Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (7564)
- Constitutional Law (1304)
- State and Local Government Law (745)
- Supreme Court of the United States (707)
- Courts (658)
-
- Legislation (633)
- Legal History (583)
- Torts (577)
- Legal Writing and Research (563)
- Criminal Law (483)
- Contracts (479)
- Labor and Employment Law (448)
- Property Law and Real Estate (425)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (405)
- Law and Society (384)
- Administrative Law (367)
- Estates and Trusts (364)
- Business Organizations Law (355)
- Evidence (340)
- Jurisdiction (309)
- Criminal Procedure (303)
- Securities Law (298)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (297)
- Commercial Law (296)
- Litigation (285)
- Law and Race (270)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (264)
- Fourteenth Amendment (263)
- Law and Economics (257)
- First Amendment (250)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (350)
- History (208)
- Book reviews (201)
- Treatises (189)
- Publications (181)
-
- Constitution (156)
- Liability (156)
- Judicial review (140)
- Law reform (140)
- Negligence (137)
- Due process (136)
- Regulation (136)
- Michigan (128)
- Race and law (126)
- Fraud (120)
- Corporations (115)
- Lawyers (111)
- State courts (110)
- Federal courts (101)
- Fifth Amendment (98)
- New York (95)
- Racism (89)
- Women (81)
- Competition (80)
- Law professors (80)
- England (79)
- Federalism (78)
- Gender and law (77)
- Freedom of speech (76)
- Public policy (76)
- Publication Year
Articles 7591 - 7620 of 8523
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Arbitration Under The Modern Statutes
Arbitration Under The Modern Statutes
Michigan Law Review
Of late years the way of the "fair and free trial in open court," to which every man is deemed to have an inalienable right, has become so long, devious, intricate and costly, that the law faces the danger of falling into general disrepute. The calendars of courts in most jurisdictions ·are crowded and filled for months and years in advance. the situation being most acute in the larger cities and commercial centers. the very places where delays are most undesirable. New York City serves as a horrible example-here an ordinary case generally takes three years to come to trial. …
Redemption From Foreclosure Sale--The Uniform Mortgage Act, Edgar Noble Durfee, Delmar W. Doddridge
Redemption From Foreclosure Sale--The Uniform Mortgage Act, Edgar Noble Durfee, Delmar W. Doddridge
Michigan Law Review
If it be objected that our proposal is wholly novel and that it is the function of the Uniform Act merely to codify existing law, changing it only in so far as is necessary to remove conflicting rules, we would answer that codification in a strict sense is impossible in a field which presents so many conflicting views as that before us. We also believe that the objection is less forceful when the existing law is wholly statutory and half our states have no such law. And we understand that the commissioners have more and more abandoned the strict ideal …
Proof Of Good Faith, Jason L. Honigman
Proof Of Good Faith, Jason L. Honigman
Michigan Law Review
Section 59 of the Uniform Negotiable Instruments Law provides, that, "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired the title as holder in due course. But the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound on the instrument prior to the acquisition of such defective title." Numerous questions of interpretation have arisen in …
Search Of Automobile Without Warrant--When Reasonable
Search Of Automobile Without Warrant--When Reasonable
Michigan Law Review
The enforcement of the National Prohibition Act has been responsible for raising the search and seizure question to a new height of importance. By Section 26 of that act, any officer discovering any person in the transportation of intoxicating liquors is to seize all such liquors being transported contrary to law. Obviously to secure a search warrant is impossible in the very nature of things the automobile, adapted to speed, is gone long before a warrant could be secured. And the employment of the automobile in the transportation of liquor is carried to such an extent that search and seizure …
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
The United States And The Mandates, Quincy Wright
The United States And The Mandates, Quincy Wright
Michigan Law Review
Although the United States has not yet become a member of the League of Nations nor burdened itself with any responsibilities in regard to the mandatory system established by that instrument for the government of former German and Turkish colonies, nevertheless (1) American influence was all important in gaining acceptance of the system by the Paris Peace Conference. (2) American influence was again felt in the process of putting the system into practical operation. (3) Finally the right of America to influence the future operation of the mandates irrespective of her ultimate relation to the League of Nations has been …
Prohibition And The Doctrine Of The Weeks Case, Thomas E. Atkinson
Prohibition And The Doctrine Of The Weeks Case, Thomas E. Atkinson
Michigan Law Review
One of the most disputed present day questions is whether evidence obtained in violation of constitutional guarantees against unreasonable searches and seizures should be admissible. The case of Weeks v. United States is perhaps the leading authority upon the proposition that evidence procured by officers through unreasonable search is not admissible. The holding may be justified upon how theories, vis., (1) that the admission of the evidence substantially violates the rule against self-incrimination in the Fifth Amendment, (2) that the exclusion of the evidence is the only practical means of enforcing the guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
The Judicial Review Of Executive Acts, Albert Levitt
The Judicial Review Of Executive Acts, Albert Levitt
Michigan Law Review
The relation of the judiciary to the executive branch of the Government is a perplexing one. According to the Constitution, the government of the United States is threefold in character, legislative, executive and judicial. Each of these is supposed to be independent of the others. One cannot usurp the function of any one of the others. At the same time, this is a "Government of laws and not of men." It is equally true that this is a government of laws and not of political subdivisions or of the subdivisions of governmental mechanisms. Legislators, executives and judiciary must abide by …
Graduate Study In Law At Michigan
Graduate Study In Law At Michigan
Michigan Law Review
A notable advance in the organization of graduate study in law at Michigan has been achieved recently in the approval by the Board of Regents of a new program prepared and submitted by the Law Faculty. The program is the result of several years of experimentation and study. The word "program'', indeed, should not be permitted to give a false impression. In substantial measure the recent action only approves a new and more adequate description of such advanced work in law as the Law School is not only now prepared to offer but is actually offering for a limited class …
War Crimes, Elbridge Colby
War Crimes, Elbridge Colby
Michigan Law Review
Grant that as far as military jurisdictions are concerned, the superior order justifies the act of the subordinate. Yet is such a judgment valid outside of military circles? Grant that public armed troops and soldiers have generally been held exempt when acting under the orders of their sovereign, and are responsible only to their own government. Is this an absolute protection? Is it true that, by the authority vested in him, "the commanding general determines what measures are necessary unless restrained by the orders of his government, which alone is his superior." Are there no qualifications to the idea that …
Conflict Of Laws Rules As Constitutional Limitations
Conflict Of Laws Rules As Constitutional Limitations
Michigan Law Review
With the constant growth of the United States as a commercial nation, it has been inevitable that state lines should figure in business transactions to an ever diminishing extent. Business relations, keeping pace with the rapid development of modem means of transportation, have increasingly assumed an interstate aspect. With this extension of commercial dealings, the question of the legal rights of the parties so engaged has frequently arisen. Diversity of local rules of law has led to much litigation and disagreement. Differences in local rules might be overcome through the services of competent commercial lawyers, and contracts might then be …
Torts-Use Of Force To Expel Trespassers-Defences
Torts-Use Of Force To Expel Trespassers-Defences
Michigan Law Review
One of the most elementary and fundamental principles of the law of torts is that one in the lawful possession of premises may remove trespassers therefrom, using therefor so much force as is reasonably necessary. This is but a correlative of the right of an owner to have the free and undisturbed possession of his premises. The enunciation of this universally accepted rule furnishes a starting point, or basis, for an answer to the query, what is reasonable force? There can be no doubt as to the owner's liability for excessive or unreasonable force employed in ejecting a trespasser. Emmons …
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
Irresistible Impulse And Criminal Liability, John Barker Waite
Irresistible Impulse And Criminal Liability, John Barker Waite
Michigan Law Review
Do you believe in free-will, or mechanistic determinism, or fore-ordination, or fatalism? What do you mean by 'irresistible impulse'? What is the purpose of this prosecution against which you advocate, or deny, irresistible impulse as a defense; and just what do you mean by 'defense'? If, instead of one question, "is irresistible impulse a defense", we should ask these other questions of counsel, judge and medical expert, how often would their answers be in accord? Yet the one question can never be intelligently discussed in the absence of certainty and agreement as to the other premises. There are certain combinations …
War Crimes, Elbridge Colby
War Crimes, Elbridge Colby
Michigan Law Review
It is not necessary to enumerate exactly what may now be considered war crimes or violations of the laws of war. The list will change from time to time, by the addition of new offences and the omission of those now so considered. Most of the Hague Conventions and rules and regulations are sufficiently well furnished with the signatures of world wide plenipotentiaries and adequately ratified to insure of their being accepted as international law on the points covered. There are only a few exceptions. In general the precepts are valid. Indeed, most modern writers on international law, when they …
Admiralty-The Effect Of Ths Supreme Court's Interpretation Of The Lien Act Of 1910
Admiralty-The Effect Of Ths Supreme Court's Interpretation Of The Lien Act Of 1910
Michigan Law Review
Prior to the Lien Act of June 23, 1910, there was great confusion among the district courts over the question of the presumption of credit. The General Smith, 4 Wheaton 438, had held that though a lien was given to the furnisher of a foreign ship, the furnisher of a domestic ship got no lien unless the municipal law of the place gave him one. The states all passed various kinds of statutes giving material-men liens and these liens were enforced in admiralty. When the situation became unbearable Congress passed the Lien Act of 1910 to clarify the law. …
Justification For Inducing Breach Of Contract
Justification For Inducing Breach Of Contract
Michigan Law Review
Liability for inducing breach of contract, though of comparatively recent development in the field of torts, has grown so rapidly and with so little method or system in many decisions, that courts are somewhat anxious to find legitimate theories for checking the wholesale recoveries resulting from the application of the general principle. Justification for the tort shows some promise of being one of the checks for which the courts have been searching. The recent English case of Brimelow v. Casson (Aug. 1294) 93 L. J. Rep. 256, sheds some light on the problem of justification. In that case the plaintiff …
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
Distinction Between Governmental And Proprietary Functions Of Municipal Corporations, Delmar W. Doddridge
Distinction Between Governmental And Proprietary Functions Of Municipal Corporations, Delmar W. Doddridge
Michigan Law Review
There are many places in the law where the making of a distinction has resulted in a difficulty in application that has greatly increased litigation, but there are few places where this is more true than in the distinction made between the governmental and the proprietary functions of municipal corporations. The distinction has taken a firm grip upon the law of municipal corporations and seems well settled, although its propriety as applied to particular subjects may be doubted. The terminology of the distinction is in itself productive of doubt, the function or duty in the one branch being denominated "governmental", …
Legislation And Judicial Decision, Rudolf Stammler
Legislation And Judicial Decision, Rudolf Stammler
Michigan Law Review
The discussions of the theme indicated by the title usually start from Montesquieu's theory of the three powers. This famous doctrine is developed in his work "De 1' esprit des lois" (1748) Bk. II, Ch. 6. This chapter is entitled "Of the English Constitution". It discusses however all states in general. In every state there are three sorts of powers, the legislative authority, the executive authority in matters dependent upon the law of nations, and the executive authority in everything dependent upon civil law. The last Montesquieu calls the judicial power, while the one mentioned in the second place is …
Conflict Of Laws-Testamentary Trusts
Conflict Of Laws-Testamentary Trusts
Michigan Law Review
The rules of conflict of laws are, in many instances, in chaotic condition. Particularly is this true in parts of the law applying to trusts of personal property created by will. When the domicile of the testator, the place of execution of the will, the residence of the trustees, and the trust estate are all in the same jurisdiction, it is evident that the law of that state will control. But when the domiciles of the trustees and the testator differ, or when the trust estate is in a foreign land, we are presented with our specific problem of the …
Constitutional Law-Restricting Liberty Without Due Process Of Law-Extorted Confessions
Constitutional Law-Restricting Liberty Without Due Process Of Law-Extorted Confessions
Michigan Law Review
Of recent years the administration of criminal justice has increased many-fold, owing to the constantly increasing size of our great cities and the period of growing social unrest in which we find ourselves. Public opinion has demanded a more effective mode of dealing with those who break the law with seeming impunity. In view of this attitude it is only natural that in a particularly baffling crime the police should seek to obtain some clue of the criminals by grilling suspects. This has resulted in many cases in acts which to say the least are over-zealous. In a recent case …
Crimes-Arrest-Reasonable Cause To Believe
Crimes-Arrest-Reasonable Cause To Believe
Michigan Law Review
The admission of evidence was objected to, in a recent case, on the ground that it had been illegally secured. Officers had arrested the defendant without a warrant, on a charge of illegally transporting liquor. He was in fact guilty of the offense for which arrested, but contended that the evidence secured by the arrest could not be used. The circuit court of appeals phrased the issue thus : ''Was there probable cause for the officers to believe (that the felony was being committed), or were the facts sufficient to give rise merely to a suspicion thereof? If the former, …
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.