Digital Commons Network^™

Standing Up For Flast: Taxpayer And Citizen Standing To Raise Constitutional Issues, David S. Bogen

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Limited Publication In The Fourth And Sixth Circuits, William L. Reynolds, William M. Richman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Discrimination As A Field Of Law, Arthur Larson

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Women In Law School Teaching: Problems And Progress, D. Kelly Weisberg

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Zoning For The Mentally Ill: A Legislative Mandate, Deborah A. Schmedemann

Faculty Scholarship

Under the aegis of President John Kennedy, Congress first began to concern itself with the needs of the mentally ill over two decades ago. Bills providing for community mental health centers and congregate housing have appeared subsequently to attempt to expedite integration of the mentally ill into community life. These congressional mandates, however, have met with reluctance-if not hostility. While federal law makers have been the champion of deinstitutionalization, they have placed responsibility for implementation of their programs on the state and local levels. There, local governmental authorities have reacted defensively to exclude the mentally ill from their neighborhoods, primarily …

Families With Service Needs: The Newest Euphemism, Stanley Z. Fisher

Faculty Scholarship

Juvenile court jurisdiction over "status offenders" - juveniles engaging in noncriminal misconduct such as truancy, running away, and "incorrigibility" - has become the subject of national debate. Most participants in the many-sided discussion agree that the system needs reform. The major disagreement, however, is between those who wish merely to reform the court's jurisdiction over this conduct, and those who would substantially eliminate it. This article concerns the newest reform proposal: to revise status offense jurisdiction under a new category entitled "Families With Service Needs" (FWSN). Proposed in 1977 by a federally funded task force, 5 the FWSN concept has …

The Denial Of Eleventh Amendment Immunity To Political Subdivisions Of The States: An Unjustified Strain On Federalism, Margreth Barrett

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Law Books And Legal Publishing In America, 1760-1840, Jenni Parrish

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Letter To Hon. John H. Shenefield, William W. Schwarzer

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Adjudication As A Private Good: A Comment, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Introduction To Cleary's Presuming And Pleading: An Essay On Juristic Immaturity, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Workers' Compensation Insurance Carrier As Third Party Tortfeasor, Barbara P. Blumenfeld

Faculty Scholarship

At the time workers' compensation was conceived, the theory of liability without fault was a new concept. The original acts were, therefore, drafted cautiously. The statutes had either a limited application or were noncompulsory in nature.20 Although a common law action against an employer was eliminated, the statutes generally preserved some form of action against a third party tortfeasor under the common law.

This case note asks the legislature to revise the Michigan Workers' Compensation Act so to explicitly define the insurer's relationship to the employer insofar as immunity is concerned.

Disqualification Of An Attorney Representing Multiple Witnesses Before A Grand Jury: Legal Ethics And The Stonewall Defense, Nancy J. Moore

Faculty Scholarship

Prompted by the increasing recognition that certain economic and political conduct (such as consumer fraud, environmental pollution, and questionable campaign financing practices) has a profound effect on society, lawmakers have recently labelled as criminal "a whole range of political and business activities which, until recently, had been a more or less accepted part of American life."I Armed with both new statutes and a new aggressiveness in the enforcement of pre-existing statutes, 2 federal and state prosecutors have during the past ten years compiled an impressive record in the investigation and prosecution of white collar crime, organized crime and official corruption.3 …

An Assessment Of The Use Of Cost-Benefit Analysis In Regulatory Agency Decision Making, Michael S. Baram

Faculty Scholarship

CONSIDERABLE dissatisfaction has been expressed with the process and results of regulatory agency decision making. Recommendations have been made that the Federal agencies employ rational, "balancing" approaches such as cost-benefit analysis in conducting their standard setting and adjudicatory functions.

This paper examines some current uses of cost-benefit analysis by several agencies in their decision-making processes, and identifies and discusses apparent limitations.

Reconciling Quinlan And Saikewicz: Decision Making For The Terminally Ill Incompetent, George J. Annas

Faculty Scholarship

One of the most perplexing problems in the medicolegal field concerns the criteria on which decisions not to treat terminally ill incompetent patients should be made. These decisions traditionally have been made by physicians in hospitals-sometimes with the assistance of the patient's family-on the basis of their perceptions of the patient's "best interests." Recently, two state supreme courts have ruled on this question. The New Jersey Supreme Court, in the Quinlan case, developed a medical prognosis criterion, and permitted the patient's guardian, family, and physicians to apply it with the concurrence of a hospital "ethics committee." The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial …

Enforcing Promises: An Examination Of The Basis Of Contract, Charles J. Goetz, Robert E. Scott

Faculty Scholarship

The obligation to keep promises is a commonly acknowledged moral duty. Yet not all promises – however solemnly vowed – are enforceable at law. Why are some promises legally binding and others not? Orthodox doctrinal categories provide only modest assistance in answering this persistent question. Conventional analysis, for example, has distinguished promises made in exchange for a return promise or performance from nonreciprocal promises. Indeed, common law "bargain theory" is classically simple: bargained-for promises are presumptively enforceable; nonreciprocal promises are presumptively unenforceable. But this disarmingly simple theory has never mirrored reality. Contract law has ventured far beyond such narrow limitations, …

Taking Supreme Court Opinions Seriously, Henry Paul Monaghan

Faculty Scholarship

Taking Supreme Court opinions seriously emerged as a topic of discussion at a lunch I attended last year with several Supreme Court law clerks. Somehow we came round to a particular three-judge district court case which I confidently opined was "certain" to be reversed on the basis of principles announced in prior opinions. The clerks were models of politeness and circumspection; never once did they even intimate that the judgment would (by divided vote) be affirmed. But shortly after I had announced my views of that case, one of the clerks began to prod me, asking whether I simply took …

The Recurring Question Of The “Limited” Constitutional Convention, Walter E. Dellinger Iii

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Adjudication As A Private Good: A Comment, Paul D. Carrington

Faculty Scholarship

Comment on William M. Landes & Richard A. Posner, Adjudication as a Private Good, 8 J. Legal Stud. 235 (1979).

Should Federal Appellate Judges Help Select Their Colleagues?, Peter G. Fish

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Fairness And Natural Justice In English And South African Law, Lawrence G. Baxter

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Civil Litigation And Jura Novit Curia, Lawrence G. Baxter

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Passage Through International Straits: A Right Preserved In The Third United Nations Conference On The Law Of The Sea, Horace B. Robertson

Faculty Scholarship

In 1971, when the negotiations leading to the development of a new treaty on the law of the sea were in their earliest stages, the head of the U.S. delegation, John R. Stevenson, declared that freedom of passage through international straits was an essential element of any agreement that would be acceptable to the United States.

Compromise Provisions Regarding In Rem Procedures, Joseph Sweeney

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

‘Oath-Functions’ And The ‘Oath Process’ In The Civil And Criminal Law Of The Ancient Near East, Donald Magnetti

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Laetrile: The Battle Moves Into The Courtroom, Robert L. Schwartz

Faculty Scholarship

Controversy over the supposed cancer-curing drug laetrile continues to rage. Now it's up to the courts. substance that was used by ancient Greek physicians, has been available in the United States, legally or illegally, for a quarter of a century. The government's increased efforts to eliminate laetrile "pushing" by what are seen to be profiteering physicians has created a strengthened laetrile lobby that has successfully fought the medical establishment and succeeded in making the drug legal in more than a dozen states. The pro-laetrile lobby an assortment of cancer patients and their families, medical professionals, and conservative politicians -threatens to …

Governmental Regulation Of The Press: A Study Of Israel's Press Ordinance - Part Ii, Pnina Lahav

Faculty Scholarship

In the beginning, use of the Press Ordinance (hereafter Pr. Ord.) was limited, but as British political control deteriorated it became more extensive and even ruthless. In 1937, the Peel Report complained that the Pr. Ord. was not tough enough and recommended stricter measures.³ At about the same time, the Mandatory Government itself reached the conclusion that the Pr. Ord. was insufficient and issued a series of Defence (Emergency) Regulations which suspended the entire range of civil liberties-including freedom of expression. These Defence (Emergency) Regulations which related to the press replaced in part and fortified in part the Pr. …

Special Report On Endangered Species And New Life Forms: Conversation With A Cockroach, George J. Annas

Faculty Scholarship

On June 15, 1978, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Endangered Species Act of 1973 required the enjoining of the operation of a virtually completed dam, the Tellico Dam in Tennessee, because of a determination by the Secretary of the Interior that its operation would eradicate the snail darter, an endangered species.

Where Are The Health Lawyers When We Need Them, George J. Annas

Faculty Scholarship

A momentous event in the field of health law occurred in April of 1978: the first national meeting of teachers of health law was held at Boston University. Of sixty individuals invited, almost all of whom teach health law as a full-time profession in various graduate schools, forty-five participated in the two-day workshop. While that response alone may have revealed the answer, the first topic on the agenda was: "Is health law a discipline?"

Governmental Regulation Of The Press: A Study Of Israel's Press Ordinance - Part I, Pnina Lahav

Faculty Scholarship

This article is part of a broader effort to analyse the relationship between the press and the legal system in Israel. Being only a segment of a larger project, it is devoted in its entirely to one component of Israel's press law: the Press Ordinance of 1933 (hereafter Pr. Ord.). Although antiquated and considered by certain circles as merely a "dead letter", the Pr. Ord. still forms the backbone of Israel's press law, since it regulates so many aspects of the press. Beyond its relevance as positive law, the Pr. Ord. is of interest for a number of reasons. Having …