Digital Commons Network^™

Do Anti-Tax Shelter Rules Make Sense? A Reply To Professor Johnson, Lawrence A. Zelenak

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Notice-And-Comment Rights For Administrative Decisions Affecting International Trade: Heightened Need, No Response, William Araiza

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Nationwide Personal Jurisdiction In All Federal Question Cases: A New Rule 4 Note, Howard M. Erichson

Faculty Scholarship

Every litigator who remembers first year civil procedure knows that the personal jurisdiction1 of federal courts is limited by state territorial boundaries. That limitation, however, may soon disappear in federal question cases. A new rule of civil procedure, currently under consideration by the federal rulemakers, would provide for nationwide service of process in all federal question cases. The proposed rule would profoundly affect forum selection in the federal courts. This Note argues in favor of the adoption of the new Rule 4's nationwide personal jurisdiction provision. Not only would the new Rule 4 be a legitimate exercise of authority, but …

On The Nature Of Bankruptcy: An Essay Of Bankruptcy Sharing And The Creditor's Bargain, Thomas H. Jackson, Robert E. Scott

Faculty Scholarship

Finance theorists have long recognized that bankruptcy is a key component in any general theory of the capital structure of business entities. Legal theorists have been similarly sensitive to the substantial allocational and distributional effects of the bankruptcy law. Nevertheless, until recently, underlying justifications for the bankruptcy process have not been widely studied. Bankruptcy scholars have been content to recite, without critical analysis, the two normative objectives of bankruptcy: rehabilitation of overburdened debtors and equality of treatment for creditors and other claimants.

The developing academic interest in legal theory has spurred a corresponding interest in expanding the theoretical foundations of …

Facing Up: A Reply, Joseph Raz

Faculty Scholarship

We are all familiar with the peculiar feeling of coming across one's past objectified, as when one overhears others telling how they perceived a certain event in which one played the hero's role. Reading the contributions to this issue was a bit like that. In particular, it made me realise how I have abused the tolerant paper by writing all too much, while leaving so many hostages to fortune, so many loose ends, and expressing so many half-baked ideas. It is also embarrassing because it is like a summons to the confessional, to repent my sins of omission and commission, …

Some Comments On Professor Neuborne's Paper, Henry Paul Monaghan

Faculty Scholarship

It is a pleasure to have the opportunity to comment upon Professor Neuborne's paper; it is a provoking effort to make sense out of important aspects of the first amendment. At the outset, I should say that there is much in the paper with which I agree. But for the purposes of this essay I will focus on points of disagreement.

Professor Neuborne's specific focus is an analysis of the Security and Exchange Commission's (SEC) regulation of speech. The final twenty-one pages of his paper are directly concerned with analysis and criticism of the existing case law on the subject. …

Exchange, Contract And Law In The Stone Age, Joseph Perillo

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Teaching Mediation As A Lawyering Role Developments, Jacqueline Nolan-Haley

Faculty Scholarship

The growth of the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) movement has generated an increased interest in the study and practice of mediation as a nonadversarial method of conflict resolution. With mediation, individuals settle their disputes using a neutral third party who has no power to impose a settlement. Historically, mediation has been widely neglected in legal education, and-except for those involved in the labor field-lawyers have not practiced it. Recent gains in visibility have not necessarily resulted in widespread acceptance of mediation. In fact, mediation has even been openly resisted by some members of the legal profession.

Static And Dynamic Scaling Relationships In The Light Scattering Properties Of Polystyrenes In Good Solvents, Mamta Bhatt, Alexander M. Jamieson, Rolfe G. Petschek

Faculty Scholarship

Static light scattering measurements are reported on narrow molecular weight distribution polystyrenes (Mw = 3.84 × 106) in the four good solvents, ethylbenzene, benzene, toluene, and tetrahydrofuran at 25°C. These data are plotted in a "scaling" form to directly compare the equilibrium structure factor of identical polystyrene samples in the different solvent systems. The results in tetrahydrofuran are clearly distinct from those in the aromatic solvents and apparently suggest that THF is a thermodynamically better solvent. These distinctions between our results for identical, high molecular weight polymer samples in different good solvents demonstrate that these molecular weights are not high …

Charleston Policy: Substance Or Abuse, The , Kimani Paul-Emile

Faculty Scholarship

In 1989, the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) adopted a policy that, according to subjective criteria, singled out for drug testing, certain women who sought prenatal care and childbirth services would be tested for prohibited substances. Women who tested positive were arrested, incarcerated and prosecuted for crimes ranging from misdemeanor substance possession to felony substance distribution to a minor. In this Article, the Author argues that by intentionally targeting indigent Black women for prosecution, the MUSC Policy continued the United States legacy of their systematic oppression and resulted in the criminalizing of Black Motherhood.

The Uniform Rules On The Liability Of Operators Of Transport Terminals, Joseph Sweeney

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Restricting The Flow Of Asylum-Seekers In Belgium, Denmark, The Federal Republic Of Germany, And The Netherlands: New Challenges To The Geneva Convention Relating To The Status Of Refugees And The European Convention On Human Rights, Maryellen Fullerton

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Punishment: The Civil Perspective Of Punitive Damages, Bailey Kuklin

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Grammar Of Advice And Consent: Senate Confirmation Of Supreme Court Nominees, Madeline Morris

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Rebuilding Of Duke University's Law School, 1925-1947, Part 1, Robert F. Durden

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Judges, Lawyers And The Penalty Of Death, Michael E. Tigar

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

"Willfulness" And "Ignorance" In Federal Criminal Law, Michael E. Tigar

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Through A Glass, Darkly: How The Court Sees Motions To Disqualify Criminal Defense Lawyers , Bruce A. Green

Faculty Scholarship

Although raised frequently in the lower courts, the question of what the trial judge's role is in conflict-of-interest cases has, for nearly half a century, lurked in the background of the Supreme Court's decisions concerning the scope of a criminal defendant's right to the undivided loyalty of his attorney. Last term, as its conflict-of-interest jurisprudence reached middle age, the Court had the opportunity to articulate its views on that question. In Wheat v. United States, the Court held that a trial judge has discretion to disqualify defense counsel, even over the defendant's objection, if a serious possibility for a conflict …

Qualified Immunity In Section 1983 Cases: The Unanswered Questions, Kit Kinports

Faculty Scholarship

Part I of this Article describes the general policies underlying qualified immunity and the Court's decisions defining the scope of the defense. Part II then addresses two answered questions concerning Harlow v. Fitzgerald's impact on the substantive content of the qualified immunity defense: Is immunity available to the defendant who actually knows that her conduct is infringing the plaintiff's constitutional rights, even if the law governing those rights is not yet clearly established? And should a court take into account the nature of the defendant's governmental responsibilities and other circumstances surrounding her conduct in determining whether the right she …

Deconstructing Gender, Joan C. Williams

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Authority In The Dock, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Life After Foley: The Bottom Line, David Jung, Richard Harkness

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Completing Equity's Conquest? Reflections On The Future Of Trial Under The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Richard L. Marcus

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Enforcement Of Arbitration Agreements In Securities Fraud Disputes, Robert A. Lusardi

Faculty Scholarship

In this Article, the Author discusses the Supreme Court's increased willingness in recent years to rely on the arbitral process for the resolution of securities disputes, and its willingness to enforce pre-dispute arbitration agreements under the Arbitration Act.

Foreword: The Economics Of Contract Law, Michael J. Meurer

Faculty Scholarship

The articles in this issue are samples from the burgeoning economics of contract law. They demonstrate that lawyers a can bring economic models to bear on quite specific issues of co offer normative guidance regarding the structure of efficient The success of the symposium and the quality of the articles of this field will continue to flourish. The articles cover a fairly narrow range of contract law issues. The second through sixth articles all address topics involving remedies. Two of these loo at the optimal remedies to be provided by contract law, and the other three are concerned with remedies …

Evaluating Child Care Legislation: Program Structures And Political Consequences, Lance Liebman

Faculty Scholarship

The American political system is not good at choosing among worthy goals and then adopting programs well designed to achieve the desired purposes. Scholars and activists continue to debate the success and failure of the last quarter century of efforts to reduce inequality and achieve other social reforms. But we have no well developed methodology for evaluating proposed programs and attempting to predict their likely consequences.

This Article asks what we know about choosing legal structures for programmatic efforts that seek social change. In particular, it asks whether we can predict relationships between different ways of pursuing public ends and …

The Constitution's Accommodation Of Social Change, Philip A. Hamburger

Faculty Scholarship

Did the framers and ratifiers of the United States Constitution think that changes in American society would require changes in the text or interpretation of the Constitution? If those who created the Constitution understood or even anticipated the possibility of major social alterations, how did they expect constitutional law – text and interpretation – to accommodate such developments?

Book Review - A Guide To Legal Research In Virginia (Edited By John D. Eure), Steven D. Hinckley

Faculty Scholarship

Review of A Guide to Legal Research in Virginia, edited by John D. Eure. Charlottesville, VA: Committee on Continuing Legal Education, Virginia Law Foundation, 1989.

Privacy And The Regulation Of The New Reproductive Technologies: A Decision-Making Approach, Antoinette M. Sedillo Lopez

Faculty Scholarship

This article maps out the territory that must be explored in this very complex area and analyzes the implications of governmental regulation of the new reproductive technology. It suggests that the central issue for analysis is the extent to which authority to make decisions concerning reproductive potential should be allocated to individuals rather than to the government. The article describes approaches to allocating decision-making authority with respect to procreative issues. The first is a rights-based approach which emphasizes individual autonomy; this approach will not permit governmental regulation which interferes with personal autonomy in decision making, at least without good reason. …

Is Law Politics?, Philip Chase Bobbitt

Faculty Scholarship

Red, White, and Blue addresses the pervasive presence of five general theories of American constitutional law. These theories reflect particular jurisprudential ideologies governing, among other things, the legitimacy of certain arguments, the appropriateness of certain occasions for judicial intervention and the constitutional basis for judicial review. What makes this book interesting and important is that it provides an unwitting or at least unself-conscious example of the general theorizing it wishes to explain. For this reason, its descriptions of the particular family of theories that characterize American constitutional jurisprudence are distorted, while it disclaims any account of the particular set of …