and destroyed plaintiff's house. Held, though …
Minority Stockholders And The Amendment Of Corporate Charters, Edward O. Curran
Minority Stockholders And The Amendment Of Corporate Charters, Edward O. Curran
Michigan Law Review
Professor Dodd has remarked that "few branches of corporation law are in a more confused and unsatisfactory state than that relating to the right of minority stockholders to prevent amendments to the corporate charter, to which they have not given their assent, from becoming operative." One of the reasons for this confusion is the fact that some of the cases which still serve as precedents were decided at a time when it was not the usual practice to reserve the power to alter, amend, or repeal corporate charters. The principles of these early cases have been carried over and applied …
Federal Practice - Decision Of Questions Preliminary To The Convening Of A Three-Judge Court
Federal Practice - Decision Of Questions Preliminary To The Convening Of A Three-Judge Court
Michigan Law Review
Before the district judge can convene a three-judge court, two preliminary questions must be decided. First, is the case within the jurisdiction of the federal courts? Second, is the case one to which the three-judge statute applies?
Torts - Liability Of Parent For Acts Of Infant
Torts - Liability Of Parent For Acts Of Infant
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, nursemaid, engaged to look after defendant's young daughter, was bitten by the child. She sued the father for her in jury under Article 2318 of the Louisiana Civil Code. In the district court an exception of no cause of action (the equivalent of a general demurrer) was sustained. The exception was based mainly on the grounds that there was no allegation that the father could have prevented the tort; that there was no allegation that the child had previously exhibited a vicious temper, or that defendant had knowledge of such vicious temper; and that the nursemaid had assumed such …
Book Notes
Michigan Law Review
This department undertakes to list and, when possible, describe briefly current books on law and matters closely related thereto.
Front Matter, Michigan Law Review
Front Matter, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Front Matter for Volume 32, Issue 6 of Michigan Law Review
Segregation Of Residences Of Negroes, Arthur T. Martin
Segregation Of Residences Of Negroes, Arthur T. Martin
Michigan Law Review
Most white people do not want Negroes for neighbors. For many years this race prejudice alone seemed adequate to secure the type of domiciliary segregation which the majority desired. In recent years, however, Negro incursions into so-called white territory have become more numerous, and white landowners have resorted to legal devices to secure race exclusiveness in residential sections. In considering the validity of these segregation devices the courts have not ordinarily purported to take into account the social desirability of the end sought. No examination has been made of the factors back of Negro migration into white territory. No thought …
Organized Labor And The Recovery Act, Emmett B. Mcnatt
Organized Labor And The Recovery Act, Emmett B. Mcnatt
Michigan Law Review
The enactment of the National Industrial Recovery Act last June inevitably has brought to the fore a number of questions which as yet remain unanswered, including those connected with the application and interpretation of Section 7(a) of the Recovery Act, the subject of this article. Under this section, hailed by labor as a "new Magna Charta," employees are apparently given two interrelated rights - the right to organize with no discrimination against them by employers as a result thereof, and the right to collective bargaining through representatives of their own choosing. Employers are prohibited from interfering with such rights through …
Corporations - Right Of Minority Stockholders To Interfere In Corporate Management
Corporations - Right Of Minority Stockholders To Interfere In Corporate Management
Michigan Law Review
In determining the relationship between the majority and minority stockholders of a corporation, the courts are faced with the problem of striking a correct balance between the rights of the plaintiff stockholder, who alleges that he is being oppressed by the majority, and the rights of the majority, acting through the regular corporate machinery, who allege that the corporation is being harassed by a troublesome minority. It is necessary to protect the minority from the machinations of those in control; it is likewise necessary to protect the corporation, as controlled by the majority, from the blackmailer who holds a few …
Constitutional Law - Due Process - Fishing Rights In The Public Waters Of Michigan
Constitutional Law - Due Process - Fishing Rights In The Public Waters Of Michigan
Michigan Law Review
The Ne-Bo-Shone Association, Inc., is an Ohio corporation which owns property on both banks of the Pine River for some distance. Following the decision of the Michigan Supreme Court in Collins V. Gerhardt that the stream is navigable and public, the complainant association was ordered to remove obstructions in the stream which hampered the free use of the stream by the public for fishing purposes. Thereupon complainant sought an in junction against certain public officials from taking action to remove these obstructions, claiming that it has the right to exclude the public from this portion of the Pine River, and …
Insurance - Conditions Precedent To Existence Of Contract
Insurance - Conditions Precedent To Existence Of Contract
Michigan Law Review
The application for a non-medical-examination insurance policy, and the policy itself, contained the provision that the policy should not take effect if the insured should die before the date thereof or if, on such date, the insured should not be in sound health. At the time of delivery of the policy the insured was actually suffering from high blood pressure or heart disease, although this condition was unknown to him. A statute provided that the statements made in the application as to the physical condition of the insured should be valid and binding upon the insurance company "unless wilfully false …
Taxation-Federal Estates Tax-Joint Tenancies And Tenancies By The Entirety
Taxation-Federal Estates Tax-Joint Tenancies And Tenancies By The Entirety
Michigan Law Review
H and W acquired title to realty in Illinois in 1909 as joint tenants. H died in 1923. Held, that one-half of the value of this property should be included in the valuation of H's gross estate for purposes of the federal estates tax, per sec. 402 (d) of the Revenue Act of 1921. Griswold v. Helvering, Comm'r of Int. Rev., (U. S. 1933) 54 Sup. Ct. 5, 78 L. ed. 14.
Corporations - Duty Of Director To Stockholder On Stock Exchange Sales
Corporations - Duty Of Director To Stockholder On Stock Exchange Sales
Michigan Law Review
The recent case of Goodwin v. Agassiz presents the problem of the duty owed by a director to existing and prospective stockholders in its most typical and difficult form. The defendants were president and general manager, respectively, as well as directors of the Cliff Mining Corporation which owned mineral lands in Northern Michigan. The stock of the corporation was listed on the Boston Stock Exchange. The defendants in their capacity of directors had knowledge of a geologist's report which forecast possible existence of copper deposits in the corporation's lands. The defendants were also directors of another mining corporation owning lands …
Carriers -Airplanes - Right To Limit Liability By Contract
Carriers -Airplanes - Right To Limit Liability By Contract
Michigan Law Review
Defendant corporation conducted a regular airplane passenger service between Miami and Tampa, Florida. Deceased purchased an ordinary passenger ticket at the regular price and, in the course of the trip, was killed due to the negligence of defendant's pilot. There was a stipulation in the ticket which all passengers were required to sign that "the company's liability is limited to $10,000." Wife of deceased sued for the negligent death and recovered a judgment in excess of $10,000. Held, that defendant was a common carrier, and, therefore, could not compel a passenger to release it of its legal liability. Curtis-Wright …
Practice And Procedure - Joinder Of Parties And Causes Under The Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act
Practice And Procedure - Joinder Of Parties And Causes Under The Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff sought, in one suit, to recover the amount of a promissory note from the maker and to attack a transfer of property by the maker to her brother, alleged to be a fraud on the maker's creditors. The maker and transferee were made defendants. The transferee demurred to the complaint on the ground that the two defendants had essentially different liabilities and so could not be joined in one action, under the South Dakota code. Held, that section 9 of the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act permits the plaintiff to proceed in one action for a judgment on …
Highways - Underpass As Highway Use
Highways - Underpass As Highway Use
Michigan Law Review
The defendant was the owner of a gravel pit, separated from his railway shipping facilities by a highway, the fee of a portion of which was owned by the plaintiff. A bill was filed to restrain the construction under the highway of a passageway between the railroad and the gravel pit, permission for which construction had been granted by the state highway commissioner. The bill was dismissed, and on appeal, held, by an evenly-divided court, that the judgment be affirmed. Grand Rapids Gravel Co. v. William J. Breen Gravel Co., 262 Mich. 365, 247 N. W. 902 (1933).
Torts - Negligence - Liability For Damages Accruing To Another By Act Done To Save One's Own Property
Michigan Law Review
Defendant was negligent in allowing a wooden barge to be loaded with crude oil without adequate fire protection. After the ship had been set afire by lightning, defendant had it cast adrift to save its wharf from destruction. The floating vessel later damaged plaintiff's property two miles distant. Held, defendant committed an actionable wrong. Swan-Finch Oil Corp. et al. v. Warner-Quinlan Co., (N. J. 1933) 167 Atl. 211.
Book Notes
Michigan Law Review
This department undertakes to list and, when possible, describe briefly current books on law and matters closely related thereto.
Bankruptcy - Proof Of Claims For Unaccrued Rent
Bankruptcy - Proof Of Claims For Unaccrued Rent
Michigan Law Review
In the very recent case of Manhattan Properties, Inc. v. Irving Trust Co., the Supreme Court for the first time authoritatively passed on the validity of a claim in bankruptcy by a lessor against the bankrupt estate for loss of future rents due after the filing of the petition. The Court, affirming the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals, ruled that the landlord's claim was not provable. Mr. Justice Roberts, delivering the opinion of the Court, reviewed the long history of litigation on the subject and was impressed by the fact that although the great majority of the …
Corporations - Attacks On Salaries Paid To Corporate Executives
Corporations - Attacks On Salaries Paid To Corporate Executives
Michigan Law Review
In October, 1933, the former president and chairman of the governing board of one of the world's greatest banks appeared before the Senate Committee on Banking and Currency, in Washington. During the course of the testimony, it was revealed that through the years 1929-33 this executive had received from his bank upwards of $1,100,000 in salary, bonus, and extra compensation. For the two years immediately past, he had served as a director in fifty-nine other corporations, from one of which he had at one time received a salary of $40,000 a year for services as director only, and from another …
Contracts-Wagers - New Consideration
Contracts-Wagers - New Consideration
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff and defendant were engaged in illegal stock transactions at the end of which plaintiff owed defendant $11,961.05 and defendant owed plaintiff $7,600.00. In making out the check for his debt, plaintiff deducted for the $7,600.00 and wanted to give only $4,361.05 because defendant's check for the former sum, although it had been mailed, had not yet cleared. On defendant's assurance that the check would clear and be paid, plaintiff added $7,600.00 to the check which he gave to the defendant. Defendant promptly cashed plaintiff's check and stopped payment on his own. In a suit for the $7,600, to which …
Criminal Law And Procedure - Repeal Of Statute - Eighteenth Amendment
Criminal Law And Procedure - Repeal Of Statute - Eighteenth Amendment
Michigan Law Review
Defendants Chambers and Gibson were indicted on June 5, 1933, for conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act, and for possessing and transporting liquor in violation of the Act. Chambers pleaded guilty, and the case was continued to the December term. The case was called for trial as to Gibson on December 6, 1933. Chambers filed a plea in abatement, and Gibson demurred to the indictment. Held, the repeal of the Eighteenth Amendment, by the adoption of the Twenty-first, proclaimed December 5, 1933, barred further prosecution. United States v. Chambers and Gibson, (U.S. Sup. Ct. 1934) 1 U.S. …
Banks And Banking - Public Moneys As Preferred Claims
Banks And Banking - Public Moneys As Preferred Claims
Michigan Law Review
The State claims a preference in the assets of an insolvent bank on the basis of sovereign prerogative. Held, that the State has no preference now because the prerogative right has been abrogated: first, by the passing of a comprehensive state banking law; and second, by a constitutional provision giving bill holders of insolvent banks preference in payment over all other creditors. Fry, State Treasurer v. Equitable Trust Co., 264 Mich. 165, 249 N. W. 619 (1933). (Potter and McDonald, JJ., dissenting).