Digital Commons Network^™

The Use And Abuse Of Warnings In Products Liability -- Design Defect Litigation Comes Of Age, Aaron Twerski, A. S. Weinstein, W. A. Donaher, H. R. Piehler

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Senegal Valley Authority: A Unique Experiment In International River Basin Planning, Theodore Parnall, Albert E. Utton

Faculty Scholarship

The OMVS (l'Organisation Pour la Mise en Valeur du Fleuve Senegal) is a unique exception to this assessment. The three West African governments of Mali, Mauretania, and Senegal (the "Member States") are engaged in an experiment in international organization that is not only following the most advanced concepts of integrated river basin development,, but which may also afford a lesson in cooperation on a broad scale. This article is intended as a description of the organizational history and structure of the OMVS and a comparison with those of other international river commissions with similar goals.

Uniformity In State Inheritance Laws: How Upc Article Ii Has Fared In Nine Enactments, Richard V. Wellman, James W. Gordon

Faculty Scholarship

The Uniform Probate Code was drafted to facilitate modernization, simplification, and uniformity of state inheritance laws. Since its approval by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and by the American Bar Association in August 1969, the Code has been enacted in various forms by 11 states. In this Article, the Authors analyze significant deviations from the recommended version of article II in the first nine enactments of the UPC. The Authors argue that all but exceptionally meritorious changes in enacted versions of the UPC should give way to the goal of state uniformity in inheritance laws, and …

First Amendment Protection For Commercial Advertising: The New Constitutional Doctrine, Thomas W. Merrill

Faculty Scholarship

Governmental regulation of commercial advertising has become a major focus of challenges to established first amendment doctrine. An increasing number of suits have raised constitutional objections to regulations of false or deceptive advertising, regulations of offensive advertising, prohibitions of commercial advertising in certain forums, prohibitions of price advertising for particular products or services, and prohibitions of all advertising for particular products or services.' Until recently, the majority of courts upheld such regulations under the Supreme Court's ruling in Valentine v. Chrestensen that "purely commercial advertising" is unprotected by the first amendment.

In the last two years the Court has subjected …

Search And Seizure Of The Media: A Statutory, Fourth Amendment And First Amendment Analysis, James S. Liebman

Faculty Scholarship

On the evening of October 10, 1974, police appeared at radio station KPFK-FM in Los Angeles with a warrant authorizing them to search the premises for a New World Liberation Front (NWLF) "communique" that took credit for a recent bombing. The officers conducted an intensive 8-hour search-combing files, listening to tapes, and looking through reporters' notes – finally concluding that the NWLF letter was not at the station. The KPFK search warrant was one of six that California law enforcement officials have executed at press offices since 1972. The circumstances surrounding the incident illustrate the rationale behind the recent development …

On Reading Cramton, Currie & Kay -- Reflections And Prophecies For The Age Of Interest Analysis, Aaron Twerski

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Tax Policy Implications Of Contributions Of Appreciated And Depreciated Property To Partnerships, Subchapter C Corporations And Subchapter S Corporations In Exchange For Ownership Interests, Samuel C. Thompson Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Standards Of Judicial Administration: Appellate Courts, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Congressional Papers And Judicial Subpoenas And The Constitution, David H. Kaye

Faculty Scholarship

Some contemporary Congresses have lost sight of the original scope of their predecessors' assertions of privilege and now claim an absolute privilege to withhold both the originals and copies of subpoenaed papers. A few judicial opinions suggest as much or more. It is possible that even cursorily documented, ill-considered dicta can take root and flourish, and to prevent that, this article This article charts the constitutional boundaries of Congress' privilege to withhold its internal papers from judicial subpoena. It surveys the privileges expressly given Congress in the text of the Constitution as well as the privileges that might be implied …

Freedom Of The Press And Public Access: Toward A Theory Of Partial Regulation Of The Mass Media, Lee C. Bollinger

Faculty Scholarship

During the past half century there have existed in this country two opposing constitutional traditions regarding the press. On the one hand, the Supreme Court has accorded the print media virtually complete constitutional protection from attempts by government to impose affirmative controls such as access regulation. On the other hand, the Court has held affirmative regulation of the broadcast media to be constitutionally permissible, and has even suggested that it may be constitutionally compelled. In interpreting the first amendment, the Court in one context has insisted on the historical right of the editor to be free from government scrutiny, but …

The Definition Of Disability In Social Security And Supplemental Security Income: Drawing The Bounds Of Social Welfare Estates, Lance Liebman

Faculty Scholarship

Federal aid to the disabled is a vast enterprise; over nine billion dollars are annually paid to five million beneficiaries. In this Article, Professor Liebman points out how the ad hoc nature of social welfare legislation and programming has resulted in a system that produces inconsistent and sometimes inequitable determinations of disability. The present system, he argues, draws significant economic and social distinctions among the disabled, as well as distinctions between the disabled and the unemployed, that have been inadequately explained and justified. By focusing on worker expectations generated by the administration of our disability programs, and on the structural …

Regulation Of Electroconvulsive Therapy, Carol Sanger

Faculty Scholarship

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a psychiatric procedure that induces a convulsive seizure in the patient in order to treat severe depression. Recently, courts, legislatures, and the medical profession have paid increasing attention to the regulation of ECT. Their interest has been stimulated by the growing recognition of the rights of mental patients, the developing role of consent in medical transactions, and the results of recent scientific research on the efficacy and consequences of ECT.

Regulation of ECT has generally focused on whether the patient or his representative effectively consented to the treatment. The highly intrusive nature of ECT and the …

Class Actions, Richard Briffault

Faculty Scholarship

In 1966, the Supreme Court promulgated an amended rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, replacing a rule that had remained unchanged since 1938. The 1938 rule, which was understood to reflect Professor Moore's famous distinctions among "true," "hybrid," and "spurious" class suits, proved to be a source of confusion almost from its date of promulgation, and by i966 courts were having great difficulty applying the concepts of joint and several rights the rule relied upon to define cases appropriate for class treatment. Commentators ignored the terms of the rule and sought justification for conclusive adjudication of absentee …

Injury To Reputation And The Constitution: Confusion Amid Conflicting Approaches, George C. Christie

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Consent And The Roots Of Judicial Authority: The Constitutional Writings Of Archibald Cox (Book Review), Thomas D. Rowe Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

Reviewing A. Cox, The Role of the Supreme Court in American Government

Criminal Law And Procedure, David Rossman

Faculty Scholarship

The Constitutionality of the Trial de Novo System. The legal challenge to the constitutionality of the Massachusetts trial de novo system was settled by the Supreme Court of the United States during the Survey year in Ludwig v. Massachusetts. The Court upheld the Commonwealth's practice of trial de novo finding that the system does not constitute an impermissible burden upon a defendant's right to a trial by jury and that the requirement that a defendant undergo two trials in order to obtain a jury trial is not a violation of the right against double jeopardy.

Disposing Of A Pre-Existing H.R. 10 Plan In Connection With A Post-Erisa Business Incorporation, J. Clifton Fleming Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Multiemployer Concept In The Public Sector, Louis B. Kimmelman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Attorney's Responsibilities: Adversaries At The Bar Of The Sec, Roberta S. Karmel, Joseph C. Daley

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Extraterritorial Application Of The Federal Securities Code, Roberta S. Karmel

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments In The Law Of Equal Educational Opportunity, Betsy Levin

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Perspectives On Sex Discrimination In Jury Selection, Elizabeth M. Schneider, Rhonda Copelon, Nancy Stearns

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

When You Enter The Hospital Check Your Rights At The Door, George J. Annas

Faculty Scholarship

Civil libertarians have little difficulty appreciating the plight of prisoners or mental patients. But tell the average civil libertarian that there are significant and unnecessary restrictions on the individual rights and liberties of patients in general hospitals, and you are likely to encounter a blank stare. There are a number of reasons for this lack of attention to hospitals. One is the general misconception that the problems are minor, or that certain temporary restrictions on individuals are essential if hospitals are to treat sick people properly. An unconscious desire not to perceive ourselves as being at risk may be another …

The Taney Period, 1836-64, David S. Bogen

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Coupling, Parenting And The Presence Of Others Intimate Relationships In Communal Households, D. Kelly Weisberg, Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Dennis Jaffe

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Unbundling Of Higher Education, William K.S. Wang

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Pardoning Power Of Article Ii Of The Constitution, The , John D. Feerick

Faculty Scholarship

Following President Gerald Ford's unconditional pardon of former President Richard Nixon on September 8, 1974, claims were made that the pardon was invalid because it came before indictment and conviction. Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski was urged to test its validity in court. Indeed, one federal judge expressed in open court the view that the public interest required the pardon's validity to be tested. The Special Prosecutor's decision not to proceed appears well founded when a review is made of the history of the President's pardoning power.

Uncitral Draft Convention On Carriage Of Goods By Sea, Part 3, Joseph Sweeney

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Pardoning Power Of Article Ii Of The Constitution (Continued), The , John D. Feerick

Faculty Scholarship

Following President Gerald Ford's unconditional pardon of former President Richard Nixon on September 8, 1974, claims were made that the pardon was invalid because it came before indictment and conviction. Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski was urged to test its validity in court. Indeed, one federal judge expressed in open court the view that the public interest required the pardon's validity to be tested. The Special Prosecutor's decision not to proceed appears well founded when a review is made of the history of the President's pardoning power.

The Future Of Sentencing Reform: Emerging Legal Issues In The Individualization Of Justice, John C. Coffee Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

The dilemma of the American sentencing judge is qualitatively unique. Because our system of criminal justice has embraced to a degree unequaled elsewhere the rehabilitative ideal that punishment should fit not the crime, but the particular criminal, the sentencing judge must labor to fulfill the dual and sometimes conflicting roles of judge and clinician. Entrusted with enormous discretion, he is expected to "individualize" the sentence he imposes to suit the character, social history, and potential for recidivism of the offender before him. Yet, because of the general absence in our Sentencing Reform system of meaningful procedures for the appellate review …