Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (3826)
- Criminal Law (431)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (343)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (301)
- Constitutional Law (261)
-
- Family Law (256)
- Law and Society (244)
- Criminal Procedure (243)
- Health Law and Policy (227)
- Law and Gender (221)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (202)
- Legal Education (193)
- Other Law (171)
- Law and Race (169)
- Law and Economics (143)
- Legal Profession (132)
- Business Organizations Law (131)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (124)
- Juvenile Law (118)
- Evidence (114)
- Law and Philosophy (112)
- Law and Politics (111)
- Intellectual Property Law (109)
- Contracts (108)
- Courts (106)
- Jurisprudence (106)
- Arts and Humanities (103)
- Legal Writing and Research (97)
- Banking and Finance Law (95)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (95)
- Institution
-
- Columbia Law School (776)
- Boston University School of Law (512)
- Duke Law (474)
- Brooklyn Law School (422)
- UC Law SF (359)
-
- Texas A&M University School of Law (325)
- Case Western Reserve University (317)
- Fordham Law School (283)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (192)
- Lindenwood University (129)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (128)
- California Western School of Law (127)
- University of New Mexico (127)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (111)
- Western New England University (80)
- Nova Southeastern University (66)
- Barry University School of Law (58)
- Brigham Young University Law School (50)
- Widener University Commonwealth Law School (27)
- Belmont University (22)
- James Madison University (16)
- Colby College (7)
- Lesley University (7)
- University of San Diego (6)
- Otterbein University (2)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (2)
- University of Louisiana at Lafayette (2)
- University of Southern Maine (2)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- Wofford College (1)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (91)
- SSRN (76)
- Discrimination (56)
- Race (56)
- Constitutional law (55)
-
- Artificial intelligence (54)
- Columbia Law Review (53)
- Legal education (52)
- Privacy (50)
- Civil rights (49)
- Law (47)
- Corporate governance (44)
- Copyright (38)
- Criminal justice (38)
- Family law (38)
- Evidence (35)
- Criminal procedure (33)
- Gender (32)
- Ethics (31)
- Supreme Court (31)
- Immigration (30)
- International law (30)
- Jurisprudence (30)
- Contracts (29)
- Domestic relations (28)
- Human rights (28)
- Courts (27)
- Legal ethics (27)
- Mediation (27)
- Child welfare (26)
- Publication Year
- File Type
Articles 3511 - 3540 of 4631
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
When Two Become One: Views On Fletcher's "Two Patterns Of Criminality", Deborah W. Denno
When Two Become One: Views On Fletcher's "Two Patterns Of Criminality", Deborah W. Denno
Faculty Scholarship
George Fletcher's Rethinking Criminal Law (“Rethinking”) is the ultimate cut-to-the-chase treatise. The book does not belabor the frailties of existing criminal law, but rather predicts an overhaul of much of its doctrine. This essay marks a tribute to Rethinking's influence by examining two of the book's well known “patterns of criminality”: (1) “manifest criminality,” which proposes that crimes are acts that any “objective” observer would clearly recognize as illegal without knowing anything about the mental state of the person committing those acts, and, in stark contrast, (2) “subjective criminality,” which suggests that crimes are consciously intended and experienced only by …
Experimental Simulations And Tort Reform: Avoidance, Error And Overreaching In Sunstein Et Al.’S ‘Punitive Damages’, Neil Vidmar
Experimental Simulations And Tort Reform: Avoidance, Error And Overreaching In Sunstein Et Al.’S ‘Punitive Damages’, Neil Vidmar
Faculty Scholarship
This article addresses tort reform claims made in Cass R. Sunstein, et al.'s Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide (2002)and related articles, research that was largely underwritten by the Exxon Corporation. Based upon a series of simulation experiments, those authors have made a general claim that juries are incapable of making coherent judgments about punitive damages. In this article I raise serious methodological problems bearing on the validity of the research, and, therefore, its ability to provide judges and legislators with useful information about juries and punitive damages.
Rethinking The Disclosure Paradigm In A World Of Complexity, Steven L. Schwarcz
Rethinking The Disclosure Paradigm In A World Of Complexity, Steven L. Schwarcz
Faculty Scholarship
In a prior article, Professor Schwarcz examined the factors that differentiate Enron's questionable use of off-balance sheet special purpose entities, (SPEs) from the trillions of dollars of "legitimate" securitization and other structured-finance transactions that use SPEs. The presence of meaningful differences, Professor Schwarcz argued, may inform regulatory schemes by providing a basis to distinguish which such transactions should be allowed or restricted. In that connection, Professor Schwarcz encountered the dilemma that some structured transactions are so complex that disclosure to investors of the company originating the transaction is necessarily imperfect - either oversimplifying the transaction, or providing detail and sophistication …
Gaining/Losing Perspective On The Law, Or Keeping Digital Evidence In Perspective, Christopher J. Buccafusco
Gaining/Losing Perspective On The Law, Or Keeping Digital Evidence In Perspective, Christopher J. Buccafusco
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Fear Assessment: Cost-Benefit Analysis And The Pricing Of Fear And Anxiety, Matthew D. Adler
Fear Assessment: Cost-Benefit Analysis And The Pricing Of Fear And Anxiety, Matthew D. Adler
Faculty Scholarship
Risk assessment is now a common feature of regulatory practice, but fear assessment is not. In particular, environmental, health and safety agencies such as EPA, FDA, OSHA, NHTSA, and CPSC, commonly count death, illness and injury as costs for purposes of cost-benefit analysis, but almost never incorporate fear, anxiety or other welfare-reducing mental states into the analysis. This is puzzling, since fear and anxiety are welfare setbacks, and since the very hazards regulated by these agencies - air or water pollutants, toxic waste dumps, food additives and contaminants, workplace toxins and safety threats, automobiles, dangerous consumer products, radiation, and so …
Business As Usual? Brown And The Continuing Conundrum Of Race In America, Robert S. Chang, Jerome M. Culp Jr.
Business As Usual? Brown And The Continuing Conundrum Of Race In America, Robert S. Chang, Jerome M. Culp Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
To Be Brown In Brazil: Education And Segregation Latin American Style Colloquium - Relearning Brown: Applying The Lessons Of Brown To The Challenges Of The Twenty-First Century, Tanya K. Hernandez
To Be Brown In Brazil: Education And Segregation Latin American Style Colloquium - Relearning Brown: Applying The Lessons Of Brown To The Challenges Of The Twenty-First Century, Tanya K. Hernandez
Faculty Scholarship
As a scholar who studies civil rights movements from a comparative perspective, the commemoration of the fiftieth anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education1 decision causes me to query the power of Brown as a symbol of equality outside of the United States. Because there is a larger community of African descendants living in Latin America and the Caribbean than there is in the United States, examining the role of Brown in Latin America and the Caribbean is particularly worthwhile. Furthermore, focusing on the Latin American and Caribbean contexts is also relevant due to the significant influence of the …
Causation In Antidiscrimination Law: Beyond Intent Versus Impact , Sheila R. Foster
Causation In Antidiscrimination Law: Beyond Intent Versus Impact , Sheila R. Foster
Faculty Scholarship
Antidiscrimination law and scholarship have long been engaged in the debate over whether a discriminatory intent or disparate impact test best captures the type of discrimination the law should, or can, prohibit. This Article suggests that we move beyond this dichotomous debate and focus instead on how courts reason about discrimination cases brought under both the intent and impact doctrines. This Article identifies a distinct pattern, or framework, in the way courts reason about discrimination in both types of cases that defies neat doctrinal labels. reasoning process, which I shorthandedly refer to as "causation," is at the heart of evidentiary …
Understanding The Mark: Race, Stigma, And Equality In Context, Robin A. Lenhardt
Understanding The Mark: Race, Stigma, And Equality In Context, Robin A. Lenhardt
Faculty Scholarship
In its Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence, the Supreme Court regards intentional discrimination as the principal source of racial injury in the United States. In this Article, R.A. Lenhardt argues that racial stigma, not intentional discrimination, constitutes the main source of racial harm and that courts must take the social science insight that most racialized conduct or thought is unconscious, rather than intentional, into account in their constitutional analyses of acts or policies challenged on the grounds of race. Drawing on the social science work of Erving Goffman and the ground-breaking work of Charles H. Lawrence, Professor Lenhardt argues that courts should …
Parks As Gyms? Recreational Paradigms And Public Health In The National Parks, Jay D. Wexler
Parks As Gyms? Recreational Paradigms And Public Health In The National Parks, Jay D. Wexler
Faculty Scholarship
When scholars and policymakers think about the relationship between public health and environmental law and policy, they likely think first about controlling pollution and other toxic substances. As other articles have amply demonstrated, water pollution, air pollution, and other environmental toxins can have significant deleterious effects on the public's health. Scholars rightly pay serious attention to these relationships, and policymakers wisely devise methods and strategies to ameliorate the public health risks posed by these polluting substances.
Although pollution control might be the most obvious and important intersection between environmental policy and public health, legal and policy decisions regarding the management …
Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy And Polyamorous Existence, Elizabeth F. Emens
Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy And Polyamorous Existence, Elizabeth F. Emens
Faculty Scholarship
Right now, marriage and monogamy feature prominently on the public stage. Efforts to lift prohibitions on same-sex marriage in this country and abroad have inspired people on all sides of the political spectrum to speak about the virtues of monogamy's core institution and to express views on who should be included within it. The focus of this article is different. Like an "unmannerly wedding guest," this article invites the reader to pause amidst the whirlwind of marriage talk and to think critically about monogamy and its alternatives.
Mome In Hindsight, Ronald J. Gilson, Reinier Kraakman
Mome In Hindsight, Ronald J. Gilson, Reinier Kraakman
Faculty Scholarship
Two decades ago, the Virginia Law Review published our article “The Mechanisms of Market Efficiency” (MOME), in which we tried to discern the institutional underpinnings of financial market efficiency. We concluded that the level of market efficiency with respect to a particular fact depends on which of several market mechanisms — universally informed trading, professionally informed trading, derivatively informed trading, and uninformed trading (each of which we explain below) — operates to reflect that fact in market price. Which mechanism is operative, in turn, depends on how widely the fact is distributed among traders, which, I turn, depends on the …
The Abcs Of Global Governance Of Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Arbitrage, Bioethics And Cloning, George J. Annas
The Abcs Of Global Governance Of Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Arbitrage, Bioethics And Cloning, George J. Annas
Faculty Scholarship
Symposium: Stem Cell Research and Human Cloning: Where Do We Draw the Line: Symposium Transactions
Thank you for that introduction, which reminds me that I used to do regulatory work for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, primarily as a member of the Board of Registration in Medicine, and we had real regulations, real law, that could be enforced. What I am going to talk about today is not "fake law," but a kind of law that is often seen as more like ethics-international law. There is really no such thing as global bioethics governance, but I would like to think that …
Extremely Preterm Birth And Parental Authority To Refuse Treatment: The Case Of Sidney Miller, George J. Annas
Extremely Preterm Birth And Parental Authority To Refuse Treatment: The Case Of Sidney Miller, George J. Annas
Faculty Scholarship
Disputes between physicians and patients over medical care have tended toward resolution in both the courts and ethics committees, with each of these bodies ultimately deciding that the informed, competent patient must be the final decision maker. Parents, too, have the authority to make medical decisions for their children, but these decisions can be challenged if physicians do not believe they are medically reasonable. One bioethical issue, however, is as intractable today as it was 30 years ago, when it began to be publicly discussed: the extent of parental authority to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment for an extremely premature infant. …
Speech And Strife, Robert L. Tsai
Speech And Strife, Robert L. Tsai
Faculty Scholarship
The essay strives for a better understanding of the myths, symbols, categories of power, and images deployed by the Supreme Court to signal how we ought to think about its authority. Taking examples from free speech jurisprudence, the essay proceeds in three steps. First, I argue that the First Amendment constitutes a deep source of cultural authority for the Court. As a result, linguistic and doctrinal innovation in the free speech area have been at least as bold and imaginative as that in areas like the Commerce Clause. Second, in turning to cognitive theory, I distinguish between formal legal argumentation …
Render Copyright Unto Caesar: On Taking Incentives Seriously, Wendy J. Gordon
Render Copyright Unto Caesar: On Taking Incentives Seriously, Wendy J. Gordon
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay suggests we bifurcate our thinking. Conventional copyright rules by money, so let it rule the money-bound. Let a different set of rules evolve for more complex uses, particularly when the users have a personal relationship with the utilized text. Much recent scholarship contains dramatic suggestions to secure a freedom to be creative, rewrite, and be imaginative. My work has long sought to defend such freedoms, but I believe we understand imagination and its conditions too little to employ it as a starting point. I suggest instead that we acquire a better conceptual map of the generative process and …
Collective Guilt And Collective Punishment, George P. Fletcher
Collective Guilt And Collective Punishment, George P. Fletcher
Faculty Scholarship
Attitudes toward collective guilt in the Middle East require us to take a closer look at guilt in the Bible. It turns out the text of Genesis is conflicted. Some passages support a theory of guilt linked with the inevitability of cleansing and punishment; other passages appear to treat guilt as a psychological state that might be cured by a confession of sins. The tension is important today in trying to understand whether the collective guilt of nations should also entail collective punishment.
The Aretaic Turn In Constitutional Theory, Lawrence B. Solum
The Aretaic Turn In Constitutional Theory, Lawrence B. Solum
Faculty Scholarship
The author argues that the aretaic turn in constitutional theory is an institutional approach to theories of constitutional interpretation ought to be supplemented by explicit focus on the virtues and vices of constitutional adjudicators. Part I, The Most Dysfunctional Branch, advances the speculative hypothesis that politicization of the judiciary has led the political branches to exclude consideration of virtue from the nomination and confirmation of Supreme Court Justices and to select Justices on the basis of the strength of their commitment to particular positions on particular issues and the fervor of their ideological passions.
Part II, Institutionalism and Constitutional …
Regulating Teenage Abortion In The United States: Politics And Policy, Carol Sanger
Regulating Teenage Abortion In The United States: Politics And Policy, Carol Sanger
Faculty Scholarship
Thirty-four US states currently require pregnant minors either to notify their parents or get their consent before having a legal abortion. The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of theses statutes provided that minors are also given an alternative mechanism for abortion approval that does not involve parents. The mechanism used is the 'judicial bypass hearing' at which minors persuade judges that they are mature and informed enough to make the abortion decision themselves. While most minors receive judicial approval, the hearings intrude into the most personal aspects of a young woman's life. The hearings, while formally civil in nature, …
[N]Ot A Story To Pass On: Constructing Mothers Who Kill, Susan Ayres
[N]Ot A Story To Pass On: Constructing Mothers Who Kill, Susan Ayres
Faculty Scholarship
Toni Morrison has said in her Nobel acceptance speech, “We die. That may be the meaning of life. But we do language. That may be the measure of our lives.” How we “do language” in judicial decisions about infanticide can perhaps be compared to and informed by fiction such as Toni Morrison’s Beloved.
Beloved provides a fictional account of the life of a historical woman, a slave who escaped to freedom and then attempted to kill all four of her children, successfully killing one when her master came to claim her under the Fugitive Slave Act. In addition to …
Settlement Advocacy, Kay Elkins-Elliott, Frank W. Elliott
Settlement Advocacy, Kay Elkins-Elliott, Frank W. Elliott
Faculty Scholarship
For many years, law schools have based most of their "practical" instruction on the adversary system's last choice: trials and appeals. First year students are taught how to write an appellate brief and how to make an appellant argument. Maybe this is good, since the odds are that any given student will never again write a brief or make such an argument. After the first year of law school, students are swept into trial advocacy courses, mock trial competitions, and appellate advocacy competitions: learning how to influence the minds of jurors and appellate judges. We all know that these activities …
On Gun Registration, The Nra, Adolf Hitler, And Nazi Gun Laws: Exploding The Gun Culture Wars (A Call To Historians), Bernard Harcourt
On Gun Registration, The Nra, Adolf Hitler, And Nazi Gun Laws: Exploding The Gun Culture Wars (A Call To Historians), Bernard Harcourt
Faculty Scholarship
Say the words "gun registration" to many Americans – especially pro-gun Americans, including the 3.5 million-plus members of the National Rifle Association ("NRA") – and you are likely to hear about Adolf Hitler, Nazi gun laws, gun confiscation, and the Holocaust. More specifically, you are likely to hear that one of the first things that Hitler did when he seized power was to impose strict gun registration requirements that enabled him to identify gun owners and then to confiscate all guns, effectively disarming his opponents and paving the way for the genocide of the Jewish population. "German firearm laws and …
"You Are Entering A Gay And Lesbian Free Zone": On The Radical Dissents Of Justice Scalia And Other (Post-) Queers – [Raising Questions About Lawrence, Sex Wars, And The Criminal Law], Bernard Harcourt
Faculty Scholarship
The most renowned substantive criminal law decision of the October 2002 Term, Lawrence v. Texas, will go down in history as a critical turning point in criminal law debates over the proper scope of the penal sanction. For the first time in the history of American criminal law, the United States Supreme Court has declared that a supermajoritarian moral belief does not necessarily provide a rational basis for criminalizing conventionally deviant conduct. The Court's ruling is the coup de grâce to legal moralism administered after a prolonged, brutish, tedious, and debilitating struggle against liberal legalism in its various criminal …
Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds, Charles F. Sabel, William H. Simon
Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds, Charles F. Sabel, William H. Simon
Faculty Scholarship
"Public law litigation" – civil rights advocacy seeking to restructure public agencies - has changed course over the last three decades. It has moved away from remedial intervention modeled on command-and-control bureaucracy toward a kind of intervention that can be called "experimentalist." Instead of top-down, fixed-rule regimes, the experimentalist approach emphasizes ongoing stakeholder negotiation, continuously revised performance measures, and transparency. Experimentalism is evident in all the principal areas of public law intervention – schools, mental health institutions, prisons, police, and public housing. This development has been substantially unanticipated and unnoticed by both advocates and critics of public law litigation. In …
The Role Of Well-Being, Joseph Raz
The Role Of Well-Being, Joseph Raz
Faculty Scholarship
"Well-being" signifies the good life, the life which is good for the person whose life it is. I have argued that well-being consists in a wholehearted and successful pursuit of valuable relationships and goals. This view, a little modified, is defended , but the main aim of the article is to consider the role of well-being in practical thought. In particular I will examine a suggestion which says that when we care about people, and when we ought to care about people, what we do, or ought to, care about is their well-being. The suggestion is indifferent to who cares …
Enron.Org: Why Sarbanes-Oxley Will Not Ensure Comprehensive Nonprofit Accountability, Dana Brakman Reiser
Enron.Org: Why Sarbanes-Oxley Will Not Ensure Comprehensive Nonprofit Accountability, Dana Brakman Reiser
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Subtle Hazards Revisited: The Corruption Of A Financial Holding Company By A Corporate Client's Inner Circle, James A. Fanto
Subtle Hazards Revisited: The Corruption Of A Financial Holding Company By A Corporate Client's Inner Circle, James A. Fanto
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Whistleblowing And The Public Director: Countering Corporate Inner Circles, James A. Fanto
Whistleblowing And The Public Director: Countering Corporate Inner Circles, James A. Fanto
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Pernicious Ambiguity In Contracts And Statutes, Lawrence Solan
Pernicious Ambiguity In Contracts And Statutes, Lawrence Solan
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Understanding Conflict In A Postmodern World, Scott H. Hughes
Understanding Conflict In A Postmodern World, Scott H. Hughes
Faculty Scholarship
This article looks at new theories about the nature and dynamics of human systems in conflict.